CHANGING MINDS, LAWS & LIVES CAMPAIGN

About DRCNetStop the Drug War (DRCNet) is an international organization working for an end to drug prohibition worldwide and for interim policy reform in US drug laws and criminal justice system. Read more about DRCNet.

Make a Donation

Want to stop the drug war? One way to help is to make a generous donation -- member support makes up a critical portion of our budget, and we can't do it without you!

some organizations DRCNet played a role in starting:


en Españolem Português

Drug War Chronicle - world’s leading drug policy newsletter

Pain Wars in the Heartland: With Their Doctor Behind Bars, Kansas Patients Wonder Where To Turn

In a drama that has been played out all too many times across the country in recent years, the Justice Department's campaign against prescription drug abuse -- if you can call it that -- came in crushing fashion to Haysville, Kansas, last month. Now, a popular pain management physician and his nurse wife are being held without bond and more than a thousand patients at his clinic are without a doctor, but the US Attorney and the Kansas Board of Healing Arts say they are protecting the public health.

It all started December 20, when federal agents arrested Dr. Stephen Schneider, operator of the Schneider Medical Clinic, and his wife and business manager, Linda, on a 34-count indictment charging them with operating a "pill mill" at their clinic. The indictment charges that Schneider and his assistants "unlawfully" wrote prescriptions for narcotic pain relievers, that at least 56 of Schneiders' patients died of drug overdoses between 2002 and 2007, and that Schneider and his assistants prescribed pain relievers "outside the course of usual medical practice and not for legitimate medical purpose."

In their press release announcing the arrests, federal prosecutors also said that four patients died "as a direct result of Schneider's actions," but the indictment does not charge Schneider or anyone else with murder, manslaughter, or negligent homicide. In all four deaths, the patients died of drug overdoses, with prosecutors claiming Schneider ignored signs they were becoming addicted to the drugs or abusing them.

A handful of Schneider's former patients have filed malpractice lawsuits, claiming they became addicted as a result of his treatments. The Kansas Board of Healing Arts was investigating several complaints against Schneider before it backed off at the beginning of 2007 at the request of federal prosecutors seeking to build their case. (The US Attorney's office in Wichita denies that it asked the board to desist, but the board insists that is in fact the case.)

Under pressure from state legislators, the board acted this week, suspending Schneider's license to practice and effectively shutting down his clinic, which had remained open with physicians' assistants writing prescriptions. That move came as a surprise to Schneider's patients and supporters, who had been engaged in negotiations with the board to keep the clinic open.

But if federal prosecutors, the state board and a few patients are painting Schneider as a Dr. Feelgood, for some of his patients, he was a life-send. Debbie Sauers was one of those patients. Suffering from the after-effects of a dissecting aortic aneurysm and chronic pain from four failed back surgeries, the former nurse said she now has nowhere to go. "The clinic is shut as of tomorrow, and today was the last day to get prescriptions filled," she said Wednesday. "Dr. Schneider was the only one who would treat me with pain medicine, and now I don't know what I'm going to do," she said.

Her efforts to find another doctor to take her on have been a stark exemplar of the stigmatization faced by pain patients whose physician is accused of being a pill-pusher. "I've had doctors' offices refuse to see me or laugh in my face or tell me to check into drug rehab when I tell them I was one of Dr. Schneider's patients," she said. "If you go to the ER, they hand you a list of drug rehab places. They put my doctor in jail, and no one will treat me now." Sauers is currently on massive doses of morphine and high-dose Lortab and says her cardiologist tells her a rapid withdrawal could kill her. "I don't know what to do," she repeated.

Darren Baker is another patient who swears by Dr. Schneider. The operator of a tree gardening service, Baker has bone spurs in his knees from years of climbing, and two years ago, he fell out of a tree, shattering both his heels. "They put all kinds of hardware in my heels, and I have to have pain medications just to walk," he said. "With the pain meds, I can't walk real well, but without them, I can't walk, period. Dr. Schneider was the only one who would treat me."

Now, like Sauers, Baker is in search of a doctor. "I haven't found one yet," he said. "I got a list today, but most of them are turning you away if you're associated with Dr. Schneider. If I can't get another doctor, I won't have any option except to retire and go on disability. I take my medicine to be a productive member of society," he said angrily. "I need my meds to survive and pay my bills and fight the daily grind. This really goes against our constitutional rights. How the hell can I pursue happiness lying in bed?"

If convicted, the Schneiders face a minimum of 20 years in federal prison, and given the multitude of counts, they could theoretically face centuries. While, since their arrests, they have been excoriated in the Kansas press and by politicians, they have also received strong support, not only from patients, but also from a national pain advocacy organization, the Pain Relief Network. Headed by Siobhan Reynolds, a former documentary film maker turned crusader after her life partner suffered horrendously from lack of adequate pain treatment before dying in 2006, the network has done highly effective advocacy on cases ranging from that of imprisoned Northern Virginia pain specialist Dr. William Hurwitz to wheelchair-bound, formerly imprisoned, and now pardoned Florida pain patient Richard Paey.

Reynolds senses a similar injustice on the Kansas prairies. "Dr. Schneider is a wonderful doctor and he ran a wonderful clinic," she said. "But the Justice Department comes in here and after the fact characterizes his medical practice as drug dealing and also after the fact decides that a patient death is caused not by a doctor but by a 'drug dealer,' making it now tantamount to murder, with a 20-year mandatory minimum. If anyone wonders why doctors don't take care of sick people, this is why."

The root of the problem, said Reynolds, is the Controlled Substances Act, under which the Justice Department determines what constitutes proper medical practice and what doesn't. "Under the act, the exchange of money for drugs is presumptively illegal, and doctors have to show they are doing medicine in an 'authorized fashion' approved by the Justice Department. Under the act, doctors are effectively presumed guilty until proven innocent. It's backwards, and it helps explain why it is so difficult to win these cases," she said.

The Pain Relief Network will shortly bring a federal lawsuit challenging the Controlled Substance Act, Reynolds said. "The act is profoundly unconstitutional and unlawful. It reverses the presumption of innocence, and we think we can win that challenge, even if we have to go to the Supreme Court."

While the network had vowed to file the lawsuit last month, it hasn't happened yet. That's because the network has been too busy putting out fires in Kansas, she said, adding that the lawsuit will be filed soon.

Meanwhile, Dr. Schneider and his wife remain jailed without bond at the request of federal prosecutors pending a first court date later this month. His patients are now scrambling to find replacement doctors with little success, especially now that other local doctors see what could await them if they apply aggressive opioid pain management treatments. And a chill as cold as the February wind is settling in over pain treatment on the Kansas plains.

Perhaps Dr. Schneider is guilty of failing to adequately screen his patients, said Darren Baker, but that's not a crime. "Pain meds are narcotics," he said. "Some people have to have them to survive, but other people just want them. I think Dr. Schneider should have covered his ass more. A drug addict is going to get his drugs, whether through a doctor or on the street. They can buffalo a doctor. But when they abuse their prescriptions, how can it be the doctor's fault? Maybe he could have done things differently, but he operated in good faith."

Politics & Advocacy Executive Branch

Enter the Autocrats

Anytime there’s a drug issue related to something, priorities get reversed in favor of an autocratic ideology that favors drug enforcement and ultimately makes no sense.

In the foregoing case, the devils of addiction have priority over pain management; this despite the fact that it’s been well known since the late 19th century that most morphine addicts can maintain their addiction and live a fairly normal, healthy life as long as their supply of morphine remains uninterrupted and pharmaceutically pure.

This phenomenon of perceiving drugs as devils has repeated itself many times throughout recent medical history.  For example, the last execution for witchcraft in Scotland was carried out in 1696 against an 18-year-old medical student named Aikenhead who had advocated the use of anesthesia for childbirth.  Using an anesthetic such as chloroform during childbirth was seen by some punitive Christian religions as thwarting God’s primeval curse on women, referring to Eve’s punishment for having tempted Adam in the Garden of Eden.

The belief that the use of a natural substance to cure or prevent a disease was a practice contrary to God’s will continued through the early 1800s.  Beginning in 1772 in England, and in 1801 in America, the Anti-Vaccination Society condemned the use of smallpox vaccinations.  Given that smallpox fatalities were responsible for an estimated ten-percent of Europe’s annual mortality rate, the Anti-Vaccination Society could be expected to self-eliminate. And it did.

Nineteenth century science cast serious doubts on the Christian assumptions of human biology and biochemistry that had crippled medical progress for centuries.  In 1828, theologians as well as scientists were absolutely stunned when a young German chemist named Dr. Friedrich Wöhler synthesized a chemical called urea from inert chemicals.  Urea was classified as a living chemical, one that had been thought to exist only in living organisms.  Its synthesis from non-living materials effectively breached a religious belief system that had previously distinguished human biochemistry from its ordinary material constituents.

The cognitive dissonance between chemicals and the human body continues to recreate itself in societies today by posing in new and plausible disguises.  The same conflict resurfaces in the acceptance and use of human embryo stem cells in research, anti-depressants, birth control, RU-486, etc.

I think that the best defense (or preferably offense) that can be used when confronting these drug or chemical superstitions, in the Schneider case anyway, is not to follow the money trail, but rather to follow the madness trail left by the drug warriors.  You will find it.  And when you do you can put the authoritarian lunatics who’ve created it on a witness stand and make it obvious to any jury in America just how crazy these people really are.

Giordano

docalex's picture

PRN vs Kansas and the DOJ - The Complete Lawsuit

Dear Drug War Chronicles, Thanks as always. I wanted to make this documentation available to your readers. I strongly urge people to read the lawsuit, which is not dense legal'ese, but which is a quite remarkable document, asserting pain relief as a fundamental human right, for starters, and demonstrating the unconstitutionality of the Controlled Substances Act.

I am not a legal mind, but it seems to me Siobhan Reynolds is staking out very interesting new legal ground here, and I am frankly puzzled by the lack of educated commentary from the mainstream anti-drug-war orgs (Chronicles being the exception that proves the rule), or the libertarian blogs, etc - despite heavy national mainstream media coverage courtesy of the Associated Press.

Anyway, here it is, the complete case: PRN vs Kansas - The Complete Lawsuit (text, footnotes, appendix, and all exhibits)

In related news, PRN and the patients of Dr. Schneider held a press conference today on the steps of the Federal Courthouse in Wichita, Kansas. TV-video of the event is included: PRN at Fed. Court - Reynolds and Patients Try to Reopen Schneider Clinic - Associated Press; WIBW TV; 2008-02-19.

Thanks,

..alex...
Alex DeLuca, M.D., MPH
Senior consultant, Pain Relief Network


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <i> <blockquote> <p> <address> <pre> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may post code using <code>...</code> (generic) or <?php ... ?> (highlighted PHP) tags.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options