Skip to main content

Latest

In The Trenches

4:20 Drug War NEWS Update 03/10/08

[Courtesy of Drug Truth Network] Drug Truth Network Update: 4:20 Drug War NEWS from 90.1 FM in Houston and dozens of radio affiliates in the US and Canada & on the web at www.kpft.org. We provide the "unvarnished truth about the drug war" to scores of broadcast affiliates in the US and Canada. 4:20 Drug War NEWS 03/10/08 to 03/16/08 now online (3:00 ea:) Select online at www.drugtruth.net Mon - "Voice of Colombia" (1/3) with Luz Elena Castro & Alejandro Magyaroff Tue - "Voice of Colombia" (2/3) with Luz Elena Castro & Alejandro Magyaroff Wed - Voice of Colombia" (3/3) with Luz Elena Castro & Alejandro Magyaroff Thu - Drug Truth Network Editorial with Rev. Dean Becker, speaker for Law Enforcement Against Prohibition Fri - Poppygate Report with Glenn Greenway Sat - Drug War Facts with Doug McVay Sun - Phil Smith, writes for Drug War Chronicle Next - Century of Lies on Tues, Cutural Baggage on Wed (Now With Transcripts): - Cultural Baggage 12:30 PM ET, 11:30 AM CT, 10:30 AM MT & 9:30 AM PT: Elizabeth McDavid, Dem Cand for Tx Rep - Century of Lies 12:30 PM ET, 11:30 AM CT, 10:30 AM MT & 9:30 AM PT: John Baeza of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition Hundreds of our programs are available online at www.drugtruth.net, www.audioport.org and at www.radio4all.net. Check out our latest videos via www.youtube.com/fdbecker: Please become part of the solution, visit our website: www.endprohibition.org for links to the best of reform. "Prohibition is evil." - Reverend Dean Becker, Drug Truth Network Producer Dean Becker 713-849-6869 www.drugtruth.net
In The Trenches

Just Say Know Weekly News: 3/8/08

[Courtesy of Just Say Know] Visit Our Web Site: If you’re using internet explorer web browser use this link: http://jsknow.angelfire.com/home If you’re using any other web browser use this link: http://jsknow.angelfire.com/index.html Please pass this message on to ALL your contacts in the USA and ask them to join our mailing list using the form on our website. THANK YOU! We never share email addresses from our mailing list with anyone. Just Say Know works on your behalf toward drug policy reform, preserving and re-instating your legal rights. Drug policy and enforcement tactics are out of control and removing your rights at an alarming rate. Your financial contributions are greatly appreciated. To make a donation reply to this message with “donation” in the subject line and an associate will contact you by return email. Thank you for your consideration. Don’t hesitate to contact us by replying to this message; we appreciate your comments, questions and concerns. Together we will make a difference! The drug war is being used as an excuse to remove your rights, steal your property destroy your ability to earn a living and many other harms to citizens and society. There’s a mountain of evidence supporting the need for policy reform that makes citizens, their family, their livelihood and their property more secure. One very good first step will be taking away the ability of criminals to profit from cannabis. How? Just like it was done with alcohol, remove the prohibition and regulate legal adult use. As soon as alcohol prohibition ended, the crime and violence caused by alcohol prohibition ended. The year alcohol prohibition was repealed violent crime fell by sixty five percent. Tell your friends about the "Enough is Enough" petition to stop the reckless overuse of SWAT tactics and save the lives of civilians and police alike. This petition is sponsored by: StoptheDrugWar.org Click here for details. Feature Story: YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS DENIED BY THE DRUG WAR In the next few weeks we’ll be looking at several Constitutional rights and how the drug war has been used to remove them. This week we look at: FREE SPEECH Freedom of speech is being eroded in the name of the drug war, retaining this right is one of the primary benchmarks that define a free society. When government seeks to infringe on this right it’s a major step toward a tyrannical policy which we must not tolerate. The “bong hits for Jesus” case is a flagrant example of the wrong direction our policy is sometimes taking. In that case a high school student displayed a banner reading “bong hits for Jesus” in an attempt to catch the attention of news cameras. The act was nothing more than a youthful prank intended for no other purpose than to get his banner on the news. Morse v. Frederick, 127 S. Ct. 2618 (2007), was the result. A First Amendment student free speech case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a school principal may, consistent with the First Amendment, restrict student speech at a school event when that speech is “reasonably viewed as promoting illegal drug use”. This banner in no way promoted drug use. A bong is sometimes used for smoking drugs but can also be used for smoking tobacco. The word “hits” is used to refer to taking a puff and also does not necessarily refer exclusively to drug use. Although the action in this case was a prank and obviously had nothing to do with any political issue, the right of students or any citizen to make a statement or express an opinion is necessary to allow for views about existing policy to be considered, discussed and changed when appropriate. Right now in the “land of the free” someone is being charged with a “drug crime” every 17 seconds. Any law that causes the arrest of non-violent otherwise law abiding citizens in such frequency is in dire need of revision. Students are often on the front line of policy change when their government chooses to follow a harmful path. Such was certainly the case with the Vietnam War. Young people had a major influence on ending that war. Restricting the voice of our students about illegal drugs is a direct move toward government oppression and promoting government policy against the will of the people. Since this ruling interprets the use of the words on the banner to promote drug use and particularly cannabis, it raises interesting questions. Cannabis has been proven to be one of the safest drugs and possibly the safest drug known. In all of recorded history there has never been a death attributed to the drugs in cannabis. We permit the use of aspirin, caffeine, alcohol and tobacco which kill thousands of Americans each year, so are we truly in danger because of cannabis which has never killed anyone? In the “bong hits for Jesus” case the “dangers of illegal drug use” was mentioned many times. There simply are no significant dangers from the use of cannabis.
In The Trenches

U.N. Committee Urges U.S. to Reform Disenfranchisement Laws

[Courtesy of The Sentencing Project]

Dear Friends,

The United Nations' Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination today called on the U.S. to automatically restore voting rights to people with felony convictions upon completion of their criminal sentence, and raised concern that such policies have a disparate racial and ethnic impact and may be in violation of international law.

"The Committee remains concerned about the disparate impact that existing felon disenfranchisement laws have on a large number of persons belonging to racial, ethnic and national minorities, in particular African-American persons, who are disproportionately represented at every stage of the criminal justice system," concluded the Committee in their recommendations to the U.S. Government.

The widespread practice of denying voting rights to people with felony convictions in the United States disenfranchises 5.3 million citizens. Eleven states restrict voting by people even after they have completed their sentence, including prison, probation and parole, and many are barred for life. Approximately 1.5 million people are disenfranchised post-sentence. No other democratic nation disenfranchises people for life even after completion of sentence, and many impose no restrictions at all on people with felony convictions.

These recommendations come on the heels of new research conducted by The Sentencing Project that finds 1 in 50 African-American women cannot vote, an increase of nearly 14% since 2000. This rate of disenfranchisement is nearly four times the rate for non-African-American women.Overall, an estimated 792,200 women are ineligible to vote as a result of U.S. felony disenfranchisement laws.

Currently, an estimated 1.4 million African-American men, 13%, are locked out of the ballot box, a rate seven times the national average. Given current rates of incarceration, three in ten of the next generation of black men can expect to be disenfranchised at some point in their lifetime.

To view a copy of the Committee's recommendations, please visit: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cerd/docs/co/CERD-C-USA-CO-6.pdf.

To learn more about U.S. felony disenfranchisement policy and its impact, see these reports by The Sentencing Project: Felony Disenfranchisement Rates for Women and Felony Disenfranchisement Laws in the United States.

In The Trenches

The Sentencing Project - Disenfranchisement: News/Updates 3/7/08

Missisippi: Secretary of State Moves to Disenfranchise More Voters A voter restriction legislation package that has already passed the state Senate and is soon to arrive at the House adds even more prohibitions to the state's felony voting laws, according to the Meridian Star. Secretary of State Delbert Hosemann released a statement boasting that the state isn't the first to debate removing all felons from the voter rolls. He said "of the 50,000 criminals which are incarcerated or fall under the supervision of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, only 12,000 are prohibited from voting." Defending his proposal, he stated: "It is time for the felony voting requirement to be brought into the 21st century." State Sen. Joey Fillingane said banning all citizens with felony offenses "will make the law easier to understand." He added that individuals could regain the right to vote two years after a sentence is served - but there would still be exceptions for certain offenses. "Right now, a lot of people sitting in jail think they have lost the right to vote, but really they haven't," Fillingane was quoted as saying in the Hattiesburg American. "This would make it where everyone would understand. It would be an incentive to finish the sentence, wait for a period of time and get the right to vote back." Kentucky: Governor Removes Some Disenfranchisement Barriers Newly installed Governor Steve Beshear has removed some disenfranchisement barriers, making it somewhat easier for those who have served their sentences to vote, the Kentucky Herald Leader reported. Formerly incarcerated individuals will no longer have to pay a $2 fee, write an essay or get recommendations to regain the right to vote. Citizens, however, still have to get their civil rights restored by the governor. Kentucky and Virginia are the only two states where all formerly incarcerated individuals are banned from voting unless the governor restores their civil rights. A constitutional amendment would be needed to change that. "This is not about being tough on crime. This is about treating people fairly and about welcoming back people trying to put their lives together again and become good citizens," said Beshear. The move restores the former policy that existed under Beshear's predecessor, Ernie Fletcher. "This disenfranchisement makes no sense," Beshear said. "It makes no sense because it dilutes the energy of democracy, which functions only if all classes and categories of people have a voice, not just the privileged, powerful people." Currently, Kentucky denies the right to about 129,000 citizens, including one in four African Americans, the governor's press release stated. For additional coverage, see Pol Watchers and the Kentucky Post. International: U.N. Body Recommends U.S. Restore Voting Rights The United Nations' Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination today called on the U.S. to automatically restore voting rights to people with felony convictions upon completion of their criminal sentence, and raised concern that such policies have a disparate racial and ethnic impact and may be in violation of international law. "The Committee remains concerned about the disparate impact that existing felon disenfranchisement laws have on a large number of persons belonging to racial, ethnic and national minorities, in particular African-American persons, who are disproportionately represented at every stage of the criminal justice system," concluded the Committee in their recommendations to the U.S. Government. To view a copy of the Committee's recommendations, please visit: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cerd/docs/co/CERD-C-USA-CO-6.pdf. National: Rate of Disenfranchisement Higher for African-American Women The Sentencing Project has just released an analysis of the rate of disenfranchisement of women in the United States. Key findings of the report include: At yearend 2004, there were an estimated 792,200 women ineligible to vote as a result of felony disenfranchisement laws - a 17 percent increase since 2000. Further, the analysis finds that "given the disproportionate rate at which African-American women are under supervision in the criminal justice system, their rate of disenfranchisement is considerably higher than for non-African-American women." National: ACLU Aims to Help with 'Toolkit' The ACLU has released "Right to Vote: A Campaign to End Felony Disfranchisement," a felon enfranchisement tool kit to aid organizations in voter education efforts. Sample bills, public education resources and opinion editorials are featured in the 72-page resource manual. The document also features recent successful campaigns resulting in legislation and policy reform, how-to tips, and what to lobby for depending on each state's current laws. National: U.S. Needs to Restore "Democratic Expression" On OpEdNews.com, Chris Lugo, Progressive Candidate for US Senate wrote his views in support of reforming felony disenfranchisement laws nationally. Pointing to last year's JFA report, "Unlocking America," and the recent Pew report which found that 1 in 100 American are incarcerated, Lugo points out that America's priorities are misguided and reform must be implemented. He writes: "Limiting the right to vote only further punishes men and women who are working hard to become members of society in good standing, it affects the outcome of national and local elections and is an undue burden on the poor and minorities. It also has a deeper cost that cannot be measured. Restoring the right to vote doesn't just affect our basic democratic expression, it also has profound effects on that individual's sense of self and their sense of identity. It impacts on the sense of fairness and justice of the entire society." - - - - - - Help The Sentencing Project continue to bring you news and updates on disenfranchisement! Make a contribution today. Contact Information -- e-mail: [email protected], web: http://www.sentencingproject.org
Blog

Is Your Vagina Drug-Free? Albany's Narcs Want to Know

Here's an especially sordid and sickening example of abusive policing in the name of the drug war. A young woman driving in the wrong part of Albany gets pulled over by a special, aggressive drug enforcement squad, the Street Drug Unit. As the Albany Times-Union explains:
ALBANY-- The cops in the marked patrol car had circled through West Hill a couple times keeping an eye on their female target. They were part of the Street Drug Unit, an aggressive squad assigned to help rid Albany's neighborhoods of drug dealers and addicts blamed for much of the city's problems. It was early evening and already dark when the patrol car's emergency lights flashed in the rearview mirror of Lisa Shutter's Mitsubishi sedan on Quail Street, just off Central Avenue. Police records show the officers called out a "Signal 38" to alert a dispatcher they were onto something suspicious and about to pull someone over. They would later write in a report that they had pulled her over for "failure to signal," although no ticket was issued, according to police records shared with the Times Union. The actions of police in the minutes that followed would end in controversy rather than with an arrest. They would also leave Shutter, a 28-year-old single mother from Ravena, shaken and angry after one of the officers allegedly inserted his finger into Shutter's vagina on a public street during an apparent search for drugs. When it was over, "I pulled off down the road and I just cried for probably a half hour," Shutter said. "I called my dad. ... I felt like I had been basically raped."
Sounds pretty horrendous, but then, so is the response from the Albany police when Shutter filed a complaint:
The incident has triggered an ongoing internal affairs investigation by the Albany Police Department. But the handling of that investigation has raised questions about whether the department has sought to cover up the incident. Shutter claims Burris Beattie, a commander in internal affairs, dissuaded her from reporting the incident to a civilian police oversight board. The board, which was formed in 2001 in response to community concerns about the handling of internal police investigations, is empowered to monitor cases involving claims of brutality and civil rights violations against any officer. "He said they (internal affairs) would do a better job," Shutter said, recounting her conversation with Beattie. "He said they would like to keep it 'internal' ... that that's how they like to handle things."
Good thing they kept it aware from the civilian police review board, because it would have gotten to the bottom of things, right? Well, maybe not. It seems that the Albany board is as toothless and feckless as the rest of those organizations that are supposed to provide oversight to law enforcement:
Jason S. Allen, acting chairman of Albany's Citizens' Police Review Board, did not respond to a request for comment about whether all civilian complaints against officers are forwarded to the board. Instead, someone from the review board, which maintains an office at Albany Law School, contacted the department two weeks ago and alerted them that a Times Union reporter was asking questions about their policies, according to a police department source.
Let me get this straight: The civilian police review board, which is supposed to keep an eye on police misconduct, but when the board is contacted by reporters about an alleged incident, it doesn't investigate, but instead alerts the department? With review boards like this…But wait, there's more:
A member of the Citizens' Police Review Board, who spoke on condition of anonymity because only the chairman is authorized to make public statements, said some members of the board have privately suspected that the department may be hiding cases of police misconduct. In other instances, the internal affairs reports are so poorly organized and investigated the board has had trouble reaching decisions and often sends them back for more investigation. The board is supposed to appoint a monitor for complaints involving civil rights violations or allegations of excessive force. "Whether the letter of the law says that this should be the process, the intent and spirit of the law mandates that, especially in cases of civil rights violations, they be submitted to us for review," the board member said. "If not this, what do we review? ... The fact they would dissuade someone from reporting an incident and say they would do the investigation better completely defeats the purpose of why we were created."
One of the two officers involved, Matthew Fargione, is the son of a former Albany narc who is a long-time buddy of the chief, James Tuffey. Fargione Sr. used to be Tuffey's boss on the narc squad. The other officer was Nick Abrams. While Shutter said police internal affairs told her one of the officers had been suspended, apparently that is untrue. Here's how it went down, according to the Times-Union account:
The incident unfolded just after 7 p.m. on Dec. 22. Shutter said she'd just finished some last-minute holiday shopping and became confused as she drove through West Hill looking for a friend she'd agreed to pick up that night. Shutter was behind the wheel of a friend's rented car, and said she saw the police car drive past her twice before the stop. The officer at her window grilled her about drug use and hidden crack pipes, she said. "You fit the profile," the officer said, according to Shutter. "You're a white girl in a rental car." She told the officer she had no drugs and offered to take a Breathalyzer test, but he declined to give one, she said. The officer then allegedly reached through her window and plucked Shutter's cellphone from her lap. He scrolled through the personal information in her phone, she said, asking questions about "private calls" and someone named "Mandie," whose name appeared on her contacts' list. Mandie Buxton, 28, who is Shutter's friend since childhood, was at home when her cellphone rang that night. The man calling identified himself as an Albany police officer and asked whether Shutter was supposed to be picking Buxton up that night. "I said: 'What are you talking about?' " Buxton said. "He said: 'You don't know what I'm talking about?' and then he hung up. I called right back and no one answered." Ordinarily, police need a search warrant to seize or access someone's telephone. Before it was over, Shutter was ordered to stand outside her vehicle with her hands on the trunk. One officer searched her body while a second scoured the inside of the car. They also dumped the contents of her purse and asked whether she'd spent her money on crack because her wallet was empty. Shutter said she never consented to a search of her vehicle, her telephone or her body. She said she pleaded with the officer who allegedly slid his hand down the back of her jeans, and inside her underwear, to stop. "I kept saying over and over ... 'If you have to search me, can you bring me to the precinct?' " Shutter said. A female officer was called to the scene and informed Shutter she was there to search her body, Shutter said. The female officer patted her down, lifted Shutter's sweater and felt along her bra strap, and made Shutter open her mouth and lift her tongue. No reason was given. The police found no drugs or other evidence of criminal wrongdoing before allowing Shutter back in her car. "He said 'you're lucky' ... and that I better not drive around there again," Shutter said. Shutter called Buxton and her father minutes later, crying hysterically, they said. Shutter's mother, Sherry, characterized her daughter's encounter with police as a "life-changing nightmare at the hands of an Albany police officer." "Our daughter did not deserve to be so grossly violated and I want the officers to comprehend and be held accountable for violating our child," she said. "I just keep telling her that 'you did not deserve this.'"
One question: How many other women have been sexually assaulted by these criminals in blue? Another question: Is it okay for women to be digitally raped by cops if there are drugs in their vaginas? This story isn't going over too well in Albany, either. Check out the responses by Albanyites (Albanians?) at the Time-Union's blog page.
Blog

Vancouver's seventh homicide is another gang hit

"I guess it happens everywhere".That's what the neighbor of our latest gang land hit said to the BCTV reporter asking her about the shooting death of a 20 year old Asian male on Sunday,March 9,'08."Ni
Blog

The Bitch

Way back in the dark ages,when addiction was considered a plague and the police and the courts thought they could arrest their way out of the drug problem.There was a law introduced that was intended
Event

Marijuana Policy Project Happy Hour and/or Soccer Sign-up

Please join the Marijuana Policy Project on Thursday, March 20, from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., at Madam's Organ in Adams Morgan.

As per the bar's Thursday night custom of supporting area nonprofits, $1 from each drink sold and 20% of food sales during the event will go to MPP, so please invite your friends to eat and drink in support of ending marijuana prohibition!

In The Trenches

Join MPP for Happy Hour and/or for League Soccer

[Courtesy of MPP]

Please join the Marijuana Policy Project on Thursday, March 20, from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., at Madam's Organ in Adams Morgan.

As per the bar's Thursday night custom of supporting area nonprofits, $1 from each drink sold and 20% of food sales during the event will go to MPP, so please invite your friends to eat and drink in support of ending marijuana prohibition!

We'll also be giving away MPP literature, selling MPP merchandise, and raffling off a few decks of MPP's exclusive “The Deal on Marijuana Policy Reform” playing cards.

non-mmj playing cards

What: MPP Happy Hour
When: Thursday, March 20, 5:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m.
Where: Madam's Organ, 2461 18th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20009

And MPP's Rob Kampia is looking to put together an MPP soccer team for the Washington D.C. Jewish Community Center's league. Games are played on Sunday mornings and afternoons from April through July. Come to the happy hour, or e-mail him at [email protected] if you're interested. You can find more information about the league here.

We look forward to seeing you — and all of your friends — on the 20th for happy hour and this spring for soccer!

In The Trenches

Prison Art Magazine (March 2008) Features Inmate Mustard Art, Pano, Watercolors, More

[Courtesy of Prison Art Gallery] View the March Edition of Art for Justice, the Prison Art Magazine of the Prison Art Gallery at http://prisonsfoundation.org/marafj.pdf The new edition of Art for Justice features striking samples of Pano art from our extensive collection of this unique art form. Pano art is made by prisoners using handkerchiefs and bedsheets and is a prison tradition. Own a unique Pano today at a very special price. Also featured in the March issue of Art for Justice is extraordinary prison artist Anthony Curtis Dye. Anthony is incarcerated at Dooly State Prison in Georgia where, due to lack of art supplies, he is forced to become extremely creative in the fine art he produces. For example, he draws and paints on paper bags and cardboard scraps with paints created from materials such as wax, instant coffee, white out, mustard, creamer and spinach. "Wish I had a brush," he says. No matter, the results are unique and of museum quality. View and purchase one of his works now at a fraction of their worth. You will also find in the March issue of Art for Justice a selection of specially priced and beautifully matted prison art prints. There are 51 to choose from, ranging from landscapes to portraits to prison themes. At only $15 each (the custom matting alone is worth that), they are a steal. Purchase anything from the March issue of Art for Justice and they will be shipped to you anywhere. Or get them at our Prison Art Gallery, 1600 K Street NW, Suite 501, Washington, DC. Open everyday, M-F 9-5, Sat & Sun 1-5. For further information, please email [email protected] or call 202-393-1511.