Dope and Diplomacy in Dublin: European Union Conference Tries to Lay Groundwork for Continental Drug Strategy 5/21/04

Drug War Chronicle, recent top items


recent blog posts "In the Trenches" activist feed


More than 200 European drug experts (and some international observers) gathered in Dublin, Ireland, on May 10 and 11 as part of the European Union's effort to develop a continental drug strategy for the next five years. The conference, "EU Strategy On Drugs – The Way Forward," was designed to "facilitate an exchange of ideas between all participants and to agree on conclusions and recommendations on the main elements of a future EU drugs strategy," according to the EU's Justice and Home Affairs council.

But it didn't quite work out that way, according to Joep Oomen, who attended as an invited representative of ENCOD, the European NGO Council on Drugs (, an umbrella grouping of drug reform groups throughout Europe. Not only were no conclusions reached, Oomen reported, some governments reacted harshly to ENCOD's presence and the harm reduction and drug reform agenda it represented.

Oomen participated in a plenary panel session early in the conference, where he broached the topic of ending the drug war. "I was the only panel member to propose a fundamental change of logic in drug policy by referring to the need to start creating political 'room for maneuver' for policies that are not based on prohibition," ENCOD's representative reported.

That same plenary panel then viewed a video featuring drug reform activists and experts, including activists Andria Efthimiou-Mordaunt and Danny Kushlick from Britain and Jan van der Tas from the Netherlands, as well as British harm reductionist David Liddell. Academics featured in the video were Tomas Zabransky from the Czech Republic, Mike Trace from Britain, and Krzysztof Krajewski from Poland. All called on viewers "to work toward a review of existing policies," reported Oomen.

That was a bit much for some of the more prohibitionist governments in attendance, who reacted vociferously during the panel's discussion period. "The first three governments to react – Belgium, Italy and Greece – immediately protested against my presence," Oomen wrote. "The Belgian government even used the word 'scandalized' to describe their feelings on my presentation and the content of the video, accusing the organizers of being extremely biased in their choice of speakers. They also felt scandalized by the fact that ENCOD had dared to use the EU symbol in our flyer" (

Joep Oomen
With the hot rhetoric becoming the talk of the conference, wrote Oomen, other reform-resistant governments grew irritated. "Some governments, especially Sweden, Italy, France and even Germany, were quite outraged about the fact that the call for change in drug policies had been at the center of attention in the morning," he reported. That anger manifested itself in the conference's remaining workshops, where some representatives were positively "Pavlovian," Oomen wrote. "Every time the word harm reduction was mentioned, they would fly up and state that this could not be the objective of EU drug policy, which still had to be based on reduction of drug consumption etc."

This is an odd position, given that harm reduction is already part of official European Union drug policy. When it adopted the current action plan in June 2000 at the European Council of Santa Maria da Feira, the EU explicitly embraced harm reduction. "The plan notably refers to reducing the adverse consequences of drug use," explains the EU's Justice and Home Affairs Commission. "This means that harm-reduction measures such as needle-exchange programs or providing treatment as an alternative to imprisoning problem users are encouraged."

The current EU drug strategy sets six main targets:

  • reduce significantly over five years the prevalence of drug use, as well as new recruitment to it, particularly among young users under 18 years of age;
  • reduce substantially over five years the incidence of drug-related health damage (HIV, hepatitis, TBC, etc.) and the number of drug-related deaths;
  • increase substantially the number of successfully treated addicts;
  • reduce substantially over five years the availability of illicit drugs;
  • reduce substantially over five years the number of drug-related crimes;
  • reduce substantially over five years money laundering and the illicit trafficking of precursors.
"All the best available evidence suggests that of these six objectives, only one can be said to have met with some success: an increase in the number of persons treated," ENCOD noted in its formal presentation to the conference, before casting a skeptical eye even at drug treatment. "But isn't this is a dubious achievement, if we recognize that many of the individuals who go into treatment do so only because they wish to avoid sanctions or fines after being detained by police for minor quantities of illicit drugs? Can we point to success if in fact many of these people do not really need treatment at all, as surveys in several countries reveal to be the case?"

Although presentations were given by a number of drug experts, politicians, and police types, reported Oomen, there was little such talk in Dublin, at least not formally. Instead, there were many cries for more research (and more funding) and more international law enforcement cooperation. The relative sterility of the debate, said Oomen, was because Sweden, Italy, Belgium, France and Germany refused to enter into real discussion. "Their goal seemed mainly to sabotage the debate, to make sure no mention was made that would open the Pandora's box [of legalization]." That left "a bitter aftertaste" among participants, he noted.

It was different in the hallways, said Oomen. "Meanwhile, several representatives came to me and said that on a personal title, they agreed with lots of the things we were saying. Especially the representatives of the new EU Member States were very positive, saying that they did not agree with the Belgian representative. They said that from own experience, they knew all too well how 'civil society' is treated by authorities and that the future is ours."

Oomen also reported "positive talks" with Irish, Dutch, Slovenian, Czech, Finnish, Cypriote, Slovak, Bulgarian and Hungarian, European Commission and Council of Europe delegates, and "even a constructive conversation with someone from the Swedish Ministry of Justice, who also said that he found the drug debate too dogmatic." The 100 copies of the formal ENCOD statement to the conference were also quickly grabbed up, he said. "In personal conversations, one could feel however that even repressive governments (like Denmark and Sweden) do not have a real response to the argument that more law enforcement on drugs means more money to organized crime. They typically respond by saying that we do not have a proposal of how to do things in a post-prohibition system, and as long as we do not have answers to many questions on how such a system could function they will never take us seriously."

And so it goes as the EU plods toward a new drug strategy. The EU 2005-2008 action plan on drugs must be designed by October for final approval in the spring of 2005. And ENCOD's Oomen remains optimistic despite the apparent rigidity in the halls of the EU. The action plan will include an evaluation of the current drug strategy, and the facts are not the side of the prohibitionists. "We already know that these will be favorable for our cause," Oomen told DRCNet.

Read Oomen's complete report and the ENCOD Dublin presentation online at and respectively.

Read about European Union drug strategy online at:

Read about the European Union drug action plan online at:

-- END --
Link to Drug War Facts
Please make a generous donation to support Drug War Chronicle in 2007!          

PERMISSION to reprint or redistribute any or all of the contents of Drug War Chronicle (formerly The Week Online with DRCNet is hereby granted. We ask that any use of these materials include proper credit and, where appropriate, a link to one or more of our web sites. If your publication customarily pays for publication, DRCNet requests checks payable to the organization. If your publication does not pay for materials, you are free to use the materials gratis. In all cases, we request notification for our records, including physical copies where material has appeared in print. Contact: the Drug Reform Coordination Network, P.O. Box 18402, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 293-8340 (voice), (202) 293-8344 (fax), e-mail [email protected]. Thank you.

Articles of a purely educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of the DRCNet Foundation, unless otherwise noted.

Issue #338, 5/21/04 Editorial: Benefit of the Doubt | Vermont Becomes Ninth State to Legalize Medical Marijuana – Other States See Progress and Setbacks | Not With a Bang but a Whimper: California Pain Doctor Frank Fisher Exonerated in Last Criminal Case | Needle Exchange in New Jersey? Atlantic City Says Yes, Attorney General Says No | Dope and Diplomacy in Dublin: European Union Conference Tries to Lay Groundwork for Continental Drug Strategy | Announcing: "The New Prohibition: Voices of Dissent Challenge the Drug War" – New Compendium by Sheriff Masters Features David Borden and Numerous Other Thinkers on Drug Policy | Newsbrief: New Jersey Student Sues Over Drug Tests, Expulsion | Newsbrief: Drug War Invades Ultimate Frisbee | Newsbrief: One in 11 US Prisoners Doing Life, Study Finds | Newsbrief: This Week's Corrupt Cops Story | Newsbrief: Bill to Reform Harsh Tennessee Marijuana Sales Law Dies Lonely Death | Newsbrief: Afghan Government Concedes It Includes Traffickers | Newsbrief: Rural Maryland Cops Force Students to Disrobe During Drug Raid | Web Scan: Ron Paul, Mayor Campbell, Westword, Nature, ACLU-TX Task Force Report, New DPFMA Web Site | Job Opportunity – Research Assistant, Office of Legal Affairs, Drug Policy Alliance, Oakland, California | The Reformer's Calendar

This issue -- main page
This issue -- single-file printer version
Drug War Chronicle -- main page
Chronicle archives
Out from the Shadows HEA Drug Provision Drug War Chronicle Perry Fund DRCNet en Español Speakeasy Blogs About Us Home
Why Legalization? NJ Racial Profiling Archive Subscribe Donate DRCNet em Português Latest News Drug Library Search
special friends links: SSDP - Flex Your Rights - IAL - Drug War Facts the Drug Reform Coordination Network (DRCNet)
1623 Connecticut Ave., NW, 3rd Floor, Washington DC 20009 Phone (202) 293-8340 Fax (202) 293-8344 [email protected]