Drug War Issues
Politics & Advocacy
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) said in a statement last Thursday that he intends to hold a hearing seeking information about how the Obama administration plans to respond to the successful marijuana legalization initiatives in Colorado and Washington. Leahy said he expects to hold the hearing when Congress reconvenes early next year.
Leahy also released a letter he sent earlier this month to Gil Kerlikowske, director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP -- the drug czar's office) asking him what recommendations the agency will make to the Justice Department and how, given the fiscal constraints the administration faces, it intends to use federal resources in light of the legalization votes in Colorado and Washington. The veteran Vermont lawmaker also asked Kerlikowske what assurances the administration can give to state officials responsible for the licensing of marijuana retailers to ensure they will face no criminal penalties for carrying out their duties under those state laws.
"The Senate Judiciary Committee has a significant interest in the effect of these developments on federal drug control policy," Leahy wrote. "Legislative options exist to resolve the differences between federal and state law in this area and end the uncertainty that residents of Colorado and Washington now face. In order to give these options full consideration, the committee needs to understand how the administration intends to respond to the decision of the voters in Colorado and Washington. I look forward to hearing your thoughts on this matter."
The Obama administration has yet to formally respond to the legalization votes, but Attorney General Eric Holder said last Wednesday the Justice Department will announce "relatively soon" where it stands on federal enforcement of the pot laws in the two states.
"There is a tension between federal law and these state laws,” Holder said in response to questions after a speech in Boston. "I would expect the policy pronouncement that we’re going to make will be done relatively soon."
A series of public opinion polls this month have found little public support for federal interference with state marijuana laws in states where it is legal, with majorities calling for the feds to keep out of the way. Support for federal non-interference is strongest among key Obama constituencies, including Democrats, independents, and young voters.
Permission to Reprint: This content is licensed under a modified Creative Commons Attribution license. Content of a purely educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of DRCNet Foundation, unless otherwise noted.
Comments
How about a stone cold sober hearing on alcohol vs. marijuana?
that would finish off the war on weed in about 2 seconds.
Federal Law
Federal Law requires uniformity nationwide . Major changes in Federal Law could be around the corner . 2013 .
Remove Marijuana from the CSA
Letting the Federal Government continue to play with the issue of marijuana does nothing but continue the drug war and continue the prohibition of marijuana. Legal regulation by individual States is the best and only way to go.
Tell Congress to remove marijuana from the Controlled Substances Act and get the Federal Government out of the marijuana business entirely. It does not belong there.
Who runs the world?
It is plane to see that the American population has not a clue as to who and why
our drug laws are where they are today. The CIA uses drugs for cash and also
uses drugs to weaken governments. Afghanistan is a prime example! The Taliban
eradicated all drug production. Today it is the leading producer of both marijuana
and heroin, And who guards the fields? Don't take my word for it!
Combat vet uses pot to manage PTSD
pot
Cannabis is a KEY to ALL and every FREEDOM...Let us grow...
Add new comment