Skip to main content

Latest

Blog

Obama to Reconsider Federal Blockade Against Medical Marijuana Research

Wow, it's almost hard to keep up. Here's yet another potentially major breakthrough on the medical marijuana front:

Days before President Bush left office in January, his administration fired a parting shot at Professor Lyle Craker's eight-year quest to cultivate marijuana for medical research by abruptly denying him a federal license despite a nearly two-year old Drug Enforcement Administration law judge's recommendation that he receive one.

But the new administration led by President Obama, who has publicly backed the use of marijuana for medical purposes to stave off pain, might reverse the decision and keep Craker's license application from going up in smoke.

A source familiar with the case said the White House will likely demand that the decision be reviewed.

"Basically they want to do an autopsy of what occurred and have it go through a proper review," the source said. [National Journal]

Anonymous sources can be misleading, so I called Aaron Houston at MPP, who told me the story is true and graciously did not request anonymity.

Of course, it remains to be seen whether the administration's review ultimately results in reversal of the research blockade, but the fact that they're looking into it is a very positive indication. It should prove difficult to examine this issue without seeing it for what it is: a prolonged and transparently dishonest effort to obstruct medical marijuana research by preventing researchers from producing marijuana and denying them access to existing sources.

Given yesterday's reaffirmation of Obama's pledge to respect state medical marijuana laws, it seems that a positive pattern has emerged here. The new administration is re-evaluating the issue from multiple angles and finding that medical marijuana has been mishandled at the federal level in more than one way. It's tremendously encouraging to see the executive branch taking interest in corrupt political obstructionism at the DEA. I'd encourage them to expand the inquiry beyond just medical marijuana.
Blog

Attorney General Holder Says Feds Will Respect State Medical Marijuana Laws

At a press conference yesterday:

U.S. Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr. said Wednesday that the Justice Department has no plans to prosecute pot dispensaries that are operating legally under state laws in California and a dozen other states -- a development that medical marijuana advocates and civil libertarians hailed as a sweeping change in federal drug policy. [Los Angeles Times]

This should remove doubt once and for all about the direction the new administration is heading with regards to medical marijuana. There's been some confusion about this, but Holder himself has been consistent in maintaining that medical marijuana providers operating legally under state law will be left alone.

The biggest remaining question is what will become of unresolved criminal cases initiated during the Bush administration. Charlie Lynch, whose recent federal conviction has become a national controversy, will be sentenced next week. Lynch and others like him are lingering casualties in a war that's been called off at the highest levels of government. The president and attorney general are on the right track, but the job isn’t done until the innocent victims of the war on medical marijuana are set free.
Chronicle

Reportaje: Al reunirse en Viena, Comisión de Estupefacientes de ONU se prepara para seguir en el mismo sendero prohibicionista, pero la disidencia habla más alto

Esta semana la Comisión de Estupefacientes (CE) de la ONU se reunió en Viena para redactar una declaración política y un plan de acción para guiar las políticas de drogas internacionales durante la próxima década. Aunque los prohibicionistas hayan ganado al fin, la disidencia está hablando cada vez más alto y poniéndose cada vez más poderosa.
Chronicle

Semanal: Blogueando en el Bar Clandestino

“Nombran a nuevo secretario antidroga, que hace comentario ridículo”, “Diez años después, labores antidrogas de las Naciones Unidas no han logrado nada”, “NBC insulta a usuarios de marihuana”, “Alerta de propaganda: Marihuana te deja malvado en los videojuegos”, “¿Será que los republicanos se vuelven en contra de la guerra a la droga?”, “Fiscales federales parecen confundidos respecto a política de marihuana medicinal de Obama”, “¿Por qué los demócratas se quejan del consumo de drogas de Rush Limbaugh?”, “Policía con sombrero de vaquero habla sobre legalización de las drogas en Al Jazeera”, “Anuncian ganadores de concurso de vídeos y carteles sobre reforma de las políticas de drogas”, “Contemplando la legalización de la marihuana”.
Chronicle
Chronicle
Chronicle
Chronicle
Chronicle

Reducción de daños: Proyecto de ley del Buen Samaritano de Estado de Washington protegería a los que lleven amigos que sufren sobredosis a recibir atención médica

A veces las personas que sufren sobredosis farmacológicas se mueren porque sus compañeros o tardan a buscar asistencia sanitaria o no toman ninguna providencia por miedo de que los arresten. Nuevo México tiene una ley que proporciona inmunidad limitada a la gente en esas circunstancias. Ahora un legislador de Washington espera convertir su estado en el segundo a aprobar dicha ley.
Blog

DEA Mexico Chief Reyes Lists Reasons To End Marijuana Prohibition

Blog

Former Drug Czar Doesn't Care if you Grow Marijuana


From our friends at SSDP, here's video of former drug czar Barry McCaffrey sounding strangely agnostic about the marijuana debate:



It's really a remarkable statement from a guy who presided over a massive escalation of the war on drugs. He says now that he's "not in public life" he doesn't care anymore. So I guess as drug czar he was just doing his job? Unbelievable.

Blog
Blog

The Debate Over Medical Marijuana Should Have Ended a Decade Ago

NORML's Paul Armentano has a piece at reason marking the 10th anniversary of the government-funded Institute of Medicine report, which proved beyond any doubt that marijuana is medicine. The debate should have ended right then, but our opponents adopted a desperate strategy of claiming that the report said something other than what it clearly said.

Fortunately, the American people took matters into their own hands we've made tremendous progress over the past decade towards increasing patient access and changing the tone of the debate. Our opponents have almost entirely conceded marijuana's medicinal value and now resort to the pathetic fallback position of saying that smoking is bad and patients should take THC pills instead.

We've been proven right morally, scientifically and even politically. But it's still amazing to think that only a few short years ago our opponents were still claiming that marijuana wasn't medicine. Now that everyone knows those people were dead wrong, it's worth considering how phenomenally irresponsible it really was to withhold the truth about a medicine that could have helped people.

Paul makes an important point that after years of legal medical access in several states, anyone can plainly see that opponents of medical marijuana weren't just wrong about science. They were wrong about every single bad thing they said would happen if medical marijuana became legal. Many of those people are still considered experts on drug policy. They shouldn’t be.
In The Trenches

Press Release: NH House Committee Passes Medical Marijuana Bill 13-7

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE   
MARCH 18, 2009

NH House Committee Passes Medical Marijuana Bill 13-7

Bill Would Make New Hampshire 14th State to Protect Seriously Ill Medical Marijuana Patients from Arrest

CONTACT: Matt Simon, NH Coalition for Common Sense Marijuana Policy, (603) 391-7450

CONCORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE — The New Hampshire House Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs Committee voted 13-7 to recommend passage of a bill today that would allow seriously ill patients to use medical marijuana if their doctor recommends it. The vote by the full committee came after a three-member subcommittee voted 2-1 in favor of the bill.

    Today's vote means the bill, HB 648, will now go to the House floor for a full vote by the chamber with the committee's "ought to pass" recommendation. The bill is sponsored by Rep. Evalyn Merrick (D-Lancaster).

    The committee's strong statement of support provided medical marijuana patients with a boost of confidence. Clayton Holton, a muscular dystrophy patient from Somersworth, said the vote made him feel hopeful that he'd be able to live the rest of his life in New Hampshire. "I'm happy that my family may not have to move to a state that allows medical marijuana," he said.

    Thirteen states already have medical marijuana laws which effectively protect qualifying patients from arrest and help them safely access marijuana. Michigan became the most recent last year when 63 percent of voters passed its medical marijuana law by ballot initiative. Of the 11 states that have collected such data, not one has seen youth marijuana use rates increase after establishing a medical marijuana law. In fact, each of those states, including California, has actually seen youth marijuana rates decline, in some cases dramatically.

    In 2007, a bill similar to the one currently under consideration was defeated by only nine votes – an incredibly slim margin considering it had been negatively recommended by the committee that today voted to approve HB 648. However, a 2008 Mason-Dixon poll showed that 71 percent of New Hampshire voters support such a law, and medical marijuana advocates say legislators have learned a lot in two years about both medical marijuana and medical marijuana policy.

    "The committee studied the bill very diligently, and now it has placed its stamp of approval on a well-written, responsible bill," said Matt Simon, executive director of NH Common Sense Marijuana Policy, which supports the bill. "It was a good day for democracy." 

###

In The Trenches

Kellogg's is Ignoring You

You Can Make a Difference

 

 

Dear Friends,

The Kellogg's public image has taken a huge hit, after the company refused to renew Michael Phelps' contract because of his marijuana use. The advertising industry's own leading journal recently reported that Kellogg's treatment of Phelps was more damaging than the peanut recall.

This is your opportunity to let Kellogg's know they're behind the times and to demand a meeting.

They aren't listening to reason. Despite my repeated attempts to secure a meeting with Kellogg's staff and our partner organizations in drug policy reform, they won't even sit down to discuss the matter.

You and I both know that the tides of change are sweeping the country, and Americans by and large no longer support punishing people for what they put in their bodies. We simply can't afford it.

Together, we've swamped Kellogg's with emails and phone calls, and now we can demand they listen.

Sincerely,




Ethan Nadelmann
Executive Director
Drug Policy Alliance Network