This is all just craziness.

Obviously the harms inflicted on the poor for testing positive or false-positive are far greater than the punishment on the powerful.

And although I am no expert, I am aware that the drugs the rich use tend to flush from the body much faster than the  drug which seems to be most favored by the poor, marijuana. So in reality the rich need to be tested every few days.

Finally, I would add that while it may make some reformers happy to see such legislation passed against politicians (I've read many such comments on the net), those reformers are merely pawns of the DrugFree crowd that is destroying the world.

You think people like Calvina Fay, etc… aren't slobbering at the thought of testing everyone alive, politicians too?

This unconstitutional guilty-until-proven-innocent attitude has to stop, as well as the proven wrong idea that people who use drugs only cause problems.

From what I can tell those who have problematic use are obvious and do not need to be tested, and those who consider their use problematic but it's not obvious, will come forward sooner or later, much sooner once we can end this evil shame session that is Prohibition and Drug War.

Please point out the flaws in my logic so I can correct it.

the drug war is about controlling the masses - it has never been about actually being drug free. if it was about being drug free "they" would be against zoloft as much as cannabis. it has never been about protecting us from harmful substances, it is about protecting the pharmaceutical industry's profit margin. "they" wouldn't be trying to control supplements and herbal remedies. same goes for big agra and gmo crops, irradiating and pasturizing the nutrients out of food.

i have often wondered how much of the last decade's financial melt down(s) were fueled by antidepressant use. truncated emotions and an i don't care attitude of the greedy...given that ssris and other mood/behavioral drugs are in the top three drug classes prescribed (behind hormones and allergy drugs)...unfortunately there is probably no way to research this question...

Got to love the fact that they removed the testing for alcohol for the legislators.  Guess they don't want to give up drinking their lunch.  I hope that the judicial branch throws this one out as a violation of the appropriate amendment.

Bunch of idiots in too many of the legislatures around our country.  Going to cost more than it saves them in every state. 

This idea was tried in Florida already. And it showed it lost money doing it.

That 4% failed the drug screen. 2% refused-2% did not pass

If one takes the ave. 300$ amonth welfare, add in 60-100$ drug testing monthly... well, do the math. Ultimately the program is nothing more than another 'Social' program bringing $ from the Fed to private buiss.