CHANGING MINDS, LAWS & LIVES CAMPAIGN

About DRCNetStop the Drug War (DRCNet) is an international organization working for an end to drug prohibition worldwide and for interim policy reform in US drug laws and criminal justice system. Read more about DRCNet.

Make a Donation

Want to stop the drug war? One way to help is to make a generous donation -- member support makes up a critical portion of our budget, and we can't do it without you!

some organizations DRCNet played a role in starting:


Barbara Kay Says Mean Things About Marijuana Users and the Reform Movement

Barbara Kay's latest column on marijuana policy at The National Post is a remarkable achievement. I've simply never seen an article that endorses marijuana decriminalization while simultaneously serving up such silly anti-pot propaganda.

Kay maintains that she supports decrim, but opposes legalization, urging proponents to "inquire more deeply into recent scientific findings" about marijuana. After encouraging a science-based debate, Kay launches into a series of wildly unscientific generalizations:

…because alcohol in moderation is culturally aligned with enhanced fellowship and animated human interaction, it is therefore a communal as well as an individual good. Conversely, the purpose of marijuana is the alteration of consciousness, an end achieved by a process that thrives in solitude and mental torpor.

What!? Rather obviously, the "enhanced fellowship and animated human interaction" achieved through alcohol use is the direct result of the "alteration of consciousness." Kay is literally suggesting that marijuana users seek "alteration of consciousness" while alcohol users do not. That is just not true. What else can I say? People use alcohol and marijuana for the same reason. They like the way it makes them feel.

Equally dishonest is her characterization of marijuana use as a "process that thrives in solitude and mental torpor." To whatever extent marijuana is consumed in more solitary settings than alcohol, mightn't that have something to do with the fact that one is illegal and can get you arrested, while the other is sold openly at bars, concerts, and sporting events? Here in the U.S., public use of marijuana at interracial jazz clubs was one of the reasons the drug became prohibited to begin with.

Whenever one reads such silly arguments, it's only natural to wonder what the author wants. People don't just go around pretending alcohol doesn’t alter consciousness because that's what they believe. No one actually believes that. Right?

In this case, it seems Kay is motivated by animosity towards what she describes as "the nihilist agenda of cynical all-drug legalizers who are exploiting marijuana’s relatively innocent image as their Trojan horse." If that's what she thinks drug policy reform is all about, I guess I shouldn’t be surprised by anything else she says.


Cultural Alignment Indeed

I might believe “alcohol in moderation [as opposed to marijuana] is culturally aligned with enhanced fellowship and animated human interaction,[and] it is therefore a communal as well as an individual good” once I see people pass around a shot glass of tequila the way they pass each other a joint.  Not happening.

Talking out her arse…

Living in Holland, it's quite rare to see someone in a coffeeshop smoking a spliff on their own. Groups of two, three or more passing a joint between them are a common sight though. How does that factor into her argument? Of course it doesn't, because she doesn't concede that liberals have ever been near enough to power to try out their ideas. Hello! Over here! Beside Belgium and Germany (which has a higher rate of drug use than Holland, but never mind that).

But wait, I forgot, the Dutch drug policy is an "unmitigated disaster" and has led to all kinds of societal problems — including social obedience, reduced violent crime/hard drug use and less waste of police time. Silly me. If that was worldwide, shit, we might enter some kind of enlightened age or something, during which we'd spend less money on guns n' such.

"Cheaper, readily available cannabis will escalate consumption and exacerbate well-documented harms in that population." Er… Not true, actually. Only around 10% of Dutchies actually smoke — the majority of cannabis purchasers here are foreigners. And what's this I hear about medical marijuana? Wouldn't that seem to dent the theory that it's bad for you? Plus, decriminalization, by definition, removes criminals from the equation — meaning those dodgy fuckers who'll sell a bit of hash and try get you onto their lovely heroin at the same time will be out of business. How is that a bad thing? Um…

No, better to get boozed up and fight! At least that's socially acceptable.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <i> <blockquote> <p> <address> <pre> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may post code using <code>...</code> (generic) or <?php ... ?> (highlighted PHP) tags.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options