FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 29, 2007
CONTACT: Adam Eidinger: 202-744-2671, [email protected] or Tom Murphy: 207-542-4998, [email protected]
Court Rejects North Dakota Farmersâ Bid to Grow Industrial Hemp
Congress Should Address this Problem, Says Judge
Lawsuit Motivated DEA to Offer Hemp Research Agreement to NDSU after Eight-Year Wait
BISMARCK, ND â Two North Dakota farmers, who filed a federal lawsuit in June to end the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administrationâs (DEA) ban on commercial hemp farming in the United States, had their case dismissed by federal Judge Daniel Hovland yesterday. In a 22-page decision, Judge Hovland wrote that the problem facing state-licensed hemp farmers David Monson and Wayne Hauge needs to be addressed by Congress if they hope to ever grow the versatile crop which is used in everything from food and soap to clothing and auto parts. The decision can be read at: http://www.votehemp.com/legal_cases_ND.html.
Lawyers working on behalf of the farmers are considering an appeal on a number of issues. In particular, the Court ruled that hemp and marijuana are the same, as the DEA has contended for years. However, scientific evidence clearly shows that not only is industrial hemp genetically distinct from the drug marijuana, there are also absolutely no psychoactive effects from ingesting it.
âObviously we are disappointed with the decision,â says Eric Steenstra, President of Vote Hemp, a grassroots group working to bring industrial hemp farming back to the U.S. âThe Courtâs decision shows it understands that the established and growing market for industrial hemp would be beneficial for North Dakota farmers to supply. Yet the decision overlooks Congressâs original intent â and the fact that farmers continued to grow hemp in the U.S. for twenty years after marijuana was banned. If the plaintiffs decide to appeal the case, we would wholeheartedly support that effort. We are not giving up and will take this decision to Washington, DC to prompt action by Congress on HR 1009, the Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2007, which would clarify a stateâs right to grow the crop,â adds Steenstra.
In a related development, Vote Hemp has learned that the DEA has sent a âMemorandum of Agreementâ to North Dakota State University (NDSU) which, if signed by the school, would clear the way for industrial hemp research there. NDSU filed an amicus brief in support of the farmersâ lawsuit which highlighted the universityâs eight-year struggle to secure a license from the DEA to grow industrial hemp for research as mandated by state law. âIt seems our arguments about the DEAâs delay in processing NDSUâs application have resulted in the agency finally taking positive action to allow research,â comments David Bronner, President of the Hemp Industries Association (HIA) and Dr. Bronnerâs Magic Soaps, a manufacturer of soap and other body care products using hemp oil imported from Canada.
Vote Hemp, the nation's leading industrial hemp advocacy group, and its supporters are providing financial support for the lawsuit. If it is ultimately successful, states across the nation will be free to implement their own hemp farming laws without fear of federal interference. More on the case can be found at: http://www.VoteHemp.com/legal_cases_ND.html.
Permission to Reprint: This content is licensed under a modified Creative Commons Attribution license. Content of a purely educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of DRCNet Foundation, unless otherwise noted.