Latest
A Christmas Carol
Drug Reform Groups Win $25,000 Facebook Contest, Get Rejected by Chase Bank
When Chase Bank announced a vote-based $5 million charitable give-away on Facebook, you can imagine the excitement that erupted among cash-strapped non-profits and their supporters. The idea was to let the public vote and decide democratically what charities deserve a little extra support in a tough economy. The top 100 vote-getters in the first round were to receive $25,000 each, and as you'd expect, drug policy groups performed quite well.
Unfortunately, Chase Bank didn't approve of some of the winners, so they changed the rules:
At least three nonprofit groups â Students for Sensible Drug Policy, the Marijuana Policy Project and an anti-abortion group, Justice for Allâ say they believe that Chase disqualified them over concerns about associating its name with their missions.
The groups say that until Chase made changes to the contest, they appeared to be among the top 100 vote-getters.
"They never gave us any indication that there was any problem with our organization qualifying," said Micah Daigle, executive director of Students for Sensible Drug Policy. "Now theyâre completely stonewalling me." [NYT]
Clearly, Chase entered into this without fully appreciating the political implications of using new media as the centerpiece of a philanthropic PR campaign. The whole episode is now reminiscent of the public votes at Obama's Change.gov website, in which legalizing marijuana repeatedly became the most popular policy idea. If you go out of your way to give the public a voice, sometimes you'll be surprised by what you hear. But isnât that the point?
Of course, neither Chase Bank, nor the White House, bear any legal obligation to honor the political ideals they've solicited from the public. But that's not the issue here. The whole purpose of an online vote is, rather obviously, to create the appearance of genuine fairness, to let the people decide for themselves what matters most (as Chase boasted proudly in the contest's motto: âYou Decide What Mattersâ). By arbitrarily overturning the results, Chase irrevocably tarnishes the fundamental concept behind their effort and trivializes the exact public values the program was intended to respect and uphold.
By daring to reject drug policy organizations who'd obviously won the contest, Chase Bank sends an unambiguous message of disrespect to our movement. If they think this issue is politically volatile, they're absolutely right, but they picked the wrong side. Fixing our drug laws has become one of most prominent struggles at this moment in American politics, and it's a debate you can't simply opt out of while simultaneously draping yourself in the flag of online democracy.
If we're powerful enough to win in a fair fight, that means we can also burn those who cheat us. Our friends at SSDP won't be patronizing Chase Bank anytime soon, and I hope you'll join them.
Holiday wishes from MPP to you
Dear friends:
|
May all your wishes come true. Happy holidays from MPP. |
Sincerely,
Rob and all of us at the Marijuana Policy Project
P.S. If you would like to learn more about what you've helped us accomplish this year, please read our list of the top 10 signs of progress in 2009.
Â
Sensible Colorado: Exciting Speakers Announced for Saturday!
|
|
Americans for Safe Access: December Activist Newsletter
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
An Open Letter From A Fresno, CA Medical Marijuana Patient
Appeal: Did You Know That We Are WINNING?
Credit where none is due
NJ Medical Marijuana Patient Convicted, Faces 5-10 Years in Prison
Somerville- The jury returned a not guilty verdict to John Wilson on the first-degree felony charges against him. But the MS patient could still face time in prison after being found guilty of second-degree charges of âManufacturingâ marijuana and third-degree possession of hallucinogenic mushrooms. Â
If he had been convicted of "operating and maintaining a marijuana production facility" John would have faced a minimum of 15 years in state prison. That could have amounted to a death sentence for the 37 year old because of the degenerative nature of the disease. [Examiner]
So it could've been worse, but it's awfully hard to get excited about a result that could still send a seriously ill patient to prison. I guess the mushroom possession didnât help, but shrooms should be legal anyway and I'm sure he found them helpful or he wouldn't have had them.
Let's hope this less-than-worst-case scenario doesnât suck any momentum from the effort to get Wilson pardoned and pass medical marijuana legislation in New Jersey to prevent such injustices in the future.
The Year on Drugs 2009: International Drug Policy Developments
West Coast Weed Wars: Legalizing Legislators Come Out Swinging
Law Enforcement: This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories
Pagination
- First page
- Previous page
- …
- 507
- 508
- 509
- 510
- 511
- …
- Next page
- Last page

