El Paso City Council Threatened With Funding Cuts for Proposing Drug Legalization Debate
Merely discussing alternatives to drug prohibition is enough to incite threats from state and federal legislators:
After hours of discussion and almost 40 speakers from the public signed up to give their two cents, City Council members near-unanimously said they supported the resolution upon which they voted last week, but were swayed by threats from the El Paso legislative delegation and U.S. Rep. Silvestre Reyes.
…
The five Texas House members of the El Paso delegation and Reyes had sent letters to El Paso City Council claiming that the resolution would be used against the city's efforts to secure funding. [Newpapertree.com]
The council finally and reluctantly surrendered, even though all they’d ever done was endorse "an honest, open national debate on ending the prohibition of narcotics." It’s really an incredibly instructive moment in drug policy reform, as I can scarcely recall a moment in which our opponents have appeared so desperate and intimidated by the prospect of discussing changes in our drug policy.
They’ve attacked not only the legalization viewpoint, but our right to be heard. They’ve condemned the fundamental notion that there is a conversation to be had about whether our policies are working. And they’ve done so with righteous hostility, directly threatening to withhold funding from an entire city (from children?) in order to prevent our drug laws from facing scrutiny.
Really, you’ve got to wonder about the health of an idea that can only be defended through threats and distractions such as these. Drug prohibition has had plenty of time to prove itself. Having failed to do so, the drug war’s survival now depends on the ability of its adherents to silence criticism and obstruct dialogue preemptively. It’s an ugly thing to behold.
But let me be perfectly clear about this: I don’t believe for one second that this week’s events in El Paso are indicative of any barrier or threshold that we cannot cross. If our opponents think today’s council vote is a victory for drug prohibition, they are out of their minds. They look like idiots. This whole resolution was nothing before the mayor vetoed it, triggering a weeklong exhibit in the mindblowing intellectual cowardice that underscores opposition to reform at every turn.
Telling us to shut up isn’t going to work, I promise.
Continued Exposure
Comment posted by Anonymous on Wed, 01/14/2009 - 10:19am"We are winning."
Agreed, though that is contingent upon proper exposure to what should be an outraged public understanding that open debate is a critical part of an open and free society.
Marijuana, Inc.
Comment posted by cvmg1969 on Wed, 01/14/2009 - 6:53pm"Marijuana, Inc." a one hour documentary will be aired on CNBC this month. It will be January 22nd and 25th, at 9:00 AM and 1:00 AM (EST). Meanwhile, it would be nice for all the marijuana friends getting this to go to the You Tube video and leave a positive comment on this subject, which you can do by going to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUQOQyNx-rU – that is of course – if you have something positive to say.
Send this to everyone on your email list for them to add their positive comments on this subject also.
Obama & U.S. Rep. Silvestre Reyes.
Comment posted by Anonymous on Wed, 01/14/2009 - 9:03amObama & U.S. Rep. Silvestre Reyes have something in common. They don't want a discussion. Well, the prohibitionists just showed how concerned they are that they ignore, then coerce. The drugs wars are forcing the issue and so are we. We're going to win because to allow the failure called prohibition to continue will be the ruination of us all. Rep. Silvestre Reyes, your name will go down in history as a roadblock to peace. But, you will not deter drug reform.
"efforts to secure funding"...
Comment posted by Anonymous on Wed, 01/14/2009 - 12:24pm...for what, exactly? More drug war, no doubt. Sounds like governmental ,organized blackmail to me. Afterall ,Texas is the official pri$on $tate. But ,at least the cow has left the barn.
Truth in on our side,,, but that means nothing to $ystem of lies
Comment posted by Anonymous on Wed, 01/14/2009 - 2:17pmOf course they don't want to talk about it. An honest discussion would prove the drug war a failure and expose the lies. Regardless of what reformers might want to believe, there is more money in prohibition than legal marijuana for instance. This is what they are trying to protect. Obama must know that legalizing marijuana would be worse for the ecomomy than the money generated and sustained by the industrial prison complex, courts, law enforcement, testing labs/supplies, lawyers, etc. The drug war has evolved into BIG BUSINESS. Much bigger than alcohol prohibition from the past.
Reform will never come by showing that marijuana is safer. It won't come by showing the green economy potential of hemp. Reform will never happen because of the tax potential of legal marijuana. To me, the only way reform will come will be to show human rights violations against drug users. The convicted drug user is that same as the Jew in the Nazi holocost. It must be expose that convicted drug users are providing a legal form of slavery (prison labor) today. It must be common knowledge that drug users are taking abuse (losing their property, losing their families, losing their freedoms) soley for PROFIT. To me, all other angles are a waste of time.
john
Comment posted by Anonymous on Thu, 01/15/2009 - 10:43amThis was actually the perfect end to this situation. Even if the council had voted to override the veto, nothing would have actually happened. No one would have discussed legalization as the resolution asks. But, by threating to cut funding and scaring the council into upholding the veto, the public once again sees the ridiculous tactics employed by the prohibitionists to continue their pointless war on drugs. Everyone must tow the party line when it comes to the war on drugs, we can have no dissent, no discussion, no opposition. We must all band together and chant drugs are bad, drugs are bad, drugs are bad, repeat, don't think, drugs are bad, etc.
Prohibition breeds corruption
Comment posted by Anonymous on Sat, 01/17/2009 - 4:58pmJust as with the alcohol prohibition. Prohibition breeds corruption among criminals, politicians and the justis dept, it's just open black mail.










digg
reddit




Against Honesty
Comment posted by Anonymous on Wed, 01/14/2009 - 1:59amDamn right it's not going to work. This amounts to nothing more than screaming and covering your ears to drown out an opposing argument. We are winning.