The US Supreme Court Monday upheld the search of a Kentucky man's apartment after police broke in without a search warrant because they said they smelled burning marijuana and heard sounds suggesting he was trying to destroy the evidence. The decision in Kentucky v. King overturned a Kentucky Supreme Court ruling in favor of the apartment resident, Hollis King, who was arrested after police entered his apartment and found drugs.
The US Supreme Court -- dismantling the 4th amendment brick by brick
The Kentucky Supreme Court had held that police could not use the exigent circumstances exception because they themselves had created the exigent circumstance by knocking on the door. The US Supreme Court begged to differ.
In his opinion for the 8-1 majority, Justice Samuel Alito wrote that people have no obligation to answer the door when police knock or to allow them to come in if they have opened the door. In such cases, police would have to persuade a judge to issue a search warrant.
But that's not what King and fellow apartment residents did. They started scuttling around suspiciously upon hearing police announce their presence--or at least, police said they did. "Occupants who choose not to stand on their constitutional rights but instead elect to attempt to destroy evidence have only themselves to blame," Alito wrote.
Only Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, arguing that in ruling for the police, the court was giving them a way to get around the search warrant requirement in drug cases. "Police officers may now knock, listen, then break the door down, never mind that they had ample time to obtain a warrant," she wrote.
Oddly enough, King was not the target of police. Lexington police had set up a controlled drug buy on the street outside the apartment building, but when they attempted to arrest the suspect, he fled into the building. When police arrived in the hallway, the suspect had vanished, and all police saw was two apartment doors. When they smelled the odor of pot coming from King's apartment, they chose that door. The original suspect was in the other apartment. They arrested him later.
[Scott Morgan, editor at our Speakeasy blog and associate director of Flex Your Rights, has a piece on Huffington Post discussing the Supreme Court decision. Click here to read it.]
God Save us All
Here are the facts people, You are sitting in the restroom of your master bedroom reading the paper, there is a knock at the front door, you drop the paper, flush and run to see who is there, you are greeted by armed officers, with the right to enter your home..
Congratulations, we have now entered a very very dark place in the history of this country!
Buckets for Everyone
Make toilets illegal, too.
We Are Toast
Separation between Citizens and Government is a major red flag. If no correction, we are on the way out.
Fourth Amendment gone to [email protected]?
So what's next?
There's no privacy left in our country anymore!
No Freedom's!
reply
The process is slow and creeps up on you when it comes to government controlling all aspects of your life... it can get away with - for your safety and everyone elses's of course - not! Orwell's 1984... is becoming a reality.
doublespeak...
the decision does in fact contradict itself at several points...see my post below...
time to form the resistance
Only in America
We have no rights in this country. So shut up pay your taxes and do what they say or else!!
stop censoring my post im not
Supreme Court Creates New Market for Cop-Proof Doors
Having problems with your entryways? Can’t keep the pests out because your doors leak aromas? Do your doors and windows transmit the sound of flushing toilets…?
Technological Counter-Adaptation is the thing to keep in mind when battling an American police state insidiously bequeathed upon us by our lowly supremes and assorted marijuana-phobes.
Fight back with TCA. Soundproof your toilets. Seal and reinforce your doors and windows. Put your government under surveillance. A hidden sound-and/or-video capture system has a long history of being a very effective defense against violators of our civil rights. Depending on specific state laws involving surreptitious recordings of speech, video recording may be the only option. In any event, force your government live up to its own stated ideals of liberty and justice for everyone, because your government certainly doesn't care to do it by themselves.
Remember: only you can prevent police intrusions.
Giordano
a self-contradictory and disingenous ruling...
and it would be quite funny were it not for the grave ramifications...
the decision basically said that you have the right to refuse entry to the police but you dont (since doing so necessarily creates the "exigency")...this decision was obviously very poorly thought out.. and it had to be..since there is simply no logical contortion (not even one the SCOTUS could concoct..and thats their specialty) that could defend such an action...
nor does the SCOTUS need to use convoluted logic anymore.. since this ruling effectively ends the rule of law...
In 2004 they goofed on
In 2004 they goofed on "Medical Marijuana" and "Eminent Domain". Then it was 3-6 and 4-5. Now it's 1-8. Getting worse.
The 4th amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The next logical step?
Here it is:
LEMME see your Papers!
This is some DEEP Shite'
Another basic right gets
Another basic right gets trampled by the very people that we depend upon to protect us from such injustices.
We all might as well go move into glass houses as we certainly no longer have any expectations of privacy.
America is well on its way to becoming a police state, they just need to remove a couple more of those pesky freedoms.
?
America has been a police state for at least 25 years if not longer. They are just, finally, getting around to closing and locking the trap door.
Death of the 4th amendment
You'll notice that Kagan and Sotomayor had no trouble in shredding the Constitution. A vote for Barack Obama is a vote for the end of a free, Constitutional Republic, one with the rule of law and private property rights. By the way, my post that you censored only told the truth. I would think that you'd want the American citizens to know the truth.
Shall hold their office during good behavior.
It's painfully obvious these justices have lost their "good behavior" status. The US constitution say's nothing about "exigent circumstances". The words "I thought" don't make circumstances "exigent". These judges are confusing "constitutional rights" with "law". Just like every other court in this country, the supreme court now has no credibility. If these judges aren't removed immediately it's a crime against the people of these united states. People the US justice system is no better than the Mafia, Al-Qaeda, or the Taliban. In fact evidence shows that our government has been infiltrated by these groups, and now we have a new war.
Sounds Like a Potential Conflict of Interest To Me
Someone needs to check and see if any of the SCOTUS justices own stock in silent-flush toilet manufacturing companies.
Post new comment