Mitt Romney Recommends Lying to the Kids About Drugs
Mitt Romney thinks it's just awful that Barack Obama has been honest about past experience with alcohol and illegal drugs:
"It's just not a good idea for people running for President of the United States who potentially could be the role model for a lot of people to talk about their personal failings while they were kids because it opens the doorway to other kids thinking, 'well I can do that too and become President of the United States,'" Romney told an Iowa audience today. "I think that was a huge error by Barack Obama…it is just the wrong way for people who want to be the leader of the free world." [FOXNews]
But, um, you can do drugs and become the President. This has been proven time and again as of late and it's actually a terrible idea to suggest otherwise. Young people need to know that they can make mistakes and still be successful. Heck, young people should even know that drug use is often not a mistake if done responsibly at the appropriate age. The problem with convincing them that drug use ruins your future is that they might believe you and just give up.
Really, there is nothing more harmful and destructive than attempting to educate children about drugs by lying about your own experiences. Young people need someone to talk to. They need to know that you understand, and the best way to create that environment is by being honest. If you do understand, don't pretend not to. That's insane.
The truth here is that Barack Obama's experience with drug use is typical. He experimented, aged out of it, and went on to pursue a rewarding career. There's nothing miraculous or shocking about his failure to become a walking after-school special. Most people don't.
But if Barack Obama has been unlucky enough to get arrested, I doubt we'd even know his name. Indeed, drug use won't disqualify you from a high profile career, but the drug war will crush your dreams every time.
If we want to send children the right message about drugs, let's stop threatening to arrest and ruin them for things so many of us did without consequence.
[Thanks, Tom]
(This blog post was published by StoptheDrugWar.org's lobbying arm, the Drug Reform Coordination Network, which also shares the cost of maintaining this web site. DRCNet Foundation takes no positions on candidates for public office, in compliance with section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, and does not pay for reporting that could be interpreted or misinterpreted as doing so.)
reality check
Comment posted by rachelrachel on Sat, 11/24/2007 - 2:57pmReality check: he criticized Obama for telling the truth, which is the same as proposing that Obama lie instead.
No, it isn't the same.
Logically, there are at least three possibilities: lie, tell the truth, or say nothing. Maybe Romney would have liked Obama to say something like, "I'd rather talk about where I want to lead the country in the future than about what I did in the past."
Or it's possible that he meant something else. I don't know.
A journalist could ask a follow-up question to Romney's campaign: "Is Governor Romney recommending that Senator Obama lie about his past?" I don't know that anybody's done that yet.
What Obama said was perfectly appropriate; indeed, I'd like to see politicians speak up like that. And I'm not going to defend what Romney said. But he does come quite a bit short of recommending that Obama lie.
Mormons Only Care About Other Mormons
Comment posted by Giordano on Thu, 11/22/2007 - 4:30amA few more examples of Mormon cultural quirkiness are useful for dispelling the standard Mormon PR that boasts of their honesty and civic mindedness. Not that Mitt Romney has not already accomplished that goal by elevating liars to a kind of sainthood.
A corporate CEO residing in Santa Clarita, CA—a community just north of LA on Hwy 5 heading toward the Grapevine, told me of a Mormon cultural trait he observed after the Northridge earthquake hit his area. The electricity was knocked out in Santa Clarita for three days, and so he made his RV available in a way that turned it into a local civic center for people in the immediate neighborhood who required cooking facilities, electrical communications powered by a generator, etc.
But Santa Clarita is 20-25 percent Mormon. The Mormons in the devastated community had a radically different approach to the Northridge earthquake disaster. They only collaborated with and helped each other—the rest of the community be damned.
What is even more bizarre, is that the CEO is an immigrant who later acquired American citizenship. And here he is reaching out to his community, to strangers, while the almighty “saints” as Mormons call themselves and each other, comprising a religion that was hatched in America 180 years ago, couldn’t lift a finger for their fellow Americans.
Thousands of stories like this one are available from those who have entered the Mormon sphere of influence, but one more may suffice to really drive the point home with regard to the drug war and the potential consequences of a Romney victory.
While staying in a predominately Mormon community, I attended parties that were crashed by Mormon narks. We’d suddenly notice them there, just sitting on the front lawn looking all clean cut with their four-dollar haircuts, (or maybe they would approach us at a public park and ask some stupid cover question while pretending not to look around at our stuff).
With security breached, and our civil rights violated, rather than confront the culprits and create a situation where it might be necessary to grievously injure someone, we dispersed to a new party site without revealing the destination to the junior Mormon spies training for their bright future with the DEA.
The hosts of our decadent gatherings? Jack Mormons—aka Jack Daniels Mormons; or those Mormons who think, drink, smoke, party, and otherwise enjoy life; and who might belong to the LDS Church for social or political reasons, but don’t give a second crap otherwise about church dogma and its restrictions on drug use. Damn, talk about party animals! They could also sense a Mormon nark when they saw one.
Mr. Romney is certainly no Jack Mormon. In reality, a successful presidential run by Mitt Romney would presage a new Dark Ages for America, not because Romney is an evil man, not because he is someone who lacks a conscience; but because he has lived in a cultural bubble all his life, cut off from secular society, and he just doesn’t know any better.
Giordano
Obama
Comment posted by Giordano on Thu, 11/22/2007 - 3:08amAn added note, if Obama had lied about his prior drug use, no doubt someone would have come forward to dispute his claim, which would result in anything but a good example for children, i.e., politicians lie. We don't need anymore Bushisms.
Correction
Comment posted by smorgan on Fri, 11/23/2007 - 5:21pmJohn Edwards supports medical marijuana. His "sends the wrong message" remark was in reference to decriminalizing marijuana for recreational use.
Still ignorant, but not as bad as sacrificing sick people to the DEA.
3 past Republican Presidents who used Cocaine
Comment posted by danos714 on Sun, 11/25/2007 - 2:01amPresident William McKinley had Cocaine Parties in the Whitehouse also US Grant used Cocaine and William Howard Taft used it as well I'm certain our past 2 presidents have used it so Romney is an idiot who knows nothing of American History
3 Republican Presidents who used Cocaine
Parents, Privacy and Democracy
Comment posted by Giordano on Wed, 11/28/2007 - 5:06am“I noticed many drunk parents seriously wondering why their children were having problems with drugs and alcohol, teen pregnancy, DUI’s, etc.”
The severest examples of problem-children are usually those whose parents are the pinnacles of authoritarian perfection. These are the judges’ kids who OD on heroin, cops’ kids who end up in jail for grand theft, and then there are the preachers’ kids who are just too disgusting to talk about.
In a personal rebellion, the pendulum swings equally far from the center when it reaches the other end. And make no mistake, these vile people use drugs in ways that make drugs look really evil.
But aside from those cultures that bind their kids in chains as they struggle to mature and learn; a more common if not more successful home environment involves parents who are moderate in their personal drug habits, knowledgeable and truthful about drugs, and who resist allowing quack organizations such as DARE to educate their kids about drugs.
That’s what it’s come down to, people protecting their kids from defective government sponsored drug education propaganda, while also keeping their kids from awkward encounters with big daddy government that gets little Bobby and Buffy busted and buggered in jail.
“. . . in the past and private”
Agreed.
Privacy is indeed an issue in the drug war. In reference to children, it may be difficult for parents to be discreet when their name is on some government hit list concerning some personal and private act totally irrelevant to the survival of the human species. This and everything about it needs to stop.
“It’s alarming how brutal people can become when they insist on looking at the differences between them and those of other tribes, religions, neighborhoods, etc. Hopefully some day, people will learn to look at the similarities and build upon that rather than the divisive differences.”
Agreed again.
Several drugs, including ecstasy, psilocybin mushrooms, etc., create soft, empathic emotions favoring others, or humanity in general, during the drug session. Psychotherapy research has begun again on some of these drugs after a long hiatus. The bringing together of cultures, as opposed to merely arresting or shooting people, or getting them to shoot each other, may just have a drug solution. It certainly works between individuals.
But, clarifying Mormon culture by going to lds.org? What bias could those guys have? They’re just the Mormon Church, right?
The four-star documentary dealing with modern Mormon culture is by Steven Greenstreet. This Divided State: Death Threats, Bribery, and Family Values…”, (2004). When Greenstreet made the movie, he was a film student at Brigham Young University, so he’s totally impartial in the filming of his fellow Mormons.
The professionally edited DVD depicts the true story of the hilarious efforts to stop film-maker Michael Moore from speaking at Utah Valley State College. Initiated by some local community leaders, red-state/blue-state disputes erupt and rage until the formerly peaceful, idealic, anti-drug community is virtually ripped apart by its own efforts to save itself from the evil Michael Moore.
If the Mormons and the LDS Church should by some odd chance capture the White House in 2008, This Divided State graphically and painfully depicts the Church’s divisive and thoroughly undemocratic vision for America.
Giordano
"Truth...you can't handle the truth..."
Comment posted by Giordano on Wed, 11/28/2007 - 8:05pmI just love that line from Jack Nicholson, don’t you?
So, Lee, you’re a military officer, eh? That figures. I’ve known many military officers, some good, some bad, some really bad. As a member of the military, you realize that you have far fewer civil rights than the average American citizen, including those involving free speech. Kinda sucks, doesn’t it? Or, maybe not.
Who needs free speech when there’s a puppet master ready to yank one’s strings on a whim, some fat cat who tells a person what to do, what to think, how to act—essentially how to conduct one’s life from cradle to grave. Sounds like Easy Street, doesn’t it? It takes real guts to do it any other way.
For a person coddled in this way, someone who never thinks for themselves and has never been allowed to set the social and moral boundaries for their own life, then totalitarianism is only a step away from the situation that already exists in their lives.
It’s no secret to those who study fanatical religious sects and religions that such cultures form the insipient basis for fascist governments. Such was the case in Hitler’s Germany, and such is the case now emerging in America within the judicial industrial complex, complete with its drug war saturated by Mormon narks that continues to be a back door for fascist agendas.
On another front, the U.S. is fighting religious battles in Iraq that should have been concluded by some other country in the sixteenth century, all because of people such as you, Lee.
You may not understand what I or anyone else says here because you, like al Qaeda, live in an imagined world. Religions such as Mormonism and Islam demand abstinence not only from drugs, but from the knowledge that contradicts religious belief (this tends to include just about all relevant knowledge, especially the scientific variety). BTW, speaking of real science, your classmate could not have flipped out merely from ingesting marijuana laced with angel dust; he sounds schizophrenic, and schiz is genetic.
Overall, Mormons and Islamists are rabid anti-intellectuals. They fear drugs (alcohol included) not only because they are told by someone in a recognized position of authority to fear drugs, but because some religious leaders believe drugs can be a mind transformer that can shatter the lies and hypocrisies a person has been fed all their life about religion. Ah, that it could be true, but I don’t think it is. If it were a fact, the military could do an aerial spraying of the Mideast with LSD and we’d all be done with that rotten war.
As for what you think I am or were, you’re dead wrong on all counts. But let me see if I can play that same game in your case. I say you were probably raised in some white trash ghetto in deepest, darkest America. You attended the worst schools in the country, schools that taught you what it was to be a good citizen, but which deliberately neglected to instruct you on the true history of America, the world, and the crazed puppeteers who sometimes run it. This was done to make you more controllable in the future. There were no political discussions in your community, because everyone always agreed on everything. You don’t read books. Your family was not wealthy, so you joined the military (unlike Romney’s kids). And now you’re back from Baghdad (Green Zone or combat?) and you expect people on this website to kiss your ring for it. Sound about right?
BTW, welcome home:-)
Giordano
Right of Privacy
Comment posted by Giordano on Thu, 11/29/2007 - 3:46amNo, Lee, I’m not angry with you. And I wish you and your family the best in every way possible. I don’t know who you are, and my guess, or stereotype, about who you are is obviously wrong. It was meant to be.
My point is that we don’t really know anything about anybody on this blog, for the most part, and that’s a good thing. Because the only thing that matters from that point on are the words that get posted to the blog. And that is a communications miracle. We’re all journalists now.
There seems to be some suspicion of anyone who would take a purely intellectual interest in a phenomenon that is ripping society apart, such as the drug war. Your focus is on the Iraq War, mine is on the dynamics of oppression and persecution. It’s that simple.
Almost every nark who’s collided with the StoptheDrugWar.org blog since I signed on has wanted to know who I am using the same approach you’ve used. I’ve known enough of your good buddies in Defense Intelligence to spot an intelligence scheme when I see one. They’re all transparent. But if your friends really want to know anything about me personally, they’ll have to find out the old fashioned way—by violating my civil rights.
Remember where your are; a drug site. Perhaps you’re not a nark. Maybe no one’s a nark. But please also remember that America is now a country where people doing legitimate research on the wrong topic (such as illegal drugs or even Middle Eastern studies) are not being allowed to leave the country or enter other countries.
I hope you will take a look at the other postings on StoptheDrugWar.org to learn more about this blog’s quest for justice. You can even click on ‘Giordano’ above and read all my other postings. I write to inform, shock and amuse, and I think I succeed.
Enjoy peace.
Giordano










digg
reddit





Interesting...
Comment posted by smorgan on Thu, 11/22/2007 - 1:32pmSo you admit that it's foolish to recommend lying to kids about drugs, you just claim that Romney didn't actually do that?
Reality check: he criticized Obama for telling the truth, which is the same as proposing that Obama lie instead. Obama is in the public spotlight and he's gonna have to face up to his past one way or the other. He has two choices: telling the truth or telling a lie. It is beyond obvious which course of action Romney prefers.
Romney wants children to falsely believe that politicians have never done drugs. That's fundamentally dishonest.