Skip to main content

Washington State Makes Drug Possession a Gross Misdemeanor [FEATURE]

Submitted by Phillip Smith on (Issue #1188)
Consequences of Prohibition

Washington state is bordered on the north by British Columbia, which has decriminalized drug possession (at least for the next five years) under a federal waiver in January, and on the south by Oregon, which decriminalized drug possession by popular vote in 2020. But Washington state lawmakers this week made it clear that they would not be following their neighbors down the decriminalization path.

There has been an opening for drug decriminalization in the Washington ever since the state Supreme Court threw out the state's felony drug possession statute in 2021 in Washington v. Blake because it did not require the defendant to knowingly possess forbidden drugs. Rather than have no drug possession statute at all, the legislature that year produced a bill to make it a misdemeanor. That bill was set to expire on July 1.

This year, as the clocked ticked down, lawmakers debated a variety of possibilities from decriminalization to re-felonization, and at the session, a conference committee produced a version of the drug possession law, Senate Bill 5536, that called for making possession a gross misdemeanor (punishable by up to 364 days in jail, as opposed to 90 for a misdemeanor) and skimped on funding for treatment. No Republicans voted for the final version of the bill, saying it was soft on crime.

Democrats and progressives were angered by the imposition of the gross misdemeanor penalties and the levels of treatment funding. Enough disaffected Democrats voted no to kill it.

"The notion that this bill is soft on crime is ridiculous. The House caved to pressure to escalate the penalty back up from a misdemeanor to a gross misdemeanor, with diversions allowed only with the consent of the prosecutor," said Allison Holcomb, director of political strategies for the ACLU of Washington. "A gross misdemeanor carrying a penalty of up to 364 days and a $5,000 fine is harsher than the felony penalty that applied before the Blake decision. The standard range for a felony [drug possession] offense was 0-60 days for the first three offenses, lower even than a misdemeanor -- 90 days."

The session ended last month without a new drug law and that left open the possibility that the state would soon have no drug possession law at all. Gov. Jay Inslee (D) then called a special session to meet this week with the drug possession law as its sole agenda item.

On Tuesday, the legislature passed a revised version of SB 5536, and Gov. Inslee signed it into law that night.

The bill signed into law maintains drug possession as a gross misdemeanor, but limits jail terms to 180 days -- not the 364-day term typical for that level offense. And it creates a new offense of public drug use with the same penalties. For both offenses, the maximum fine was lowered to $1,000.

It also includes $44 million to expand treatment and recovery efforts, more than double the $20 million allocated in the original bill.

But to appeal to conservatives, it also allows localities to continue to prohibit harm reduction services, including needle exchanges and safe injection sites, and it continues to give courts and prosecutors some discretion in a new pretrial diversion program, including jailing defendants who repeatedly reject drug treatment.

"This bill is not designed to fill our jails, it's designed to fill our treatment centers," said Inslee as he signed the bill. "And the investments we're making will create treatment resources in small townships and big cities. This is a statewide solution to a statewide problem."

Some progressives who voted for the bill still had concerns. State Sen. Yasmin Trudeau (D-Tacoma) said the state was still relying on the criminal justice system to bully people into treatment that too often isn't there.

"We don't have the infrastructure to offer services to everyone who will need it, and that gives me great pause," Trudeau said.

But veteran drug reformer state Rep. Roger Goodman (D-Kirkland) called it "a fair compromise that addresses urgent concerns about public disorder but follows evidence-based practices in helping people in need."

Permission to Reprint: This content is licensed under a modified Creative Commons Attribution license. Content of a purely educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of DRCNet Foundation, unless otherwise noted.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.