Editorial: DEA Has Stepped In It This Time 2/4/05

Drug War Chronicle, recent top items

more...

recent blog posts "In the Trenches" activist feed

SUBSCRIBE TODAY!!!


http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/373/steppedinit.shtml

David Borden, Executive Director, [email protected], 2/4/05

David Borden
The DEA has "stepped in it," this time, as they say. We've noted previously how the abrupt withdrawal by the agency of its Frequently Asked Questions document on pain control -- crafted over a two-year period by DEA and a wide range of pain treatment authorities and medical organizations -- has prompted unprecedented criticisms by their former partners. Organized medicine is waking, if still groggy, to the reality that drug enforcement in the US is an unreliable partner whose actions have worked to the detriment of pain control, not the benefit.

Criticism has now come from within law enforcement as well. Late last month, a letter from the National Association of Attorneys General, a group representing the states' top law enforcement officials -- signed by 30 of them, more than half -- took the DEA to task. Addressed to DEA chief Karen Tandy, the 30 state attorneys general on the letter expressed "surprise" at DEA's withdrawal of the FAQ, and concern that this action would have a chilling effect on the treatment of pain. And they asked Tandy for a meeting next month when they will all be in town for the annual state attorneys general conference.

When a majority of state attorneys general want to meet the head of the DEA in person to tell her she's wrong, it's big. If Tandy didn't already realize she'd screwed up, she probably does now. I have long considered the DEA a rogue agency that should be abolished and not mourned, but frankly even I was shocked they would do something like this. Even worse, some observers believe DEA pulled the FAQ to gain an advantage in their successful attempt to convict Virginia pain doctor William Hurwitz.

I shouldn't have been shocked -- I knew better. The unfortunate reality is that morality and ethics in the criminal justice have been terribly degraded -- in significant part by the war on drugs, as police leaders like former San Jose police chief Joseph McNamara have discussed -- so inappropriate prosecutorial interventions and "out of control" agency actions like the FAQ's abrupt withdrawal are not surprising but should be expected. One of the unethical aspects of the pain wars is that civil matters such as accusations of substandard doctoring are now being treated as criminal matters and hence game for criminal prosecutors. That is not what the law says should happen.

But no one has stepped up to the plate to stop them -- not even the AGs who signed this letter. California's Bill Lockyer, for example, allowed prosecutors working under his authority to continue their persecution of Frank Fisher, another pain doctor, even though the charges against him were as spurious as could be -- even the malpractice claims against Fisher have now been withdrawn. Perhaps this letter will be a first step toward more responsible oversight of their minions on the AGs' part. Time will tell.

I hope the FAQ is restored and that doctors will then be more willing to prescribe pain medication in adequate quantities to the patients who need it. I fear that nothing short of the removal of law enforcement from regulation of medicine, excepting perhaps only the most serious and unambiguous circumstances, will suffice to a sufficient degree to serve patients' needs. And I fear that even medical boards comprised of doctors will themselves be a troubled mechanism with regard to pain treatment, as they have tended in the past continuing to the present. At least the medical boards can only strip a doctor's license, and that is less brutal than sending the doctor to prison; and the boards seem more likely to lend weight to what their fellow doctors in pain control have to say. But it may be that only an end to prohibition itself will enable pain control to advance to the level that it can and must attain. Time will tell on these counts as well.

In the meantime, it's good, if unfamiliar, to see state attorneys general take a step like this -- late as it may be and notwithstanding how many more steps are urgently needed. I don't know who made it happen, but if you happen to be reading this editorial, good work, keep it coming. Time will tell where it leads.

-- END --
Link to Drug War Facts
Please make a generous donation to support Drug War Chronicle in 2007!          

PERMISSION to reprint or redistribute any or all of the contents of Drug War Chronicle (formerly The Week Online with DRCNet is hereby granted. We ask that any use of these materials include proper credit and, where appropriate, a link to one or more of our web sites. If your publication customarily pays for publication, DRCNet requests checks payable to the organization. If your publication does not pay for materials, you are free to use the materials gratis. In all cases, we request notification for our records, including physical copies where material has appeared in print. Contact: StoptheDrugWar.org: the Drug Reform Coordination Network, P.O. Box 18402, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 293-8340 (voice), (202) 293-8344 (fax), e-mail [email protected]. Thank you.

Articles of a purely educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of the DRCNet Foundation, unless otherwise noted.

Issue #373 -- 2/4/05

Drug War Chronicle, recent top items

more...

recent blog posts "In the Trenches" activist feed

SUBSCRIBE TODAY!!!

Drug War Chronicle's Phil Smith Featured in New Book -- "Under The Influence" Available as DRCNet Premium | Editorial: DEA Has Stepped In It This Time | "Not Your Father's Marijuana" Canard Again Exposed -- This Time by DEA | Never Say Die: Nevada Marijuana Regulation Initiative is Back After Favorable Federal Court Ruling | DRCNet Interview: Roger Goodman, King County Bar Association Drug Policy Project | Blogging: Mobile, Alabama Police Chief Stuck "Inside the Box" Over City's Rising Drug Trade Violence, and More | Newsbrief: This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories | Newsbrief: DEA Pain FAQ Retract Flap Fallout Continues -- Criticism Comes from Unexpected Direction as Agency Seeks Comments | Newsbrief: HEA Repeal Picking Up Steam -- Congressional Advisory Committee, Arizona Legislators Urge Rescinding of Souder's Law | Newsbrief: DEA Must Pay Hemp Industry Plaintiff's Legal Bills, Court Rules | Newsbrief: Indiana Official Calls for National Agency to Provide Drugs to Addicts | Newsbrief: In Swan Song, Ashcroft Calls for Harsher Sentences, Chastizes Foes | Newsbrief: Man Bites Dog! Arkansas Bill to Lower Meth Sentences Moves Forward | Newsbrief: London Top Cop Warns He Will Target Casual Cocaine Users | Newsbrief: Belgian Cannabis Clarification Now in Effect | Newsbrief: Spanish Pharmacies to Begin Selling Medical Marijuana | Newsbrief: Safe Injection Site Opens in Oslo | Newsbrief: Rastas, Watch Out At Ethiopian Marley Fest, State Department Warns | Newsbrief: India Narcs Set Off Prescription Drug Panic | This Week in History | The Reformer's Calendar |

Mail this article to a friend
Send us feedback on this article
This issue -- main page
This issue -- single-file printer version
Drug War Chronicle -- main page
Chronicle archives
Subscribe now!
Out from the Shadows HEA Drug Provision Drug War Chronicle Perry Fund DRCNet en EspaŮol Speakeasy Blogs About Us Home
Why Legalization? NJ Racial Profiling Archive Subscribe Donate DRCNet em PortuguÍs Latest News Drug Library Search
special friends links: SSDP - Flex Your Rights - IAL - Drug War Facts

StoptheDrugWar.org: the Drug Reform Coordination Network (DRCNet)
1623 Connecticut Ave., NW, 3rd Floor, Washington DC 20009 Phone (202) 293-8340 Fax (202) 293-8344 [email protected]