Editorial:
Why
I'm
Still
an
Optimist
10/14/05
David Borden, Executive Director, [email protected]
But in any social change effort, there is a lot of work that has to be done, largely before reaching the public's radar screen, to get things to a point where change currents are even noticeable much less dominant. And in my opinion, that work being done at that level is going well. We are making slow but discernible progress in the court of public opinion. If the currents are against us, the undercurrents run in our direction. Things are getting ready to change -- I don't know when or how long it will take them to be ready, but I strongly believe that they will and that things will then more visibly move in the right direction. One of the reasons that 12 years into this I am still an optimist, is that while most people have heard our side get ridiculed, few have actually yet heard what we have to say. The case against prohibition -- or for some form of legalization, depending on how you prefer to express it -- is an overwhelming one. As I wrote in an August 2003 open letter to DC chief judge Rufus G. King (son of our movement's late great Rufus King): Prohibition creates a lucrative black market that soaks our inner cities in violence and disorder, and lures young people into lives of crime. Laws criminalizing syringe possession, and the overall milieu of underground drug use and sales, encourage needle sharing and increase the spread of HIV and Hepatitis C. Our drug war in the Andes fuels a continuing civil war in Colombia, with prohibition-generated illicit drug profits enabling its escalation. Thousands of Americans die from drug overdoses or poisonings by adulterants every year, most of their deaths preventable through the quality-controlled market that would exist if drugs were legal. Physicians' justifiable fear of running afoul of law enforcers causes large numbers of Americans to go un- or under-treated for intractable chronic pain. And frustration over the failure of the drug war, together with the lack of dialogue on prohibition, distorts the policymaking process, leading to ever more intrusive governmental interventions and ever greater dilution of the core American values of freedom, privacy and fairness.In other words, it's a pretty bad scene. And prohibition created it. While a correct understanding of the consequences of drug prohibition can be counterintuitive to some extent, ultimately people can understand this, if they are given the chance. So the first step is to give them that chance. Retired lawman Howard Wooldridge, who recently completed a cross-country horse ride sporting his "Cops Say Legalize Drugs" t-shirts (see next article), reported something that I would have expected to and often do hear: "I'm not sure I agree with you, but you make some sense," was the typical reaction to his message. And Howard also reports observing a "sea change" in this regard from when he started doing this six years ago. Slowly, gradually, we are making our point. Give it a little more time, and more of those people who are "not sure" now will make up their minds -- I predict that within another six years opinion polls will reflect this. Those first conversations that people have, with Howard, with DRCNet readers, from an op-ed, however it happens, serve the purpose of letting them know that this is an actual issue with a well-reasoned and respectable other side. And the rest is history in the making. I will continue to be optimistic so long as there are people out there to educate and advocates out there doing the educating. Though the fruits of our labors may not be clearly seen for some time, nevertheless this is an effective time to do work in this issue. The Berlin Wall of ideas protecting drug prohibition is doomed to fall. Can you see the chinks appearing in it? It's too late to repair them -- the word is getting out.
|