In a prime illustration of the perversities of the war on drugs, US Customs has seized a shipment of a thousand lock boxes aimed at allowing marijuana, tobacco, and pharmaceutical users to keep their stashes safe from kids. Customs has officially designated the boxes as drug paraphernalia, even though everyone involved concedes the boxes are aimed at preventing drug use by kids.
The stash cases were designed by and destined for Stashlogix, a Boulder, Colorado, firm established in the wake of marijuana legalization in the state in 2012 to address a mini-panic over news reports about the dangers of marijuana for kids. Those reports were generally overstated, but the need for secure stashes for pot and other potentially dangerous goodies remained."People didn't have ways to safely store these items out of reach of kids, other than up on shelves or in sock drawers," Stashlogix cofounder Skip Stone told the Washington Post. So he and a partner founded the company to market cases and containers "for the storage and transport of medicine, tobacco, and other stuff."
The company's small, lockable cases, with tiny jars and odor-neutralizing inserts included, were a hit with customers. "People love the product," Stone said. "They use it for all sorts of things, but cannabis is definitely one of them. They keep it locked, they feel safer, they feel more responsible."
So the company geared up production, placing orders with a Chinese factory, but things came to a crashing halt on April 28, when Customs seized 1,000 of the storage cases.
"This is to officially notify you that Customs and Border Protection seized the property described below at Los Angeles International Airport on April 28, 2017," read a letter received by Stashlogix. The agency had seized the bags, valued at $12,000, because "it is unlawful for any person to import drug paraphernalia."
The federal government doesn't officially recognize the legality of medical or recreational marijuana, and Customs is following decades-old drug war paraphernalia laws to achieve a perverse result: Making marijuana potentially riskier in places where it is legal. After all, half of current pot smokers are parents, and this application of federal policy is making it more difficult for them to keep their kids out of their stashes.
Stone is appealing the ruling, but in the meantime, he's had to write off an additional $18,000 worth of goods still outside the country and lay off his three employees. He's looking for a domestic manufacturer for his cases, since Customs can't mess with domestic goods and the DEA hasn't made paraphernalia a high priority, but the ultimate solution lies in Washington.
"It's going to take an act of Congress to clear up some of these contradictions between state and federal law," he told the Post. "These paraphernalia laws are outdated. Keeping kids safe should be more important than outdated regulations."
Comments
insanity
Thats Totally Insane and disgusting that they resort to such a low blow...
Drug Paraphernalia is Illegal in the USA
All you stores and distributors need to look at USC Title 21 Section 863. You are now in cross hairs of Attorney General Sessions. Selling a bong per se is illegal in the USA. All Attorney General Sessions has to do is give the order and all stores, distributors and manufactures can be raided. Your products will be seized and you will be delivered to a Federal Courthouse near you in handcuffs. Ask Tommy Chong if what I am saying is true.
Shame on Stashlogix
"He's looking for a domestic manufacturer for his cases, since Customs can't mess with domestic goods"...Stashlogix just had some instant karma shipped to them by express delivery. That's what you should get in return for outsourcing your production to China with its terrible exploitative labor standards while American workers could fill those jobs. You should have started with Option Two in the first place, then you wouldn't have your shipment seized. Sorry guys, but you had it coming.
In reply to Shame on Stashlogix by Paul McKannon (not verified)
I'm certainly sympathetic to
I'm certainly sympathetic to getting more business for American workers, and of course to improving labor standards around the world. On the other hand, Chinese workers need jobs too. Unless one thinks that anyone who outsources work to China is always wrong and should never ever do it, given the current situation, I don't see why Stashlogix deserves to be shamed for it or why they "had it coming." Also, do you know for a fact that their contractor was a sweatshop-type place? I don't know that it wasn't, but there are some facilities in China that have been certified by organizations or businesses concerned about labor practices. This is a question to ask before slamming someone for doing business in China, in my opinion.
So how about this version instead? "It's a shame that Stashlogix's product was unfairly seized, and even more so if that leads to less protection for parents and others who want to make sure that kids don't get into their supply. But their new plan of making the cases domestically has the upside of also helping to fund jobs here in the US, at a time when the manufacturing sector is hurting. And they won't have to worry whether an overseas contractor has ethical labor practices. Businesses should consider going the domestic production route at the start."
Add new comment