Latest
Embarazo: Proyecto de Misuri para penalizar a futuras madres que consumen drogas sufre severo escrutinio, proyectos parecidos en Tennessee son estrangulados
Exámenes toxicológicos: Se estrangula proyecto bastante divulgado de Virginia Occidental para someter a beneficiarios de prestaciones sociales a exámenes
Comunicado de prensa: Diputados Barney Frank y Ron Paul introducen proyecto de ley sobre cultivo del cáñamo
5 blocks from here
Honoring Good Cops Doesnât Mean Ignoring Bad Ones
Via Radley Balko, it looks like the story is getting more interesting. The Philadelphia Daily News obtained surveillance video from one of the stores, which shows officers sabotaging security cameras. While the video doesnât catch officers actually stealing anything, it certainly doesn't look good that they're cutting wires on security cameras right before the alleged theft took place. The video also shows that the paraphernalia purchase cited on the search warrant never actually took place. Uh-oh.
The bottom line is that these cops are more than just a little bit dirty. They are insanely corrupt. And yet, the last time I wrote about this, someone actually complained about it in the comment section:
The majority of the criminals out there are bad mouthing the police organization because they are upset they got busted. Documented are thousands of cases where police acted as heroes and law enforcers; no one seems to want to report or testify on their behalf, so I am. I respect the law enforcement organizations for what their true goals are and strongly suggest that people such as your selves find a new line of work.
Yeah, I'll stop complaining about police misconduct when police stop committing outrageous crimes. I appreciate good police work as much as anyone, but I won't ignore or forgive horrible misconduct just because other cops are doing their job. Most bus drivers aren't alcoholics, but that doesn't mean every incident of drunk bus driving should become a celebration of all the heroic bus drivers who don't go to work wasted.
One crooked cop is one too many. And if the good cops canât get rid of the bad ones, then they're not exactly perfect either.
Decriminalization is a Huge Success in Portugal
On Friday, I had the opportunity to hear Glenn Greenwald speak at the Cato Institute regarding his Cato-sponsored report, Drug Decriminalization in Portugal: Lessons for Creating Fair and Successful Drug Policies. You can read the report here and Cato also has a downloadable MP3 of the event.
The back-story here is that Portugal implemented an across-the-board drug decriminalization policy back in 2001. There's been very little discussion and research regarding its impact, hence Cato recruited Greenwald (a genius and extremely popular political blogger) to study Portuguese drug policy. His findings thoroughly illustrate the efficiency of decriminalization towards addressing key drug policy goals, while refuting the myth that removing harsh penalties will lead to increased consumption.
The whole thing utterly shatters most, if not all, arguments that continue to be advanced in support of tough drug laws here in the U.S. and around the world. I found a couple points particularly interesting:
1. When Portugal began looking at alternative policies to address a growing drug problem, they did not consider legalization because it was determined that such a policy would violate international treaties. It's a small country that can't afford to be belligerant. This just goes to show, once again, the extent to which prohibition is not a consensus policy at the international level, but rather an idealogical approach that less powerful nations have been forced to accept.
2. The decision to implement a decriminalization policy emerged through discussion of empirical data, rather than emotional arguments about morals, civil liberties and so forth. I don't know how representative this is of what approach would be most effective in establishing more reasonable policies here in the U.S., but it's certainly worth taking a look at the context in which decriminalization triumphed over other policy options.
4:20 Drug War NEWS + Century of Lies! 04/06/09
The Sentencing Project: Disenfranchisement News -- Removing the 'Poll Tax'
ALERT: #399 Medicinal Marijuana Is Legal in Michigan
Press Release: FAMM Cheers Passage of Rockefeller Drug Law Reform

Â
Â
Press Release:Â April 3, 2009Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
Contact: [email protected]Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
Â
FAMMÂ Cheers Passage of Rockefeller Drug Law Reform
Changes Further "Smart on Crime" Sentencing TrendWASHINGTON, D.C. - Families Against Mandatory Minimums (FAMM), a national advocacy organization dedicated to reforming mandatory minimum sentencing laws, today applauds New York state leaders responsible for approving legislation that substantially overhauls and reforms New York's Rockefeller drug laws, once the toughest in the nation. FAMM also congratulates the efforts of families, incarcerated and formerly incarcerated individuals and advocates who made these changes possible.
The agreement, included as part of the New York budget bill, now awaits Governor David Paterson's signature. It will restore judicial discretion in many drug cases, expand drug treatment and alternatives to incarceration, and provide retroactive sentencing relief for people serving prison time for low-level drug offenses. It also allows approximately 1,500 people incarcerated for low-level nonviolent drug offenses to apply for resentencing and increases penalties for "drug kingpins" and adults who sell drugs to young people.
Deborah Fleischaker, director of state legislative affairs of FAMM, issued the following statement in response to today's news:
"New York's decision to eliminate its draconian Rockefeller laws marks a step toward policies that are both tough and smart on crime. Mandatory minimum sentencing laws are a driving force in skyrocketing prison populations. Many states and the federal government followed New York's lead and enacted mandatory minimums in the 1970s and 1980s, believing these "one-size-fits-all" sentences would dry up the drug supply and eliminate drug addiction. Sadly, mandatory minimums in New York and elsewhere have the opposite effect, filling our prisons with drug addicts instead of drug kingpins, and causing the erosion of faith in the fairness of the criminal justice system because of severe racial disparities caused by these laws.
Being tough on crime is not enough. States must figure out how to protect public safety, without wasting thousands of lives and millions of dollars. By repealing the Rockefeller drug laws, New York has just taken an enormous step toward finding that balance.
New York has joined the growing wave of states that recognize the harm caused by mandatory minimum sentencing. From Michigan's elimination of most of its drug mandatory minimum laws, to Nevada's decision to repeal mandatory sentencing enhancements, to Pennsylvania's decision to have its Sentencing Commission study the effectiveness of mandatory minimum sentences, states are waking to the idea that mandatory minimum sentences lead to bloated budgets, fail to protect public safety, and are bad criminal justice policy.
Contrary to the claims of those who oppose these reforms, removing the mandatory minimum sentences for drug crimes is not "soft on crime." Politicians need to concern themselves with crafting smart criminal justice policies, instead of settling for the expensive and unworkable status quo. The New York reforms, though long overdue, are good news for New Yorkers and the rest of the nation. A recent report by Pew Center on the States shows why.  One in 31 Americans are under some form of criminal justice control - in prison, on probation or on parole - and one in 100 are in prison or jail. The cost of this overreliance on corrections is staggering - last year it was the fastest expanding major segment of state budgets, and over the past two decades, its growth as a share of state expenditures has been second only to Medicaid. State corrections costs now top $50 billion annually and consume one in every 15 discretionary dollars."
Families Against Mandatory Minimums is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that supports fair and proportionate sentencing laws that allow judicial discretion while maintaining public safety. For more information on FAMM, visit www.famm.org or contact Monica Pratt Raffanel at [email protected].
##
Sentences that Fit. Justice that Works.
Policial: Las historias de policÃas corruptos de esta semana
Reportaje: Lo bueno, lo malo y lo feo â La reforma de la legislación Rockefeller sobre la droga de Nueva York está a punto de ser aprobada
Marihuana medicinal: Comunidad cannábica de Oakland ofrece ayuda a ciudad con impuestos
The Only Way To Win The War On Drugs Is To Stop Fighting It
Pagination
- First page
- Previous page
- …
- 636
- 637
- 638
- 639
- 640
- …
- Next page
- Last page