Subscribe to the
Drug War Chronicle Newsletter!
Show your support
with a single click
Already have a FastAction account? Log in
By clicking "Log in," I confirm that I agree with the FastAction terms of service and privacy policy.
Show your support
with a single click
Don't have a FastAction account yet? Sign up
By clicking "Sign up," I confirm that I agree with the FastAction terms of service and privacy policy.
Show your support
with a single click
Already have a FastAction account? Log in
By clicking "Log in," I confirm that I agree with the FastAction terms of service and privacy policy.
Show your support
with a single click
Don't have a FastAction account yet? Sign up
By clicking "Sign up," I confirm that I agree with the FastAction terms of service and privacy policy.
Comments
And they often refer to the
And they often refer to the drug users as "scumbags." These snitches are the bottom of the barrell...
Rats
The "Concerned Citizen" that ratted me was saving his ass from Grand Larson as well as other charges. (I was growing a plant.) He ratted others as well. Much of what he said was made up or exaggerated. That just don't matter anymore. Must be hard to live while watching your back all the time. It's a dirty game that smacks of Nazi tactics.
www.pissedoffpothead.com
snitchs
it never ceaces to amaze me what some of these people will do to frame others for there misdeeds and try to put basicly law abiding citizens behind bars to save there own sorry asses
scumbags saving their sorry asses, indeed
What never ceases to amaze me is that so many people blame only the snitch -- it's the cops who encourage the sorry scumbags; threatening them and twisting their words; it's the cops who listen to gossip, because that's the only way to enforce laws against victimless activities.
I'm in no way excusing snitches; what's worse, though, a scumbag lying to save his/her own skin or a law enforcement officer lying to further his/her own career?
In reply to scumbags saving their sorry asses, indeed by rita (not verified)
DEA
The DEA perpetuates reefer madness lies because it is job secuity for them. They like to threaten the scumbags because it is an easy meal ticket for them. They don't care if informants that committed real crimes get off easy, as long as they can keep their fat asses in their useless "jobs".
www.pissedoffpothead.com
it just occurred to me
In my case, through three drug raids, 4 years on probation, one illegal probation search, 6 months in jail and a year in treatment, the original informant is the ONE person who told the truth -- she did, indeed, see me in possession of a useable, saleable amount of meth on the weekend in question.
Not that I don't hope she rots in hell, but save the hottest parts for the sorry-assed cops, lawyers, judges, probation officers and counselors who have no integrity.
snitches &c
Oh those "confidential sources" . We 've had our own trials and tribulations.Thankfully we had a judge honest and courageous (hyperbole perhaps,but it sure felt that way) enough to see the search warrant was bogus.We thought it was a little fishy when local dope fiends I hadn't spoken to in years started showing up at our door to see if we could "help (them) out" And then, of course, our trash went missing. But sure, as "scummy" as it is to snitch I can't help but agree that it's the cops that are creating the problem. Get someone desparate and scared enough, swing all kinds of crazy time in front of them, (women are especially easy 'cause you just threaten to call Child Services) And they'll serve up their Grandma.
Add new comment