Skip to main content

Latest

Latest News
Blog

Eighty-Year-Old US-Mexico Drug Program is Far Over Budget

A DRCNet member who blogs at the Daily Kos, among other places, sent me a fascinating article he found recently in the New York Times web archive about the US-Mexico drug war. According to the article, titled "US to Join Mexico in Fight on Drugs" and published in May 1925:
The drug treaty which will be formulated in El Paso by the Commissioners of the United States and representatives of the Mexican Government Is expected to achieve two results -- elimination of the constant stream of drugs which Is pouring into the United States through Mexico and helping to clean out from the border towns several groups of American and foreigners who 'have made large sums of Money through the drug traffic.
Eight two and a half years later, President Bush has proposed spending another $1.5 billion on the drug war south of our border. But according to the US General Accountibility office:
According to the US interagency counternarcotics community, hundreds of tons of illicit drugs flow from Mexico into the United States each year, and seizures in Mexico and along the US border have been relatively small."
Can we agree at a minimum that this project is far over budget?
Event
Event

Panel: The Global Politics of Harm Reduction

This panel seeks to provide an overview of the issues and challenges to the policies of harm reduction, both globally and domestically, with the goal of fostering discussion and reflection as to how we can advance this work in meaningful and effective ways. Although the focus will be on harm reduction policies specific to drug use, the panel will also explore the main tenets of harm reduction as applicable to other areas of public health.
In The Trenches

3 of 8 Democratic candidates would end criminal penalties for marijuana

[Courtesy of MPP]

Marijuana policy reform made a brief appearance during last week's televised debate among the Democratic presidential candidates. When moderator Tim Russert asked for a show of hands to indicate which candidates disagreed with Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd's support for marijuana decriminalization, all the candidates except Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich raised their hands. (Former Alaska Sen. Mike Gravel — who supports legalizing marijuana — was excluded from the debate.)

When asked why he wouldn’t support decriminalization, former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards pulled out an old saw: “Because I think it sends the wrong signal to young people. And I think the president of the United States has a responsibility to ensure that we're sending the right signals to young people.”

You can watch the short exchange here.

While the candidates are behind the curve on that aspect of marijuana policy, the good news is that they're with us (and the majority of Americans) on medical marijuana.

MPP has secured promises from all eight Democratic candidates — as well as two of the eight Republican candidates — to end the federal raids on medical marijuana patients in the 12 states where medical marijuana is legal.

Please check out our report card on the presidential candidates here.

Reps. Kucinich, Ron Paul (R-Texas), and Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.), as well as former U.S. Sen. Mike Gravel (D-Alaska) and New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson (D), have all garnered “A+” grades for their excellent positions on medical marijuana.

For more information on these candidates, visit their campaign sites:

• Mike Gravel for President 2008
• Kucinich for President 2008
• Ron Paul 2008 — Hope for America
• Richardson for President
• Tancredo for a Secure America

Thank you for your support of MPP’s efforts to make medical marijuana a major campaign issue in 2008. Together we will end the federal government’s war on the seriously ill.

Sincerely,

Rob Kampia
Executive Director
Marijuana Policy Project
Washington, D.C.

In The Trenches

Want to work at the Marijuana Policy Project?

[Courtesy of MPP] 

I'm writing to you because MPP currently has several D.C.-area job openings that I'm hoping you or someone you know might be interested in.

Additionally, if you'd like to be notified about future job opportunities at MPP, please subscribe to our job notices e-mail list, by visiting www.mpp.org/jobs and following the subscription instructions toward the top of the page.

Membership Assistant

MPP is seeking a Membership Assistant to research prospective donors, which involves substantial Internet research, and to keep MPP's database up-to-date. This is an excellent opportunity for a meticulous, detail-oriented person to play a crucial and responsible role in a successful nonprofit organization.

State Policies Intern

MPP is also seeking a part-time intern to work in our State Policies Department, which is devoted to reforming marijuana laws on the state level through direct lobbying. The intern will monitor news for marijuana-related articles, post relevant news articles on each of MPP's state Web pages, and assist in various administrative tasks. This is an unpaid internship for 10-20 hours per week.

Temps

Additionally, MPP is always seeking people interested in doing temp work. Temps are paid $9/hour and have flexible schedules. Responsibilities include data entry, stuffing envelopes, and other administrative tasks.

Candidates should visit www.mpp.org/jobs for detailed job descriptions and instructions for applying. (Interviews are being conducted on a rolling basis, so interested applicants should apply as soon as possible.)

Please forward this message to anyone who you think might be interested as well. Thank you!

Chronicle

Editorial: Two Drug War Tragedies, and No Excuse

When the drug fighters intervene forcefully in people's lives, the results can be unpredictable and tragic. But there are better ways to deal with drugs than the drug war. And so there are no excuses either.
In The Trenches

Press Release: Denver Marijuana Initiative Wins 57-43

[Courtesy of SAFER] For Immediate Release: November 8, 2007 Contact: Mason Tvert, SAFER, 720-255-4340 Denver Marijuana Initiative Wins 57-43 Mayor John Hickenlooper says the city will follow the new law and create city panel to implement it DENVER -- Election officials have finished counting the votes and an initiative making adult marijuana possession the city's lowest law enforcement priority -- Initiated Question 100 -- has been approved 57-43. In light of the city's overwhelming support for the measure, Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper announced yesterday that he would appoint a Marijuana Policy Review Panel to ensure that the new ordinance is implemented to the greatest extent possible, as well as to study and report on its effects. The 11-member panel will include: • One (1) at-large member of the Denver City Council • One (1) representative of the Denver Police Department • One (1) representative of the Denver County District Attorney's Office • One (1) representative of the Denver City Attorney's Office • Three (3) criminal defense attorneys, one of whom shall be a public defender • Two (2) residents of the City of Denver, as selected by the petitioner committee that initiated this ordinance • One (1) drug/alcohol abuse prevention counselor • One (1) member of the Denver Metro Domestic Violence Fatality Review Committee who is not also a member of law enforcement Statement from Mason Tvert, the lead proponent of Initiated Question 100: "We are glad to see our mayor and city officials will be respecting the will of the voters, and we look forward to working with them toward a more sensible marijuana policy in the City of Denver. Although these officials say adult marijuana possession is already a low priority, it could undoubtedly be lower. For example, the City of Seattle, which adopted a very similar lowest law enforcement priority measure in 2003, handled just 125 cases of adult marijuana possession in 2006, whereas Denver -- a city with fewer residents -- handled nearly 1,400. As an example, one can look to Missoula, Montana. There, a similar lowest law enforcement priority measure was approved by voters last year. Just a couple weeks ago officials there adopted an official policy directing police to stop arresting adults for simple marijuana possession and make such cases the absolute lowest priority for prosecutors. We strongly believe Denver policies should reflect the fact that every objective study on marijuana has concluded that it is far less harmful than alcohol to both the user and to society. As we have said repeatedly, there is no logical reason why adults should punished for making the rational, safer choice to use marijuana instead of alcohol."
Event

Free "American Drug War" Screening

Please join us for a screening of AMERICAN DRUG WAR. This will be a very special event! We will be dedicating the screening to Claudia Jensen - activist, pediatrician, and warrior against the powerful elite that fight so hard to keep marijuana illegal. ADW participant, friend and associate, Dr. Claudia Jensen lost her life to breast cancer on September 15, 2007, may she rest in peace. Special guest speakers include Judge Gray, T. Rodgers, Kevin Booth, and Joe Peitri.
In The Trenches

The Sentencing Project: Disenfranchisement News & Updates - 11/8/07

Florida: Technology Aids State's Long-term Restoration Process State officials met with residents with felony convictions last week in an effort to describe Florida's new voter restoration policy, review cases and alert individuals of their voting status, Florida Today reported. Laptops were set up to review cases on the spot and how-to pamphlets and hotline numbers were distributed. "Florida gets it, and we are doing things differently now," said Janet Keels, of the Florida Parole Commission. In April, the executive clemency board eased the voting restoration process for those with non-violent records. The state is currently deciding rights restoration eligibility for nearly one million residents. National: Disenfranchisement Litigation Efforts Need Reform In an article published in the Journal of Law and Social Change author Daniel M. Katz argues for a new litigation strategy to reform disenfranchisement policy by using the Voting Rights Act (VRA). Katz contends that using the VRA in the context of Article 1, Section 4 of the Constitution provides a new opportunity to challenge current policy, and that "statutes imposing lifetime disenfranchisement on all felons are per se violative of the totality of circumstances test" of the VRA. He also argues that Congress has the "unambiguous constitutional authority to pass a statute which enfranchises felons for the Congressional portion of the election ballot." - - - - - - Help The Sentencing Project continue to bring you news and updates on disenfranchisement! Make a contribution today. Contact Information, email: [email protected], web: http://www.sentencingproject.org
Chronicle
Chronicle
Chronicle
Chronicle
Chronicle
Chronicle