Some Washington state prosecutors have begun dismissing pending marijuana possession cases in the wake of last week's vote to legalize marijuana in the state. King County (Seattle) prosecutors have dismissed 175 cases involving adults 21 or over, while Pierce County (Tacoma) prosecutors have dropped about 50 more.On Tuesday, Clark County (Vancouver) prosecutors announced they, too, were dropping possession cases.
King County Prosecuting Attorney Dan Satterberg is no longer prosecuting small-time marijuana possession cases. (kingcounty.gov)
"Although the effective date of I-502 is not until December 6, there is no point in continuing to seek criminal penalties for conduct that will be legal next month," King County Prosecuting Attorney Dan Satterberg said in a statement last Friday.
Satterberg has jurisdiction over unincorporated King County, as well as cases on state highways and at the University of Washington. In Seattle itself, which has had a lowest law enforcement priority police in place for nearly a decade, City Attorney Pete Holmes has had a policy of refusing to prosecute simple possession cases.
Satterberg had 40 cases in which criminal charges had already been filed. Those charges will be dismissed. Another 135 cases awaiting charging decisions will be sent back to the arresting police agency.
Pierce County Prosecutor Mark Lindquist told the Seattle Times he was dropping "about four dozen" cases where pot possession was the only offense. "The people have spoken through this initiative," said Lindquist. "And as a practical matter, I don't think you could sell a simple marijuana case to a jury after this initiative passed."
In an interview with the Times, Satterberg said his office would continue to prosecute marijuana possession above one ounce, but would have "a buffer for those whose scales are less than accurate." His office will also charge felony possession for people holding more than 40 grams, but Satterberg said his office routinely allows such defendants to plead down to a misdemeanor.
More than 241,000 people have been arrested for small-time pot possession in Washington in the past 25 years, including more than 67,000 in the last five years. That will end as of December 6, but at least some Washington prosecutors aren't waiting.
The conduct of the
The conduct of the individuals in the Washington legal system is like a dream come true. Common sense and kindness are respectable especially in law and make the rest of us in the country Jealous.
Uphere
Inthefrozennorth,wherethespacebarisanonentity,westillhavethebestweedandascreweduplegalsystem.OfcoursewecouldntlegalisebecauseofUSpressure.NotthattheObamadrugzealotswillabidebythisdecision.Iexpecttoseefederalinterferenceassoonastheyfigureouttheirfascistprogrom.ObamawillbetheworstantidrugPresidentin40years.
Folks, let us no longer
Folks, let us no longer grovel at the feet of our government leaders for marijuana legalization, since that has proven completely useless. A government's function is not to liberalize conduct - but only to tighten it. The only way to legalize marijuana is to put the issue to a vote by ballot initiative! Then we can begin to topple marijuana prohibition one state at a time. Congrats to CO and WA for starting the domino effect.
Kindly follow the link to a
Kindly follow the link to a scientific paper that determines empirically the homicide offense rate to changes in the percentage of arrests attributed to drug offenses. The empirical results obtained are consistent with a priori expectations that homicide offense rates are higher in communities that devote a greater percentage of their policing resources to the enforcement of drug laws.
http://www.cato.org/pubs/journal/cj14n3/cj14n3-8.pdf
The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada recently reviewed 15 studies that evaluated the association between violence and drug law enforcement. "Our findings suggest that increasing drug law enforcement is unlikely to reduce drug market violence. Instead, the existing evidence base suggests that gun violence and high homicide rates may be an inevitable consequence of drug prohibition and that disrupting drug markets can paradoxically increase violence."
http://tinyurl.com/c4uyecn
Here is Julien Codman's testimony, who was a member of the Massachusetts bar, given before the Senate Hearings of 1926:.
"we will produce additional evidence on this point, that it is not appropriate legislation to enforce the eighteenth amendment; that it has done incredible harm instead of good; that as a temperance measure it has been a pitiable failure; that it has failed to prevent drinking; that it has failed to decrease crime; that, as a matter of fact, it has increased both; that it has promoted bootlegging and smuggling to an extent never known before"
"We believe that the time has come for definite action, but it is impossible to lay before Congress any one bill which, while clearly within the provisions of the Constitution, will be a panacea for the evils that the Volstead Act has caused. We must not be vain enough to believe, as the prohibitionists do, that the age-old question of the regulation of alcohol can be settled forever by the passage of a single law. With the experience of the Volstead law as a warning, it behooves us to proceed with caution, one step at a time, to climb out of the legislative well into which we have been pushed."
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/HISTORY/e1920/senj1926/codman.htm
dropping pot cases ahead of law
What will become evident from this is the horrible cost to the 850,000 arrestees (2010) and how the legal remedy is orders of magnitude worse then the crime. Personally I would like it to be eligible for confiscation but I swing toward legalization when I consider the total harm being done using the law.
Post new comment