Skip to main content

Medical Marijuana: New Hampshire Veto Override Falls Two Votes Short

Submitted by Phillip Smith on (Issue #606)
Drug War Issues

Three months after New Hampshire Gov. John Lynch (D) vetoed a medical marijuana bill, bill supporters attempting to override the veto came up one vote short in the state Senate Wednesday. A two-thirds majority was required to override. The override effort had successfully passed the House earlier in the day.

almost but not quite at the New Hampshire Statehouse
The House voted to override the veto by a vote of 240-115, or 67.7% of the vote. But supporters failed to pick up a single vote in the Senate, and that made all the difference. The Senate vote both last summer and this week was 14-10 to override. It would have taken 16 votes to reach a two-thirds majority.

The bill, HB 648, would have established three nonprofit dispensaries to distribute up to two ounces of marijuana every 10 days to patients whose use had been approved by a doctor. Patients could be approved for chronic or terminal conditions that included cachexia, or wasting disorder; chronic pain; or nausea or muscle spasms. They would have had to register with the state to obtain an ID card.

In his veto message earlier this year, Gov. Lynch cited concerns about cultivation and distribution, as well as the opposition of law enforcement. Lawmakers had attempted to address those concerns in conference committee, crafting a tightly-drafted bill, but Lynch was unmoved.

"It's up to 16 of us in this chamber to look at those who are suffering to say, 'I understand and I will help','' said Sen. Peggy Gilmour (D-Hollis). But every senator who voted against the measure earlier this year voted against the override Wednesday.

Pushing for the bill was the New Hampshire Coalition for Common Sense, backed by the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP). "You never give up hope so I'm disappointed," coalition spokesman Matt Simon told the Nashua Telegraph. "Now I'm not looking forward to making those difficult calls to people depending on the legislature to relieve their unrelenting pain."

In fact, Simon and other medical marijuana supporters are looking to inflict a little pain on legislators who voted against them. In a message to supporters after the override failed, MPP pointedly noted that two senators who had voted against the override, Betsi DeVries and Ted Gatsas, are up for reelection in Manchester next week.

Permission to Reprint: This content is licensed under a modified Creative Commons Attribution license. Content of a purely educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of DRCNet Foundation, unless otherwise noted.

Comments

maxwood (not verified)

Properly (#16 mesh) sifted herb furnishes nearly 900-1000 x 25-mg. single tokes per ounce served in a one-hitter. (Let alone using a vaporizer.) What patient could ever need 1800+ tokes in ten days, or 180 a day? Think of all that mind-numbing carbon monoxide.

This sounds suspiciously like an assumption is being made that the herb will be rolled into $igarettes, burned hot (up to 800 degrees C), destroying most THC anyway.

Yes, NIDA issues 900-mg. $igarettes to a few listed patients, a procedural PR gift to the $igarette "industry" which has the veto power (via the $30-bil. it gives the govt. each year in taxes) over said govt.promoting any non-overdose smoking procedure which could leak over from the cannabis users to the slave nicotine $igarette population, destroying Big 2Wackgo's profit margin.

Maybe some reader not afraid of getting shot can fax a version of this argument to some of those NH legislators, I'd rather stay anon just yet.

Fri, 10/30/2009 - 5:53pm Permalink
Anonymous (not verified)

I certainly hope that those two Senators lose their seats in the election next week. It would be nice if enough interested people voted against them since they voted against their constituency. It seems that we need to get more information out to the public, unfortunately we are fighting 70+ years of baloney propoganda from the feds and their supporters.

Sat, 10/31/2009 - 4:16am Permalink

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.