CHANGING MINDS, LAWS & LIVES CAMPAIGN

About DRCNetStop the Drug War (DRCNet) is an international organization working for an end to drug prohibition worldwide and for interim policy reform in US drug laws and criminal justice system. Read more about DRCNet.

Make a Donation

Want to stop the drug war? One way to help is to make a generous donation -- member support makes up a critical portion of our budget, and we can't do it without you!

some organizations DRCNet played a role in starting:


en Españolem Português

Drug War Chronicle - world’s leading drug policy newsletter

Editorial: Why We Are Fighting to End the War on Drugs

David Borden, Executive Director

http://stopthedrugwar.org/files/borden12.jpg
David Borden
On the frequent occasions when I am asked why I oppose the drug laws, I face a quandary -- where do I start? There are so many important reasons:

  • Half a million nonviolent drug offenders clog our prisons and jails. Mandatory minimum sentences, and inflexible sentencing guidelines, condemn numerous low-level offenders to years, even decades behind bars, often based solely on the word of compensated, confidential informants. With two million people behind bars, the US leads the world in incarceration, at a level radically beyond any time in our history before a quarter century ago.

  • Prohibition creates a lucrative black market that causes violence and disorder, particularly in our inner cities, and lures young people into lives of crime. Laws criminalizing syringe possession, and the overall milieu of underground drug use and sales, encourage needle sharing and increase the spread of HIV and Hepatitis C. Thousands of Americans die from drug overdoses or poisonings by adulterants every year, most of their deaths preventable through the quality-controlled market that would exist if drugs were legal.
  • Our drug war in the Andes fuels a continuing civil war in Colombia, with prohibition-generated illicit drug profits enabling its escalation. Opium growing, and attempts to stop it, both hurt Afghanistan's attempts at nation building and help our enemies.
  • Patients needing medical marijuana, and the people who provide it to them, go without or live in fear of arrest and prosecution. Physicians' fears of running afoul of law enforcers causes large numbers of Americans who need opiates for chronic pain to go un- or under-treated.
  • Profiling assaults the dignity of members of our minority groups, and of the poor, denying them equal justice.
  • From drug testing in our schools, to SWAT teams invading our homes, privacy has been gutted.
  • Ethics in our criminal justice system are virtually the exception rather than the rule, with perjury, violations of constitutional rights, corruption and general misconduct endemic and largely tolerated -- all of it driven by the drug war.
  • Frustration over the failure of the drug war, together with the lack of dialogue on prohibition, distorts the policymaking process, leading to ever more intrusive governmental interventions and ever greater dilution of the core American values of freedom, privacy and fairness.

And that isn't even all of it, and it isn't a pretty picture. And so we oppose the drug laws -- so we fight for an end to prohibition, for legalization -- because of the harm and the injustice that prohibition is inflicting on so many different people in so many ways. And because we understand that freedom is not just the right to control our bodies and what we put in them, even though that ought to be enough. Because freedom is the right for all people on this earth, not having infringed the freedom of others, to walk down the street, to go about their business, to live as they choose not confined to a prison cell just because their personal behavior was not officially approved.

And so for so many reasons that I almost don't know where to start -- to save the lives of the addicted, so patients can be treated, for privacy, for peace, for safety, to restore ethics to government, to end the injustices large and small -- for all these reasons and more, we seek to end drug prohibition. Our views are correct, our cause is just, and we fight for it to make this a better world for all.

Politics & Advocacy The Drug Debate
borden's picture

Digg

Thanks for asking! You have brought to my attention the fact that while we have Digg buttons on all our blog posts, these Chronicle articles do not have them. I will put that on the list for our next round of web site work. In the meanwhile, if anyone knows if pages without Digg buttons on them can be "dug" in some way, let us know.

David Borden, Executive Director
StoptheDrugWar.org: the Drug Reform Coordination Network
Washington, DC
http://stopthedrugwar.org


Malkavian's picture

Mike Gravel is pro-legalization too

As far as I understand the Democrat candidate Mike Gravel is 100% pro-legalization too. Besides seeing the freedom issue clearly Mike Gravel really strikes me as a very compassionate (and passionate) man. There are some cool videos on YouTube where Gravel spells it out in true no-nonsense style.


Malkavian's picture

Yeah, right on

I agree very much with the list presented here.

Before I took the wider view to legalize all drugs I made this list just for cannabis:

1. Democratic values of freedom are more important than the risks involving use
2. Prohibition discriminates against minorities
3. Prohibition damages exceed those of the drugs in themselves
4. The eradication strategy doesn't work
5. Legalization is a condition for constructive solutions.

(Ironically, adding heroin and similar drugs to the list have, paradoxically, made my conviction stronger - because the REAL dangers are found among the drugs that kill you. Unclean cannabis is just a nuisance and a minor irritation on the lungs, but unclean heroin will kill you, and then it's suddenly not so innocent to "oppose drugs".)

Besides this somewhat older list I also wanted to bring attention to something a lot of people don't realize: that the UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961, has a hard-coded ideological slant that simply CUTS OFF certain solutions no matter how effective they may be.

As an example the UN International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) has frequently opposed "fixing rooms", ie. facilities manned by skilled personnel that can help the addicts get clean, sterile equipment, tend their wounds and see to it that they don't overdose. To create such a fixing room is, in fact, a violation of our international obligations.

The horror is two-fold. Not only does the UN oppose such fixing rooms (and many other things), and as a result they actually prohibit solutions that could be effective in reducing harms to our citizenry. But in addition a strict adherence to the UN convention would actually PREVENT proper scientific inquiry into harm reduction approaches. In my country, Denmark, I have a word for it: Danish Sharia. Yes, that's right: this is pure faith based morals that have been codified into Law, and just like in the Middle Ages those rules trump rational, pragmatic solutions.

This unreason needs to end.

UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs:
http://www.incb.org/incb/convention_1961.html


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <i> <blockquote> <p> <address> <pre> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may post code using <code>...</code> (generic) or <?php ... ?> (highlighted PHP) tags.
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options