Initiatives
on
the
Move:
Ann
Arbor,
Berkeley,
Oakland,
Montana
Added
to
Upcoming
Marijuana
Reform
Votes
This
November
6/25/04
Four initiatives -- three
local, one statewide -- related to marijuana policy made the news this
week as they moved toward the November ballot.
In Ann Arbor, Michigan, City
Clerk Ron Olson certified that petitioners for a medical marijuana initiative
there had handed in more than the required 7,000 signatures to put the
initiative on the November ballot. While approval of final ballot
language awaits action by the city council next month, the initiative would
amend the city charter to allow people using marijuana for medical purposes
to avoid prosecution.
The initiative was organized
by the Washtenaw Coalition for Compassionate Care (also known as Medical
Marijuana in Ann Arbor, Ypsilanti and Saline), which is loosely aligned
with the Detroit Coalition for Compassionate Care. The Detroit Coalition's
medical marijuana initiative goes to the ballot in August.
Ann Arbor is a notoriously
pot-friendly town. After White Panther radical John Sinclair was
arrested there in 1969 for possession of three joints and sent to prison
for 10 years, the city saw mass demonstrations on his behalf. Within
two years, an Ann Arbor tradition was born: the annual Hash Bash.
And by 1974, the city had voted to decriminalize marijuana possession,
making it punishable by a $5 ticket (later raised to $25). The city
resisted two efforts to undo decrim in the 1980s. And now it is moving
on the medical marijuana frontier.
In Berkeley, California,
the city clerk confirmed Wednesday that an initiative to give medical marijuana
patients access to larger supplies of cannabis has qualified for the November
ballot. Organizers of the Patients Access to Medical Cannabis Act
collected at least the 2,077 signatures needed to qualify for the November
2 ballot, City Clerk Sherry Kelly reported.
The Berkeley City Council
in April turned back a proposal by Councilmember Kriss Worthington to increase
the number of plants allowed from 10 to 72. The council cited concerns
about crime and questions about how much marijuana one plant produces.
Sponsored by the Alliance
of Berkeley Patients, identified by the Oakland Tribune as "a group of
cannabis club operators," the initiative would:
-
Replace the city's 10-plant
medical cannabis limit with a patient's "personal needs," defined by a
doctor and the patient.
-
Set up a peer review committee
to oversee the safety and operations at the four dispensaries.
-
Amend zoning ordinances to allow
for the issuance of use permits to qualified applicants.
-
Call on the city to take over
distribution of medical cannabis if the federal Drug Enforcement Administration
closes the city's four dispensaries.
Next door in Oakland, the OaklandCivil Liberties Alliance (http://www.taxandregulate.org)
reported it had submitted more than 30,000 signatures, 12,000 more than
the 20,000 needed to qualify for the November ballot. The Oakland
Cannabis Initiative would instruct the city to tax and regulate private
adult use as soon as possible under state law. Until state law is
changed, Oakland city officials would be required to lobby the legislature
in favor of changes that would allow for regulated distribution of marijuana
to adults. In the meantime, the initiative would also require city
police and prosecutors to treat the private adult use of cannabis as their
lowest law enforcement priority.
"This law will keep cannabis
off the streets, away from children, and out of the hands of dangerous
drug dealers, by making it available in licensed businesses, not on neighborhood
street corners," said Dale Gieringer, a member of OCLA and the president
of the California Chapter of NORML (http://www.canorml.org).
OCLA expects the signatures
to be verified and the initiative approved within a few weeks, and based
on reactions to the signature gathering campaign, organizers are optimistic.
"We collected signatures in every commercial area from Foothill Square
to Rockridge, and even went door to door in some neighborhoods," said Kim
Swinford, the campaign Field Director. "We found that Oaklanders
are tired of police resources being wasted on adult cannabis use, while
programs are being cut in our parks and libraries."
The Oakland initiative boasts
strong local support, including several elected officials, as well as financial
and technical assistance from the Drug Policy Alliance (http://www.drugpolicy.org)
and the Marijuana Policy Project (http://www.mpp.org).
OCLA reported its campaign would really kick into gear once the initiative
is approved for the ballot.
Last but not least, the Marijuana
Policy Project announced this week that the Montana medical marijuana initiative
it is sponsoring (http://www.montanacares.org)
is headed for the ballot. Organizers turned in more than 32,000 petition
signatures to state government officials, more than enough to qualify.
The Montana initiative would,
in its own words:
-
Allow terminally and seriously
ill patients who find relief from marijuana to use it with their doctors'
approval;
-
Protect these seriously ill
patients from arrest and prosecution for the simple act of taking their
medicine;
-
Permit qualifying patients or
their caregivers to cultivate their own marijuana for their medical use,
with limits on the amount they could possess;
-
Create registry identification
cards, so that law enforcement officials could easily tell who was a registered
patient, and establish penalties for false statements and fraudulent ID
cards;
-
Allow patients and their caregivers
who are arrested to discuss their medical use in court; and
-
Keep commonsense restrictions
on the medical use of marijuana, including prohibitions on public use of
marijuana and driving under the influence of marijuana.
In addition to the initiatives mentioned above, there are "regulation" initiatives already set for the November ballot in Nevada and Alaska, medical marijuana initiatives on the ballot in Arkansas and Oregon, and the city of Columbia, Missouri, Detroit (in August) and possibly Minneapolis, and "lowest priority" initiatives in Columbia, Missouri, and probably Tallahassee, Florida. It looks as if marijuana will once again feature prominently on the political scene this fall.
-- END --
Issue #343, 6/25/04
Editorial: Ruling Creates More Questions Than Answers |
Like a Rock: New York's Rockefeller Drug Laws Survive Another Legislative Session |
When Remaining Silent Is a Crime: US Supreme Court Rules Cops Can Arrest Those Who Refuse to Identify Themselves |
Initiatives on the Move: Ann Arbor, Berkeley, Oakland, Montana Added to Upcoming Marijuana Reform Votes This November |
DRCNet Interview: Jude Renaud, Executive Director, Educators for Sensible Drug Policy |
Newsbrief: Is Cecil Knox the Godfather? Feds Indict Southwest Virginia Pain Specialist Cecil Knox for Third Time, Aim to Win Racketeering Conviction |
Newsbrief: Florida Pain Doctor Found Guilty of Illegal Prescribing |
Newsbrief: California Pharmacist to Go on Trial for Filling Oxycontin Prescriptions |
Newsbrief: Two Rulings Could Affect Federal Sentencing |
Newsbrief: American Bar Association Report Calls for "Smart on Crime" Approach, End to Mandatory Minimum Sentences |
Newsbrief: Utah Supreme Court Upholds Religious Peyote Use by Non-Indians |
Newsbrief: Marijuana Candy Bars Appear in Bay Area |
Newsbrief: This Week's Corrupt Cops Story |
New Jersey Needle Exchange Update |
This Week in History |
Students for Sensible Drug Policy Chapter Grants |
The Reformer's Calendar
|
This issue -- main page
This issue -- single-file printer version
Drug War Chronicle -- main page
Chronicle archives
|
PERMISSION to reprint or
redistribute any or all of the contents of Drug War Chronicle (formerly The Week Online with DRCNet is hereby
granted. We ask that any use of these materials include proper credit and,
where appropriate, a link to one or more of our web sites. If your
publication customarily pays for publication, DRCNet requests checks
payable to the organization. If your publication does not pay for
materials, you are free to use the materials gratis. In all cases, we
request notification for our records, including physical copies where
material has appeared in print. Contact: StoptheDrugWar.org: the Drug Reform Coordination Network,
P.O. Box 18402, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 293-8340 (voice), (202)
293-8344 (fax), e-mail [email protected]. Thank
you.
Articles of a purely
educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of the DRCNet
Foundation, unless otherwise noted.
|