Canadian Supreme Court Postpones Marijuana Cases, Cites Parliament Report, Justice Minister Statement on Decrim 12/20/02

Drug War Chronicle, recent top items


recent blog posts "In the Trenches" activist feed


Canada's highest court backed away from a potentially groundbreaking set of marijuana cases on December 12, the day after the House of Commons committee on drugs issued its report calling for marijuana decriminalization and three days after Justice Minister Martin Cauchon said he would attempt to introduce decriminalization legislation early next year. In three cases set to be heard by the court this week, convicted marijuana smokers were ready to argue that federal marijuana laws are unconstitutional because the drug is relatively harmless. Now that court date is pushed back to the spring session, according to the court, and perhaps for much longer, according to one of the attorneys arguing the case.

While both lawyers for the defendants and the Crown sought to proceed with the hearing, the Supreme Court demurred. Speaking for the court, Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin said it would not make sense to proceed given that Canada's marijuana laws appear to be in flux. "A central question is the Minister of Justice has announced his intention to introduce legislation in the parliament that will decriminalize, in some ways, possession of marijuana," she said. "The underlying basis will be taken up in parliament and widely discussed for months to come. In considering all of these circumstances, the court will adjourn."

"They say we will be back in court in the spring, but I don't know what that means," said a frustrated Alan Young, attorney for defendant Christopher Clay. "There could legislation introduced by then, giving the court a reason to delay again. This doesn't make sense. The court should recognize that we are potentially talking about delaying this case for two years while waiting for legislation to pass."

Many Canadian activists are asking whether Justice Minister Cauchon's announcement in favor of decriminalization last week was designed to stop the court from ruling on the constitutional challenge to marijuana prohibition. "This announcement from the government came out just days before the Supreme Court was going to hear a comprehensive challenge to the cannabis law," said British Columbia Marijuana Party leader Dana Larsen. "The fact that the court decided to postpone the cases, doesn't inspire us with great hope for the court," he told DRCNet. "The timing on this is either extremely coincidental or extremely well-planned. It seems suspicious."

"The timing of Cauchon's announcement is really bizarre," agreed Marc-Boris St.-Maurice of the Canada Marijuana Party. "There is supposed to be a wall between the legislature and the judiciary, but Cauchon even wrote a letter to the Supreme Court on the issue, and the court used that as an excuse to postpone the hearings," he told DRCNet. "We think Cauchon should have to resign for improperly influencing the Supreme Court."

"It seems to me there's an utmost disrespect that was shown for the legal process," Young told DRCNet. "The court feels they've been put in a difficult position. The Minister of Justice should not have done that."

Young also said it was "beyond coincidence" that the government scheduled the release of the parliamentary committee report on decriminalization for the same week as the Supreme Court hearing. "The government is using smoke and mirrors here, people are talking out of both sides of their mouths," said Young. "There has been an effort to derail the Supreme Court challenge. The government may want to act on marijuana, but it doesn't want the court forcing its hand. I think the government wants to see what is going to happen and doesn't want to be hurried by the court."

That may be politically naïve, said Young. "Anyone who understands the politics of drugs should know that a constitutional ruling would not excite as much of a retaliatory American response as a legislative act." But it looks as if the Canadian government wants to do it the hard way.

And the marijuana defendants will be waiting. "I think we'll be back here in the spring session," David Malmo-Levine told the Toronto Globe & Mail. "The government won't have raised a finger, won't have done anything, or else they'll have introduced a horrible bill that will result in many people going to jail for unpaid fines. Either way, we'll be back here with the same complaints."

-- END --
Link to Drug War Facts
Please make a generous donation to support Drug War Chronicle in 2007!          

PERMISSION to reprint or redistribute any or all of the contents of Drug War Chronicle (formerly The Week Online with DRCNet is hereby granted. We ask that any use of these materials include proper credit and, where appropriate, a link to one or more of our web sites. If your publication customarily pays for publication, DRCNet requests checks payable to the organization. If your publication does not pay for materials, you are free to use the materials gratis. In all cases, we request notification for our records, including physical copies where material has appeared in print. Contact: the Drug Reform Coordination Network, P.O. Box 18402, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 293-8340 (voice), (202) 293-8344 (fax), e-mail [email protected]. Thank you.

Articles of a purely educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of the DRCNet Foundation, unless otherwise noted.

Issue #268, 12/20/02 Special Offer Continues -- DRCNet Needs Your Help! | Editorial: Expanding the Chorus | 108 Euro-Parliamentarians Call for Legal, Regulated Drug Trade, Reform of UN Conventions | Congressional Drug Warrior Having Doubts: Dan Burton's Near Epiphany | Michigan Legislature Repeals Mandatory Minimum Drug Laws | Canadian Marijuana Activists Skeptical on Decrim | Canadian Supreme Court Postpones Marijuana Cases, Cites Parliament Report, Justice Minister Statement on Decrim | DRCNet Book Review: "Busted: Stone Cowboys, Narco-Lords, and Washington's War on Drugs" | And the Winners Are | Federal Judge Shows Keen Interest in Raich/Monson Medical Marijuana Case | Bolivia Coca Growers Announce Blockades for January 6 -- Will Continue Dialogue | DC Measure 62 Clears Hurdle, Goes to Congress 268/jeffjones Newsbrief: Oakland Cannabis Co-op Director Founded Guilty on Federal Jury Tampering Charges, Handed Out Flyer at Epis Trial | Newsbrief: This Week's Corrupt Cop Story | Newsbrief: Stop the Presses! Poor, Blacks Face Brunt of Houston Drug War | Newsbrief: Texas ACLU Report Slams Task Forces, Calls for End to $200 Million Annual Boondoogle | Newsbrief: MPP Continues "War on Drug Czar" -- More Complaints to be Filed, O'Reilly Appearance Tonight | Newsbrief: Budget Cuts Free Kentucky Drug Prisoners -- Oklahoma Next? | Newsbrief: Nickelodeon Censors Beverly Hillbillies Marijuana References | Newsbrief: Asset Forfeiture Unconstitutional in New Jersey | Media Scan: Joycelyn Elders in Globe and Mail, George McMahon in Fort Worth Weekly, Jeff and Tracy, Santa Fe New Mexican, Medscape | DC Job Opportunities at DRCNet | Action Alerts: Rave Bill, Medical Marijuana, Higher Education Act Drug Provision, Tulia, Salvia Divinorum | The Reformer's Calendar

This issue -- main page
This issue -- single-file printer version
Drug War Chronicle -- main page
Chronicle archives
Out from the Shadows HEA Drug Provision Drug War Chronicle Perry Fund DRCNet en EspaŮol Speakeasy Blogs About Us Home
Why Legalization? NJ Racial Profiling Archive Subscribe Donate DRCNet em PortuguÍs Latest News Drug Library Search
special friends links: SSDP - Flex Your Rights - IAL - Drug War Facts the Drug Reform Coordination Network (DRCNet)
1623 Connecticut Ave., NW, 3rd Floor, Washington DC 20009 Phone (202) 293-8340 Fax (202) 293-8344 [email protected]