Latest

The Unvarnished Truth About the Drug War From the Drug Truth Network Cultural Baggage for 04/01/09, 29:00 Cliff Schaffer, founder of DrugLibrary.org and MarijuanaBusinessNews.com discusses how we steer the discussion on how to end the drug war + Terry Nelson of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition & the Abolitionists Moment LINK: http://www.drugtruth.net/cms/?q=node/2358 Century of Lies for 03/29/09, 29:00 Dr. David Duncan, professor emeritus at Brown University details the contaminants contained in recreational drugs + Phil Smith of Stop the Drug War with the Corrupt Cop Story LINK: http://www.drugtruth.net/cms/?q=node/2356 Programs produced at Pacifica Radio Station KPFT in Houston, 90.1 FM. You can Listen Live Online at www.kpft.org - Century of Lies, SUN, 8 PM ET, 7 PM CT, 6 PM MT & 5 PM PT: Next: Roger Goodman state rep in Washington - Cultural Baggage WED, 12:30 PM ET, 11:30 CT, 10:30 MT & 9:30 AM PT: NEXT: Guest TBD Hundreds of our programs are available online at www.drugtruth.net, www.audioport.org We have potcasts, searchability, CMS, XML, sorts by guest name and by organization. We provide the "unvarnished truth about the drug war" to scores of broadcast affiliates in the US, Canada and Australia! Check out our latest videos via www.youtube.com/fdbecker Please become part of the solution, visit our website: www.endprohibition.org for links to the best of reform. "Prohibition is evil." - Reverend Dean Becker, Drug Truth Network Producer 713-849-6869, www.drugtruth.net

ENCOD BULLETIN ON DRUG POLICIES IN EUROPE The central most important outcome of this year’s Commission on Narcotic Drugs (from 11 to 19 March in Vienna) is that the pretension of consensus on global drug policy has been shattered. At the end of the "High Level Segment" of this CND (with heads of state and ministers), it was clear that there is a deep rift between the countries that signed the drug treaties. After months of vainly trying to agree on the subject of Harm Reduction (HR) during the preparation for this CND, on the meeting itself this came to a climax when the majority of countries succeeded in keeping the term HR out of the Political Declaration (PD), and in replacing it by the idiotic wording “related support services”. How serious the situation is was made clear by the decision of almost all European countries to let Germany present a statement at the closing session on 12 March, to the effect that these countries interpret the words “related support services” to mean “Harm Reduction”, the way they have been doing it for many years. This led to a number of statements by Russia, Japan, Pakistan and others who didn’t accept this departure from what they considered consensus. As to the American position, contrary to other observers, I found it reasonable, critical, but not rejecting the German statement. The rift within the UN drug “control system” is not only about Harm Reduction. Human Rights may prove to be even more contentious. During the last week of CND there was a lot of indignation when Singapore officially defended itself against criticism of violations of human rights, and asserted its position. Singapore claims the right to corporal punishment for drug convicts and even to impose the death penalty. Many organizations objected to this because, according to UN opinion, the death penalty is disproportionate to the crime. I think it is better to point out that the idea of a uniform global drug policy is an illusion, than to argue about the death penalty. Developments in drug policy that we find necessary (such as regulation of the cannabis market in the Netherlands) should not be dependent on first reaching agreement on a subject that is dominated by deeply different cultural and religious beliefs and convictions. Some countries think the real drug war still has to start, other countries want to end it. The countries that are committed to Harm Reduction want to continue on this path, but are obstructed in developing their drug policy by countries that prefer to let drug users die, or simply kill them. This makes clear that it is impossible to maintain a uniform global drug policy, and it provides us with a strong argument to get rid of global drug prohibition. Before the start of the CND it was still unclear whether there would be a new opportunity for a meeting of NGO’s with Antonio Maria Costa, the Executive Director of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). On the second day of the High Level Segment, on 12 March 2009, a meeting of this sort was announced as an “Open Dialogue”. In this meeting, I reminded Costa of his announcement of a discussion paper on the availabilty of cannabis and its consumption in the Netherlands, and asked him what happened to that discussion paper. This was filmed by the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union, HCLU, again, this time from far away because suddenly there were new rules. Costa said that his report on the Netherlands was “/quashed/”. I didn’t hear this clearly enough, because then, I should have said that there apparently was a difference of opinion with the Dutch government. What I did say was that we need a discussion paper, with sources and references. He simply reiterated that he had answered in his blog and in the press conference, the day before - which was only open for press. I said he was not doing his work properly. At that point, the chair wanted to continue with the next question. The year of reflection that was supposed to end at this CND, obviously hasn’t been used the way it should have been. Mike Trace, formerly of UNODC and now the central figure of the International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC), foresaw this. In an article for the Guardian, he wrote "/we’re about to see the international community walk up the political and diplomatic path of least resistance. It will do nothing to help the millions of people around the world whose lives are destroyed by drug markets and drug use. And the depressing thing about it is that we can all book our seats for 2019, to go through this charade again/." CND 2009 should be the beginning of a year of real reflection. As ENCOD stated before: a moratorium on drug policy must be declared, at least until CND 2010. The pretension that there is consensus on drug policy has proved to be false. Now we need to get rid of the existing global uniform system. I am optimistic, but I am also realistic. I am convinced that we’re winning, and that our opponents are on the defensive. For a very long time, our big challenge was to get the topic of alternatives on the agenda. Right now this is happening, in Latin America, in the Netherlands, in the USA, and many other places. I think that the definitive blow to prohibition will be dealt in the USA. Not in Europe. It is a pity, but we’ll have to accept that. There is a salient change in public opinion on drug policy in a number of countries, and especially in the USA. The best things that happened in the last weeks were the article by Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron and the video interview with him on CNN. When the USA discontinues drug prohibition, many countries will quickly and gladly follow suit, Miron said. Our job is to simply keep the pressure on politicians and continue to do what we have been doing for many years. There is a stream of development now that cannot be stopped anymore. I want to end with a mail that Chris Conrad sent to his friends on 12 March: *Morales chews Coca leaf at UN anti-drug conference* I was so proud to be in the room yesterday when Bolivian President Morales defied the UN anti-drug convention and chewed a coca leaf in front of the UN conference. A roar of applause greeted his action as he told the UN that coca is part and parcel of the culture of Bolivia; we can prevent trafficking, he told the conferees, but we cannot do away with coca leaf and coca chewing. I hope for the day when I will see someone do something similar with a cannabis cigarette... I felt like this is really history in the making; the unravelling of the Drug War. Protestors on the outside, Morales on the inside and confusion as to what the US policies will be, plus many statements that the policy will need to be reviewed again soon and should not stand for 10 years, after all. Viva. (Chris Conrad ) By Fredrick Polak (with the help of Peter Webster) (Fredrick Polaks accreditation to the UN meeting was made possible by the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network)

Dear Friends, We recently added many improvements to our website, including regular updates to our popular "News You Can Use" section. New "unique ID" web-site counter, gives you a unique and easy way to win prizes. Just visit Prisons Foundation and view your unique visitor number at the bottom of the page. If you are the 500th, 1000th of 1,5000 visitor (or any interval of 500th visitors) you win your choice of our prison related music CD! If you visitor number on the counter shows you to be a winner, simply email us at [email protected] and let us know which of the following CD's you would like us to send you as a prize: • Prison Tracks: Instrumental guitar duets recorded in prison by Steve Andrew and Dennis Sobin. • A Stitch in Time: (a Lloyd S. Rubin Production) A moving holocaust musical written in prison by Lee Amirault and Dennis Sobin When contacting us with your "visit" number please be sure to include the full name and address where you would like your CD prize to be sent. Also note the approximate time of your visit to our website so we can verify your visitor ID. Thank you for your continuing interest and support of our work; and good luck! Yours for justice, Dennis Sobin #206757 C.T.F. D-3B #10 1901 E Street SE Washington, D.C. 20003 A CALL FOR SUPPORT: The Prisons Foundation is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization based in Washington, DC that promotes the arts and education in prison and alternatives to incarceration. We are now accepting tax deductable donations. The support of our supporters, quite bluntly, is what keeps us going. Please consider making a tax deductible donation to the Prisons Foundation so that we may continue to promote the arts in prison and help encourage the wonderful atistic talent we cultivate everyday: *Note the views in this letter are those of Dennis Sobin. Please send your comments directly to him.