Newsbrief:
DEA
Pulls
Prescription
Pain
Medicine
FAQs
Without
Explanation
10/8/04
https://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle-old/357/deapain.shtml
In a so-far unexplained move,
the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) Diversion Control Program has
removed a set of frequently asked questions and responses designed to ease
doctors' fears of persecution by the agency for prescribing opioid pain
relievers (https://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle-old/350/guidelines.shtml).
In a quiet notice posted Wednesday, the agency announced that "the document
contained misstatements and has therefore been removed from the DEA web
site."
It is unclear what the DEA
found wrong with the FAQ list. The FAQ, which was released in August,
was a consensus statement produced by experts from the DEA, the University
of Wisconsin Pain and Policy Studies Group, and Last Acts (http://www.lastacts.org),
a national coalition of consumer and professional organizations working
to improve end-of-life care through the use of palliative medicine and
pain management techniques. The document was controversial within
the pain activist community, some advocates from which felt it would further
entrench a system in which law enforcers rather than doctors set medical
standards.
That debate may now be moot.
In its brief, terse statement, the agency said, "DEA wishes to emphasize
that the document was not approved as an official statement of the agency
and did not and does not have the force and effect of law."
Does this mean the DEA thinks
it was too easy on physicians or too harsh? We don't know, but we
will inquire and report next week.
-- END --
Issue #357, 10/8/04
Editorial: A Tragedy in the Capital |
Medical Marijuana Activists Besiege HHS, Demand Rescheduling |
Drug Policy and the Presidential Election -- Introduction |
The Election I: Bush and Kerry on Drugs: Past Records and Platform Planks |
The Election II: Drug Reformers on Kerry and Bush, Nader and Badnarik |
The Election III: DRCNet Interview: Independent Presidential Candidate Ralph Nader |
The Election IV: DRCNet Interview: Michael Badnarik, Libertarian Party Presidential Candidate (repeat) |
Newsbrief: Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Critical Federal Sentencing Cases |
Newsbrief: Needle Exchange Bill Passes New Jersey Assembly |
Newsbrief: Protests Rise over Award as Thai Prime Minister Prepares for New Round of Drug War |
Newsbrief: Bolivia's Chapare Cocaleros Sign Historic Agreement with Government |
Newsbrief: DEA Pulls Prescription Pain Medicine FAQs Without Explanation |
Newsbrief: Hemp Crops in Western Australia Stymied By Licensing Requirements |
Newsbrief: Atlanta Cops Use Forfeited Funds to Buy Bigger Guns |
Newsbrief: No Asset Forfeiture for Misdemeanor Drug Charges, Tennessee Says |
Newsbrief: Texas DA Says Doctors Must Turn In Drug-Using Pregnant Women |
Newsbrief: Another Killer Cop Walks Free |
Newsbrief: This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories |
This Week in History |
Administrative Assistant: Part-Time Job Opportunity at DRCNet |
The Reformer's Calendar
|
This issue -- main page
This issue -- single-file printer version
Drug War Chronicle -- main page
Chronicle archives
|
PERMISSION to reprint or
redistribute any or all of the contents of Drug War Chronicle (formerly The Week Online with DRCNet is hereby
granted. We ask that any use of these materials include proper credit and,
where appropriate, a link to one or more of our web sites. If your
publication customarily pays for publication, DRCNet requests checks
payable to the organization. If your publication does not pay for
materials, you are free to use the materials gratis. In all cases, we
request notification for our records, including physical copies where
material has appeared in print. Contact: StoptheDrugWar.org: the Drug Reform Coordination Network,
P.O. Box 18402, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 293-8340 (voice), (202)
293-8344 (fax), e-mail [email protected]. Thank
you.
Articles of a purely
educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of the DRCNet
Foundation, unless otherwise noted.
|