Feature: San Diego Politicos and Activists Face Off Over Medical Marijuana 1/27/06

Drug War Chronicle, recent top items


recent blog posts "In the Trenches" activist feed



The San Diego County Board of Supervisors has never liked California's medical marijuana law, and last Friday, rather than implement an ID card and registration program as required by the law, it made good on its threat to file a federal lawsuit seeking to overturn it. Reaction was swift, as major drug reform and civil liberties groups and patients fought back on two fronts in a battle the Board may end up regretting having started.

demonstration honoring Steve McWilliams, medical marijuana
provider who took his own life while facing federal prosecution
On the legal front, the Drug Policy Alliance (DPA), the American Civil Liberties Union's Drug Law Reform Project, and the California-based patient defense group Americans for Safe Access (ASA) Tuesday filed a motion to intervene in the lawsuit, a move designed to ensure that the rights of patients are represented in the proceedings. On the political front, ASA, the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP) and local medical marijuana patients and supporters vowed to move forward with a term limits initiative aimed squarely at the long-sitting supervisors.

The board that decided last week to try to overturn the law is the exact same group of elected officials who called Proposition 215 "bad law" when it was passed by California voters in 1996. Now, while supervisors led by Chairman Bill Horn claim they only want to clarify contradictions between state and federal law, their lawsuit, if successful, would effectively kill the Compassionate Use Act.

"We opposed Prop. 215 when it came up; that isn't the point," Horn said. "The issue is, the state's asking the county to do something here that they know darn well is illegal... don't ask us to break federal law."

The county's legal argument is that the medical marijuana law violates both the 1961 United Nations Single Convention on Narcotics and the federal Controlled Substances Act. County Attorney John Sansone argues in the suit that the US Constitution's "Supremacy Clause" (Article Six) means California's medical marijuana cannot stand because it is in contradiction to federal drug laws.

But attorneys opposing the lawsuit point out that claims that federal drug law or the UN convention prevents a state from allowing the medicinal use of marijuana are so weak that Justice Department lawyers refused to raise them back when they challenged the California law in 1996. But before matters even get that far, the groups argue that the county has no standing to sue the state in federal court and that the lawsuit will be soon be dismissed.

"We are very confident this will be thrown out of federal court," said ASA executive director Steph Sherer. "We believe the county has no jurisdiction to file the lawsuit. It's just a waste of everyone's time. I expect this will be over and done with within 90 days. We expect Attorney General Lockyer to file a motion to dismiss -- he has two weeks from now -- and we're confident he will do everything he can to protect the state law, but just in case we are intervening to ensure the rights of patients are addressed."

"We're going to defend state law," Lockyer spokesman Nathan Barankin assured DRCNet Thursday. "We have until February 9 to file our answer to the lawsuit. While we're not going to say too much about what we're going to say in court, I will say there is a real serious question about whether San Diego has standing to file suit in the first place."

Still, the intervenors aren't taking any chances. "The stakes are too high for medical marijuana patients to depend on Gov. Schwarzenegger and the Department of Health Services to defend their interests in court," said Allen Hopper, senior staff attorney with the ACLU Drug Law Reform Project. "These patients and their doctors need to know that someone is looking out exclusively for their interests."

Among those on whose behalf the motion to intervene has been filed are Wendy Christakes, 29, a San Diego resident who uses medical marijuana to treat chronic pain from herniated discs and back surgery; Pamela Sakuda, 58, a rectal cancer patient; and her husband and primary caregiver Norbert Litzinger. In a sign of the statewide implications of the county's lawsuit, also signing on to the motion were Valerie Corral of the Wo/Men's Alliance for Medical Marijuana (WAMM), which was raided by the DEA in 2002 and Dr. Stephen O'Brien, an Oakland physician who specializes in HIV/AIDS treatment and believes many of his patients benefit from the medical use of marijuana.

"Medical marijuana patients are running out of time," said Christakes. "While the supervisors play politics and waste our money on frivolous lawsuits, we have to find a way to survive."

Some activists went as far as welcoming the lawsuit. "Good. They're going to lose," said California NORML head Dale Gieringer. "It's about time we had a federal court decision that went our way. It is a stupid, losing battle those supervisors got themselves into, and I'm glad to see that the ACLU, ASA, and DPA have jumped in to intervene. I would be shocked if the supervisors prevailed," he told DRCNet.

"The board is out there by themselves, and they know it," said Margaret Dooley of DPA's Southern California office. "They think this is their kingdom, but this is going to waste a lot of time and money and people will be hurting. Their decision to continue with the suit shows blatant disregard for the law and the will of their constituents," she told DRCNet.

And some of those constituents are vowing to take political revenge on the board by getting it removed from office via the term limits initiative. Last week, medical marijuana patient Rudy Reyes, backed by MPP and ASA, filed a letter of intent to get the initiative rolling, saying the supervisors had "lost touch with constituents." At Tuesday's board meeting, activists offered to drop the initiative if the board would drop the lawsuit, to no avail.

"We gave them one last chance to withdraw their lawsuit at the board meeting, and they refused to do so, said ASA's Sherer. "We told them we wouldn't start gathering signatures if they dropped it, but now we will run the term limits initiative. And we'll keep going even if the case gets kicked out of federal court. We have to let elected officials know there is a downside to going after medical marijuana patients. If the initiative is successful, it will be provable retribution for opposing medical marijuana."

-- END --
Link to Drug War Facts
Please make a generous donation to support Drug War Chronicle in 2007!          

PERMISSION to reprint or redistribute any or all of the contents of Drug War Chronicle (formerly The Week Online with DRCNet is hereby granted. We ask that any use of these materials include proper credit and, where appropriate, a link to one or more of our web sites. If your publication customarily pays for publication, DRCNet requests checks payable to the organization. If your publication does not pay for materials, you are free to use the materials gratis. In all cases, we request notification for our records, including physical copies where material has appeared in print. Contact: StoptheDrugWar.org: the Drug Reform Coordination Network, P.O. Box 18402, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 293-8340 (voice), (202) 293-8344 (fax), e-mail [email protected]. Thank you.

Articles of a purely educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of the DRCNet Foundation, unless otherwise noted.

Issue #420 -- 1/27/06

Drug War Chronicle, recent top items


recent blog posts "In the Trenches" activist feed


Feature: San Diego Politicos and Activists Face Off Over Medical Marijuana | Feature: Study Claiming Methamphetamine is Overrunning Hospital Emergency Rooms Fails to Withstand Scrutiny | Feature: Medical Marijuana Refugee Steve Kubby Expelled From Canada, Faces Life Threatening Jail Sentence in California | Feature: On the Occasion of our 420th Issue, We Look at 4:20 | Law Enforcement: This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories | Europe: Ireland to Start "Cautioning" Marijuana Users -- No, Wait a Minute, We Changed Our Mind | Europe: British to Review Drug Classification Scheme | South Asia: Indian Farmers, Maoists Team Up in Opium Trade | Australia: Green Party Takes a Step Back on Drug Policy | Electoral Politics: Nationally Known Drug Reformer Seeks Green Party Gubernatorial Nomination in Connecticut | Medical Marijuana: New Mexico Bill Wins Senate Committee Approval | Weekly: This Week in History | Job Opportunities, MPP in DC and Nevada | Weekly: The Reformer's Calendar

Mail this article to a friend
Send us feedback on this article
This issue -- main page
This issue -- single-file printer version
Drug War Chronicle -- main page
Chronicle archives
Subscribe now!
Out from the Shadows HEA Drug Provision Drug War Chronicle Perry Fund DRCNet en EspaŮol Speakeasy Blogs About Us Home
Why Legalization? NJ Racial Profiling Archive Subscribe Donate DRCNet em PortuguÍs Latest News Drug Library Search
special friends links: SSDP - Flex Your Rights - IAL - Drug War Facts

StoptheDrugWar.org: the Drug Reform Coordination Network (DRCNet)
1623 Connecticut Ave., NW, 3rd Floor, Washington DC 20009 Phone (202) 293-8340 Fax (202) 293-8344 [email protected]