Skip to main content

Latest

Blog

Opponents of Medical Marijuana Should Just Give Up

This month has brought some of the most high-profile backlash we've seen since Obama's new medical marijuana policy took effect. DEA raids of a grower and two laboratories in Colorado as well as an escalating campaign by the Los Angeles DA to completely prohibit sales on his turf have again raised the stakes in a debate that many believed was almost over.

Given the rich history of obstructionism and demagoguery we've learned to expect from hard-line drug warriors, none of this is terribly surprising. But in light of the current political climate, it's really rather unclear what the opposition's gameplan is. Who's calling the shots? What's their motive? How do they expect this to play out? Having lost one public battle after another, it seems the anti-medical marijuana crusaders would want to perform some sort of cost/benefit analysis before wading once again into the political waters where they've been slowly drowning for a decade now.

Does the DEA really want to defend raiding laboratories that do nothing but test cannabis for harmful impurities? What law-enforcement interest is served by this? They tried to frame it as an administrative matter necessitated by the lab's formal permit application, but they sure as hell didn't make an appointment before crashing in there. Maybe they're more interested in the clients than the lab itself, but even if you had a database of every medical grower in the state, what would you do with it? Arresting even one of them is a political minefield.

Similarly, Los Angeles DA Steve Cooley's efforts to ban sales are so far out of step with everything around him that it's just impossible to guess what he hopes to accomplish. Even Attorney General Brown's guidelines explicitly permit distribution and there's no question at all where the people of California stand on this. Cooley is playing with fire here and he should really get a hold of himself before his madness becomes Exhibit A for the full-legalization campaign that's hitting the ballot in California this Fall.

Under Bush, I tended to assume that periodic raids and harassment were a political strategy aimed at confusing legislators in prospective medical marijuana states, but the new DOJ policy preemptively nullifies whatever dubious value that tactic may have had. Presently, it seems that medical marijuana's most impassioned enemies are at war with an inevitable reality. This isn't going to go away because nobody wants that except you. A career in law-enforcement offers many opportunities to be a hero, but this isn’t one of them.
Blog
In The Trenches

RAID RESPONSE: Trainings this week


RAID RESPONSE:  Trainings around the state this week

 

 Sensible Colorado is excited to welcome national experts from Americans for Safe Access (ASA) to Colorado to lead a number of important trainings this week.


See the workshop schedule below.
In response to recent raid activity, ASA Executive Director Steph Sherer and ASA CA Director Don Duncan will host special dispensary staff trainings and community response meetings.

Community Response Meeting:
This FREE meeting is open to all community members that want to participate in a coordinated response during and after raids. During this meeting, we will create a step-by-step community response to raids (rallies, protests, media, alert system), assign roles and tasks, and create a mechanism for ongoing outreach for community support.

Raid Preparedness Training:
This training will walk dispensary staff through protocols that they can have in place to make any law enforcement encounter as successful as possible.


Being ready can help keep a bad situation from getting worse - and it may keep staff and patients out of jail. Participants learn how to prepare in advance, how to stay safe when the police show up, and what may happen afterwards. This cutting edge training includes role plays and tools to create an effect raid plan at your dispensary.  (There is a $50 per person fee that will be collected onsite at the training)
Mark your calendar!  We will send out more specifics later this week.
 

Friday February 26th (Denver)
4:00-6:00p  Raid Preparedness Training
7:00-9:00p  Emergency Response Community Meeting
 

Saturday February 27th (Grand Junction)
4:00-6:00p  Raid Preparedness Training
7:00-9:00p  Emergency Response Community Meeting
 

Sunday February 28th (Colorado Springs)
4:00-6:00p   Raid Preparedness Training
7:00-9:00p  Emergency Response Community Meeting
 

Monday March 1st (Ft. Collins)
4:00-6:00p   Raid Preparedness Training
7:00-9:00p  Emergency Response Community Meeting

Also, thanks to all our supporters that attended the protest during President Obama'a visit last week.  See a picture of the action here.

Blog

War on Drugs Pales in Comparison to Legalized Health Care Industry

In 1971, the American government took its first step in the War on Drugs when President Richard Nixon declared the beginning of what would become a four-decade battle. Since then, according to Esquire Magazine, its costs have ballooned to $52.3 billion dollars in taxpayer funds and 15,223 dead in 2009 alone. But the truly egregious fact is that the government, on one hand, punishes offenders for minor offenses, yet sanctions and encourages the $291 billion dollar prescription drug industry because it is backed by powerful lobbyists on K Street. Deadly Combination
photo credit: RESchroeder The situation has become so sordid that almost 50 million Americans are uninsured, according to health insurance provider, "Affordable Health Insurance." These Americans are growing quickly as a result of the economic malaise of 2008-2009, and because they pay inflated prices for government-sanctioned drugs they've opted not to pay the equally inflated premiums for health plans with prescription coverage. It's time for Congress to act and stop the untrammeled, exponential growth in drug costs by ending the War on Drugs and legalizing certain non-debilitating and clinically proven drugs on the free market. After all, a free market will ensure lower prices for all, lower health care costs, and a better quality of life.
In The Trenches

Drug Truth 02/22/10

Cultural Baggage * Century of Lies * 4:20 Drug War NEWS Cultural Baggage for 02/21/10 29:00 Casper Leitch, host of Time4Hemp invites DTN host Dean Becker as guest, Abolitionist's Moment & Request for Respondents to Pain Killer Survey LINK: http://www.drugtruth.net/cms/node/2787 TRANSCRIPT: ASAP Century of Lies for 02/21/10 29:00 Dr. Rick Doblin, Pres. of Multidisciplinary Association of Psychedelic Studies + Keith Stroup of NORML from Time4Hemp program LINK: http://www.drugtruth.net/cms/node/2788 TRANSCRIPT: ASAP 4:20 Drug War NEWS, 02/22 to 02/28/10 Link at www.drugtruth.net on the right margin - Sun - Dr. Rick Doblin re K2 the synthetic marijuana Sat - Dr. Rick Doblin, Pres. of Multidisciplinary Association of Psychedelic Studies Fri - Dean Becker guests on Time4Hemp 2/2 Thu - Casper Leitch, host of Time4Hemp invites DTN host Dean Becker as guest Wed - Drug War Pissing Contest Winner/Loser Tue - Advice from Dr. Hochman + Request for Respondents to Pain Killer Survey Mon - Abolitionist's Moment & American Dream Programs produced at Pacifica Radio Station KPFT in Houston, 90.1 FM. You can Listen Live Online at www.kpft.org - Cultural Baggage Sun, 7:30 PM ET, 6:30 PM CT, 5:30 PM MT, 4:30 PM PT (Followed Immediately By Century of Lies) - Century of Lies, SUN, 8 PM ET, 7 PM CT, 6 PM MT & 5 PM PT Who's Next to "Face The Inquisition?": Richard Lee, founder of Oaksterdam University Hundreds of our programs are available online at www.drugtruth.net, www.audioport.org We have potcasts, searchability, CMS, XML, sorts by guest name and by organization. We provide the "unvarnished truth about the drug war" to scores of broadcast affiliates i You can tune into both our 1/2 hour programs, live, at 6:30 central time on Pacifica's KPFT at http://www.kpft.org and call in your questions and concerns toll free at 1-877-9-420 420. The two, 29:00 shows appear along with the seven, daily, 3:00 "4:20 Drug War NEWS" reports each Monday morning at http://www.drugtruth.net . We currently have 72 affiliated, yet independent broadcast stations. With a simple email request to [email protected] , your station can join the Drug Truth Network, free of charge. Check out our latest videos via www.youtube.com/fdbecker Please become part of the solution, visit our website: www.endprohibition.org for links to the best of reform. "Prohibition is evil." - Reverend Dean Becker, DTN Producer, 713-462-7981, www.drugtruth.net
In The Trenches

US Launch of "Cannabis Policy: Moving Beyond Stalemate"

NEW STUDY REVEALS FAILURE OF US NARCOTICS POLICY THE BECKLEY FOUNDATION ISSUES NEW BOOK “CANNABIS POLICY: MOVING BEYOND STALEMATE” CALLING FOR CHANGE IN THE PROHIBITIONIST MODEL Oxford University Press, February 2010 – An international team of the world's leading drug policy analysts convened by Amanda Feilding, Director of the Beckley Foundation, have written a book analyzing cannabis prohibition policies. Their conclusion is that criminalization has failed to reduce consumption. The book also shows no link between prevalence and cannabis policy – be it liberal or draconian. Cannabis has become widely used and prohibition policies as implemented have only proven to be expensive, intrusive on individual privacy, and socially divisive. The book outlines a full spectrum of alternative policies from depenalization to a fully regulated legal market. Half a century of prohibition has failed to prevent a rise in global cannabis use, which has transformed consumption from a relatively rare behavior confined to a scattering of cultures and countries to almost a rite of passage amongst the Western world’s youth. Prohibition has led to the development of large scale criminal markets that increase the harms of cannabis use and undermine social order. Moreover, a criminal justice approach to cannabis control causes considerable social harms and facilitates discriminatory enforcement against the young and ethnic minorities. “This book clearly shows that prohibitionist policies have not only failed to meet their objectives but have inflicted significant social harms,” says Amanda Feilding Director of the Beckley Foundation. “Efforts to change the current system have been met with stiff resistance from such leading countries as the United States, which is in the company of countries like Russia, China and Sudan.” Criminalisation has not acted as a deterrent, whereas, with a regulated market, the product could be labeled for strength and chemical composition, thereby making it safer. Government could also control and tax its sale, which would provide extra funding for education and treatment. The book is calling for a significant change by adopting a less punitive approach. Countries like the Netherlands and Portugal that have pursued liberal drug policies have not seen consequent increase in cannabis consumption, as staunch prohibitionists argued it would. Instead these countries have experienced reductions in the financial costs associated with criminalization policies, and have reduced the adverse social consequences arising from criminalization strategies. While a number of U.S. states[1] have downgraded the criminal status of marijuana possession offences, and in some cases passed medicinal marijuana exceptions[2], US Federal law severely limits the options most states have to change their drug policies. As states such as California and Colorado seek to develop regulations and tax models for marijuana, policymakers should closely analyze, evaluate and draw inspiration from similar systems and models developed in other countries as described in the book. “The real value of the research we have conducted lies in the breadth of the review of experiences around the globe. It shows the range of different options - local, regional, and national - government can take to reduce the adverse effects of prohibition,” explained Peter Reuter, Director, Program on the Economics of Crime and Justice Policy at the University of Maryland and one of book’s five co-authors. “It is finally time for governments around the world to readdress cannabis policy and to avoid approaches that have been proven to fail.” This month Robin Room, one of the authors, Peter Reuter and Amanda Feilding will be making their case to political leaders in Washington DC, Mexico, Brazil and Argentina. The Beckley Foundation is a charitable trust founded in 1998 by Amanda Feilding, Lady Neidpath. It aims at investigating consciousness and its changing states from a multidisciplinary perspective. Through its Science Programme the Foundation initiates, develops and conducts world-class research that will improve our scientific understanding of consciousness and provide practical information to help optimize health and well being. The Foundation also conducts a Drug Policy Program and is dedicated to providing a rigorous, independent review of global drug policy, aiming at reducing the harms associated with both the misuse of drugs and the policies that aim to control them. The intention of the Foundation is to help develop policies that are evidence-based and rational, rather than those that are ineffectual, due to being rooted in unsubstantiated ideology. CONTRIBUTORS Robin Room is a sociologist and Professor at the School of Population Health, University of Melbourne and is the director of the Centre for Alcohol Policy Research. He is also a professor at and was the founding director of the Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs at Stockholm University. Benedikt Fischer is Professor in the Faculty of Health Sciences and the School of Criminology, as well as Interim Director of the Centre for Applied Research in Addictions and Mental Health (CARMHA), at Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada, where he also currently holds a CIHR/PHAC Research Chair in Applied Public Health and is a MSFHR Senior Scholar Career Investigator. Wayne Hall is a Professor of Public Health Policy at the School of Population Health, University of Queensland. He has advised the World Health Organization on the health effects of cannabis use and other illicit drug related health issues. Peter Reuter is an economist, Senior Economist at RAND and is a Professor at the School of Public Policy and in the Department of Criminology at the University of Maryland. He has served as a consultant to numerous US, European, and UN agencies and founded and directed RAND's multidisciplinary Drug Policy Research Center from 1989-1993. Simon Lenton is a Professor and Deputy Director at the National Drug Research Institute, Perth, Western Australia, and he works as a Clinical Psychologist in private practice. Amanda Feilding is the founder and director of the Beckley Foundation. The Foundation has produced over 35 much-cited academic reports, proceedings documents and briefing papers on key drug policy questions.
In The Trenches

Action #4: Share the science!

 

Dear friends,

An $8 million state-funded research effort on medical cannabis has just come to an end.  As written in today's Los Angeles Times:

"Investigators report that cannabis can significantly relieve neuropathic pain and reduce muscle spasms in MS patients. More research is urged."

The California-funded Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research sponsored 14 studies at University of California campuses.

Will you help share the science?

The following link (http://bit.ly/9XCmXc) is a mini-link to the article.  Please take a few minutes to copy and paste this link wherever you can.  Put it on your Facebook page, send it via twitter, forward it to friends.

Find places online where opponents of safe access are making their claims.  Post the article there as well. 

It is time for opponents of safe access to learn the growing science behind medical marijuana.  You can help.

Thanks -

The ASA Team

Americans for Safe Access

Please support ASA!

On The Web:

ASA's Mission

ASA Forums

ASA Blog

Take Action

ASA's Online Store

"Gear up" for medical cannabis activism with ASA's new T-shirts, hats, stickers, bags and more! All proceeds go to ASA advocacy

Blog

Employment Discrimination Against Medical Marijuana Patients Must End

If 80% of Americans support medical marijuana, why do we keep hearing stories like this one:

Jane Roe has suffered from severe migraines for years… Jane tried every prescription drug imaginable but none gave her relief. She finally found the answer after receiving authorization for medical marijuana from a doctor. Not long after that, Jane was hired at a company called TeleTech. Her position involved answering customer service calls for Sprint at TeleTech's Bremerton office. Jane was up front about her situation with the company from the very start.

Roe: "I knew that I already had medical marijuana; I didn't want to have to hide it. So I went to the Human Resources Department and provided them with a copy, they said they did not want one. They told me to still go take the drug test."

Jane did as she was asked and then began her training program. On her tenth day, she was called out of the training. She was told her drug test had come back positive and she would have to leave immediately. Jane felt humiliated. [KUOW.org]

She's not the one who should be embarrassed by this. TeleTech is the second company this month to get ugly press attention for discriminating against patients. In the current political climate, only an idiot would want their business associated with this sort of reckless cruelty and prejudice.

Unfortunately, those enforcing such arbitrary policies are still hiding behind claims of conflicting laws and vague liability concerns. It might be totally incoherent, but it goes to show how federal intransigence continues to leave patients vulnerable to abuse despite improvements in enforcement policy. It's time for the White House to move beyond the argument that medical marijuana raids are a "poor use of resources," and directly acknowledge that medical use is a basic human right.

Even the worst drug warriors will be the first to insist that patients aren't arrested and jailed in the war on medical marijuana. Shouldn't firing patients from their jobs be considered comparably reprehensible?
Blog

Is it Time for Mexico to Cut a Deal With the Drug Cartels? Jorge Castaneda Wonders If It Hasn't Happened Already

The Winds of Change: Drug Policy in the World opened yesterday in Colonia Napoles, a ritzy area of Mexico City. I would have blogged about it yesterday, but I was in the conference all day long, and in the evening, I attended a related event where they plied us with wine, so I never got around to it. Former Mexican foreign minister Jorge Castaneda got it all started in fine provocative form. He suggested during the opening session that Mexico needs to go back to the "good old days" of rule by the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), at least when it comes to dealing with drug trafficking organizations. The PRI, of course, ruled Mexico in a virtual one-party state for 70 years before being defeated by Vicente Fox and the conservative National Action Party (PAN) in the 2000 elections. It was widely (and correctly) seen as not fighting the drug trade so much as managing it. Fox, under whom Castaneda served, started to move against the cartels, and his successor, Calderon, accelerated the offensive by bringing in the military in a big way. The result has been a bloody disaster, with Mexico being wracked by an ever mounting death toll as the army and federal police wage war on the so-called cartels, the cartels wage war on the police and the army, and when they're not busy killing cops and soldiers, turn their guns on each other. And the drugs keep flowing north and the guns and cash keep flowing south. Perhaps it is time to return to a quiet arrangement with the cartels, Castaneda suggested. "How do we construct a modus vivendi?" he asked. "The Americans have a modus vivendi in Afghanistan," he noted pointedly. "They don't care if Afghanistan exports heroin to the rest of the world; they are at war with Al Qaeda." Castenada's comments on Afghanistan rang especially true this week, as American soldiers push through poppy fields in their offensive on Marja. The US has made an explicit decision to arrive at a modus vivendi with poppy farmers, although it still fights the trade by interdiction and going after traffickers—or at least those linked to the Taliban. President Karzai's buddies, not so much. Casteneda also came up with another provocative example, especially for Mexican leftists in the audience. "We had a modus vivendi with the Zapatistas in Chiapas," he noted. "We also pretended they were real guerrillas with their wooden rifles. We created a liberated zone, and the army respected it, and it's still there. But it is a simulation—the army could eliminate it in 90 seconds." And in yet another provocative comment on the theme, Casteneda suggested that somebody may already have arrived at a modus vivendi with the Sinaloa Cartel—a suggestion that is getting big play in Mexican newspapers these days. "Why is it that of the 70,000 drug war prisoners in Mexico, only 800 are Chapo Guzman's men?" he asked. "Many people think the government has made a deal with the Sinaloa cartel. I don't know if it's true." This isn't the first time Castaneda has made provocative statements in recent months. At the Drug Policy Alliance conference in Albuquerque in November, he said bluntly that the Mexican military is committing extrajudicial executions of drug gang members and blithely repeated the charge when called on it. All of the Mexicans I've been talking to think Castaneda has political ambitions. Perhaps he's angling for a cabinet appointment in the next presidency or perhaps he's getting ready to run for political office himself. In any case, he certainly has no problem stirring things up when it comes to making allegations about what's going on beneath the surface in Mexico's drug war. Stay tuned for some more blog posts about the conference, which ended just a couple of hours ago. Now that it's done, I have some time to write about it.
In The Trenches

Press Release: Medical Marijuana Bill Passes New York Senate Health Committee

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                                                                                                                 

FEBRUARY 23, 2010

Medical Marijuana Bill Passes New York Senate Health Committee

CONTACT: Kurt A. Gardinier, MPP director of communications … 202-905-0738 or [email protected]

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, the New York State Senate Health Committee passed S. 4041-B, the Senate’s medical marijuana bill. This marks the second consecutive year that the bill has gotten out of the Senate Health Committee. The Assembly’s medical marijuana bill, A. 9016, passed the Health Committee last month and is now sitting in the Assembly Codes Committee.

         “We applaud the New York Senate Health Committee members for doing the right thing and taking this important step toward protecting sick and dying New Yorkers from arrest or jail,” said Noah Mamber, legislative analyst with the Marijuana Policy Project. “Let’s hope New York legislators will follow the lead of New Jersey, the state next door, which is about to become the 14th state to implement an effective medical marijuana law.”

         The New York State Assembly passed medical marijuana legislation in 2007 and 2008, but the issue has never gotten a Senate floor vote. For the first time in 2009, a Senate medical marijuana bill passed the Senate Health Committee, but progress stalled because of the Senate leadership struggle, which lasted until just before the legislature recessed.

         With more than 29,000 members and 124,000 e-mail subscribers nationwide, the Marijuana Policy Project is the largest marijuana policy reform organization in the United States. MPP believes that the best way to minimize the harm associated with marijuana is to regulate marijuana in a manner similar to alcohol. For more information, please visit www.mpp.org.

####

Blog

Federal Policy on Medical Marijuana is Still a Confusing Mess

I'll be the first to tell you that medical marijuana is in a better position politically than ever before. Even the recent ugliness in Colorado doesn't approach what we've seen in years past (and you know it's true so don't accuse me of Obama-worship or naivety). But the fact remains that the current federal rules of engagement are impossibly vague and will inevitably become deeply problematic for both sides.   

LA Times explains perfectly why this is so:

The confusion can be resolved only by Washington. Fourteen states currently have medical marijuana laws, and more are likely to adopt them, multiplying the legal disarray exponentially.

The new policy of respecting state laws is already helping to expand the medical marijuana map (NJ, DC), yet the feds still claim the right to intervene at their own discretion. DEA enforcement against clear violations of state law might be tolerated politically, but their active involvement becomes less sustainable as new states enter the picture. As long as DEA maintains its authority to enforce local regulations, any inaction on their part will inevitably resemble tacit approval. It makes far more sense to step aside entirely and let state police and state courts take full responsibility for interpreting and enforcing their own laws.

If the White House wants to shield itself from political fallout over medical marijuana, the quickest and easiest approach is to get out of the game altogether.