Latest
Latest News
Chronicle
ONDCP: Nombran al jefe Gil Kerlikowske de la PolicÃa de Seattle nuevo fiscal de la droga
Los reformadores de las polÃticas de drogas esperaban que una persona de la salud pública â no un policÃa ni un soldado â fuera nombrada fiscal de la droga. Un policÃa nos han dado, pero un policÃa de una ciudad liberal. ¿Será un jefe de policÃa (posiblemente) progresista igualmente bueno como fiscal de la droga?
Event
Free Screening of "Waiting to Inhale: Marijuana, Medicine, and the Law"
*FREE REFRESHMENTS*
Event
Support Safe Access for the Seriously Ill - Benefit Concert
A Benefit for Berkeley Patients Group's James R. Russell Memorial Hospice Program. A Program that brings free medicine to those who need it most.
Chronicle
Policial: Las historias de policÃas corruptos de esta semana
Puede que algo huela a podrido en la brigada antidroga de Filadelfia, seguro que algo huele a podrido en Boston y, sÃ, cae otro agente penitenciario.
Event
Rally, Concert and Lobby Day to End Cannabis Prohibition
Rally, Concert and Lobby Day to demand an End To The Prohibition of Marijuana!
Lobby Noon - 2 p.m.*, Rally & Concert 2 p.m. - 6 p.m., Dead show doors 6 p.m.
Event
Benefit for MassCann and NORML
Event: 4/20 Preparty at Harperâs Ferry with Graveyard BBQ, Prospect Hill and more!
Event
Peaceful Protest for Charles C. Lynch and Medical Marijuana
PLEASE JOIN US! Show your support for Charles C. Lynch, his family & the hundreds of others facing Federal prosecution.
Event
Meetup to Free Ryan Frederick!
Don Tabor, on behalf of the Tidewater Libertarian Party, will address the city council to request a citizen review of police procedures used in the investigation and the raid on Ryan's home. Dr.
In The Trenches
Action Alert: Protest Rule Changes for Medical Cannabis Caregivers
Action Alert: Protest Board of Health Proposed Rules Changes for Medicinal Cannabis Caregivers
Compiled by: Colorado Citizens for Compassionate Cannabis
March 2: Written Comments Deadline
Feb 20: Pre-Public Hearing "Conference" and Silent Protest
March 18: Public Hearing
The Colorado Board of Health is proposing sweeping new rules to regulate medical cannabis that contradict the intent of Article 18, Section 14 of the Colorado Constitution, Colorado's medical cannabis law that was approved by voters in 2000. These proposed rules only serve to make it more difficult for patients to get their medicine by forcing them back into the black market. The Board of Health should be compassionate and helpful towards these sick and dying people and not put more obstacles in their way.
Currently, patients with a debilitating medical condition and approval of their physician may legally possess up to two ounces of cannabis and grow up to six plants. If they are unable to grow the medicine themselves, the Constitution allows them to appoint a primary caregiver to provide the medicine for them. The Constitution does not set limits on how many patients for whom a person can be the caregiver, nor does it set limits on the type of person that can be considered the patient's caregiver.
The Board of Health's proposed new rules set limits on caregivers that are clearly unconstitutional.
1) The Board of Health wants to require caregivers to provide other services to the patient besides cannabis-related ones. The other services required would amount to those of a full-time nursing assistant and would have to include transportation, housekeeping, meal preparation, shopping and making medical care arrangements for the patient.
Currently, a person can be a medicinal cannabis caregiver without providing other services. The Constitution only states that the caregiver must have "significant responsibility for managing the well-being of a patient", which would include providing them with medicine. It does not impose any other requirements on caregivers
2) The Health Department is proposing a 5-patient-per-caregiver limit on the number of patients for whom a caregiver could provide.
Currently, a caregiver can provide for many patients. Most patients do not have the knowledge or are too sick to grow their own cannabis. It takes years of practice to learn how to grow an adequate supply of cannabis for one patient with only the 6 plants allowed by the Constitution. Cannabis cultivation experts have been enlisted to serve as caregivers and have not been limited on how many patients they are able to serve. As reported in Westword, therapeutic cannabis dispensaries have formed all over Colorado to provide for multiple patients. The dispensaries are able to produce medicines in quantities large enough to keep the cost to the patient at a minimum and to create edible forms of cannabis, such as cookies, brownies and other foods. Cooking with cannabis requires a much larger amount of the raw substance than smoking cannabis does. However, eating medicinal cannabis food is a far healthier way to ingest the medicine than inhaling its smoke is, especially for those with chronic conditions.
In fact, having caregivers provide for multiple patients has been the only way that poorly-written Article 18, Section 14 of the Colorado Constitution has worked at all. At the time, the out-of-state authors of Colorado's Medicinal Cannabis Law were widely criticized for not addressing the issue of cannabis dispensaries clearly enough and for not providing any legal way for patients to obtain medicinal cannabis outside of the black market. This left a gray area in the law that the Health Department has since tried to exploit in order to deny patients their Consitutionally-protected medicine. In the nine years since the law was approved by voters, the state of Colorado has been more concerned with putting roadblocks in the way of patients instead of trying to help implement the law.
The possible upcoming change in federal policy concerning medicinal cannabis makes it the perfect time for Colorado to develop a plan to provide safe access to cannabis for patients. President Obama has made repeated campaign promises that he would stop the federal prosecution of cannabis patients and create a "green economy." . Recently, the White House reiterated their intention to change federal policy to allow states to regulate cannabis without federal intervention.
In light of this new federal policy, it is time for Colorado to regulate medicinal cannabis statewide in a way that provides safe and inexpensive access to cannabis. The Colorado Board of Health should be issuing rules that encourage and regulate cannabis dispensaries, just like any other pharmaceutical manufacturer. Or alternatively, they could enlist the aid of the Colorado Department of Agriculture and the Ag School at CSU to create a regulated state-run cannabis dispensary program.
We are urging Colorado Governor Bill Ritter to form the Colorado Therapeutic Cannabis Commission, as described in the Compassionate Therapeutic Cannabis Act, an initiatve that was proposed as an alternative to the flawed Article 18, Section 14 of the Colorado Constitution. The Colorado Therapeutic Cannabis Commission would be a statewide panel of experts charged with the duty of ensuring patients can obtain an affordable and adequate supply of therapeutic cannabis.
The key to successful implementation of Article 18, Section 14 of the Colorado Constitution is to put the patient first and find a way to provide them with medicine in a safe and cost-effective manner without endangering them by forcing them to deal with the black market.
Event
12 Day Ayahuasca Healing Workshop
The Temple of the Way of Light is a shamanic healing centre offering intensive Ayahuasca retreats with female shamans (curanderas).
Latest News
Latest News
Blog
Drug War Protestors Block Traffic Along Mexican Border
Sandwiched between violent cartels and a brutal military occupation force, the Mexican people are understandably running out of patience:
As one might expect, the Mexican government has been quick to dismiss the protestors, even going so far as to accuse them of collaborating with the drug traffickers:
Unbelievable. I guess the idea that the citizens of Mexico would complain about human rights violations by their own military is so inconceivable that it simply must be the drug lords who made them do it.
Ultimately, it should prove difficult for the government to continue portraying public opposition as a PR experiment sponsored the traffickers. Trivializing public sentiment is a losing proposition in the long term, especially when youâre thoroughly unprepared to address the conditions that are pissing everyone off.
If anyone is serving the political and financial interests of the drug traffickers it is the U.S. and Mexican government officials who continue to champion the failed drug strategy that is ripping Mexico apart before our eyes.
We tend to view the U.S. and Mexican governments as well as the cartels as the primary actors in shaping the discussion of the nationâs drug war, but the Mexican people themselves will likely begin to play a more visible role as the situation further deteriorates. Rampant civil rights abuses by the Mexican military are quickly becoming regarded as a cure worse than the disease and it may only be a matter of time before public sentiments tip in favor of a dramatic change of course.
Hundreds of people in Mexico have blocked key crossings into the US in protests against the deployment of the army fighting drug traffickers.
Traffic was brought to a halt on a number of bridges in several border towns in northern Mexico.
The protesters accused the army of abuse against civilians. [BBC]
As one might expect, the Mexican government has been quick to dismiss the protestors, even going so far as to accuse them of collaborating with the drug traffickers:
â¦the governor of one state - Nuevo Leon - said he believed the Gulf drugs cartel and its armed wing, the Zetas, were behind the border protests.
"There are reasons to believe it has to do with the Gulf cartel and the group known as the Zetas," Governor Natividad Gonzalez said.
Unbelievable. I guess the idea that the citizens of Mexico would complain about human rights violations by their own military is so inconceivable that it simply must be the drug lords who made them do it.
Ultimately, it should prove difficult for the government to continue portraying public opposition as a PR experiment sponsored the traffickers. Trivializing public sentiment is a losing proposition in the long term, especially when youâre thoroughly unprepared to address the conditions that are pissing everyone off.
If anyone is serving the political and financial interests of the drug traffickers it is the U.S. and Mexican government officials who continue to champion the failed drug strategy that is ripping Mexico apart before our eyes.
Blog
Legalizing Marijuana Doesnât Mean We Have to Legalize Horrible Crimes
Calls for legalization in the aftermath of the Michael Phelps media frenzy havenât met with much backlash, probably because the gold-medal winning bong-monger kinda breaks the mold as far as stoner stereotyping goes. So we should be grateful, if anything, for the few anti-drug zealots that are so unhinged, so consumed by reefer madness, that they feel compelled to speak even when doing so serves only to further expose and embarrass their crazy beliefs:
Ok, I donât think you understand. We want to legalize marijuana, but not murder. Does that make sense? Armed robbery, etc. would still be illegal. No one will ever try to legalize violent crime, so shut up and stop worrying about that.
Itâs a shame what marijuana does to some peopleâs brains.
The recent incident involving Michael Phelps getting caught smoking pot has caused the age long debate to rear its head again on whether or not we should legalize or at least decriminalize our drug laws. The idea in attacking the drug laws is that people should be free to make their own decisions. The problem with that line of reasoning is that you would never be able to draw the line on establishing any law. Everything would have to be legal, including armed robbery, murder, assault, etc. In essence, it would be anarchy. [Shreveport Times]
Ok, I donât think you understand. We want to legalize marijuana, but not murder. Does that make sense? Armed robbery, etc. would still be illegal. No one will ever try to legalize violent crime, so shut up and stop worrying about that.
Itâs a shame what marijuana does to some peopleâs brains.
Blog
Ryan Frederick Update
Ryan Frederick "Odds and Ends," via Radley Balko.
Pagination
- First page
- Previous page
- …
- 676
- 677
- 678
- 679
- 680
- …
- Next page
- Last page