Skip to main content

Washington DAs Begin Dropping Marijuana Possession Cases

Submitted by Phillip Smith on (Issue #759)

Some Washington state prosecutors have begun dismissing pending marijuana possession cases in the wake of last week's vote to legalize marijuana in the state. King County (Seattle) prosecutors have dismissed 175 cases involving adults 21 or over, while Pierce County (Tacoma) prosecutors have dropped about 50 more.On Tuesday, Clark County (Vancouver) prosecutors announced they, too, were dropping possession cases.

King County Prosecuting Attorney Dan Satterberg is no longer prosecuting small-time marijuana possession cases. (kingcounty.gov)
I-502 makes the possession of up to an ounce legal under state law and directs the state to come up with a system of state-owned marijuana stores. The possession provision doesn't come into effect until December 6, but some prosecutors have decided to apply the new law retroactively.

"Although the effective date of I-502 is not until December 6, there is no point in continuing to seek criminal penalties for conduct that will be legal next month," King County Prosecuting Attorney Dan Satterberg said in a statement last Friday.

Satterberg has jurisdiction over unincorporated King County, as well as cases on state highways and at the University of Washington. In Seattle itself, which has had a lowest law enforcement priority police in place for nearly a decade, City Attorney Pete Holmes has had a policy of refusing to prosecute simple possession cases.

Satterberg had 40 cases in which criminal charges had already been filed. Those charges will be dismissed. Another 135 cases awaiting charging decisions will be sent back to the arresting police agency.

Pierce County Prosecutor Mark Lindquist told the Seattle Times he was dropping "about four dozen" cases where pot possession was the only offense. "The people have spoken through this initiative," said Lindquist. "And as a practical matter, I don't think you could sell a simple marijuana case to a jury after this initiative passed."

In an interview with the Times, Satterberg said his office would continue to prosecute marijuana possession above one ounce, but would have "a buffer for those whose scales are less than accurate." His office will also charge felony possession for people holding more than 40 grams, but Satterberg said his office routinely allows such defendants to plead down to a misdemeanor.

More than 241,000 people have been arrested for small-time pot possession in Washington in the past 25 years, including more than 67,000 in the last five years. That will end as of December 6, but at least some Washington prosecutors aren't waiting.

Permission to Reprint: This content is licensed under a modified Creative Commons Attribution license. Content of a purely educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of DRCNet Foundation, unless otherwise noted.

Comments

RJ42 (not verified)

The conduct of the individuals in the Washington legal system is like a dream come true. Common sense and kindness are respectable especially in law and make the rest of us in the country Jealous.

Sun, 11/11/2012 - 6:02pm Permalink
sicntired (not verified)

Inthefrozennorth,wherethespacebarisanonentity,westillhavethebestweedandascreweduplegalsystem.OfcoursewecouldntlegalisebecauseofUSpressure.NotthattheObamadrugzealotswillabidebythisdecision.Iexpecttoseefederalinterferenceassoonastheyfigureouttheirfascistprogrom.ObamawillbetheworstantidrugPresidentin40years.

Mon, 11/12/2012 - 7:47am Permalink
Anonymous4567 (not verified)

Folks, let us no longer grovel at the feet of our government leaders for marijuana legalization, since that has proven completely useless.  A government's function is not to liberalize conduct - but only to tighten it.  The only way to legalize marijuana is to put the issue to a vote by ballot initiative!  Then we can begin to topple marijuana prohibition one state at a time.  Congrats to CO and WA for starting the domino effect.

Mon, 11/12/2012 - 10:16am Permalink
Ron Hinchley (not verified)

What will become evident from this is the horrible cost to the 850,000 arrestees (2010) and how the legal remedy is orders of magnitude worse then the crime. Personally I would like it to be eligible for confiscation but I swing toward legalization when I consider the total harm being done using the law. 

Mon, 11/12/2012 - 4:16pm Permalink

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.