Police Refuse to Take Responsibility For Botched Drug Raid
Still, the latest botched drug raid, which took place outside Albany, NY on the eve of July 4th, prompted a reaction from police that is so callous and plainly dismissive that it managed to surprise even me. The point isn't that I don't believe some police officers think this way, but that I just wouldn't expect them to reveal it as shamelessly as this.
Here is what Troy Police Sergeant David Dean told Albany's News10 correspondent Anya Tucker after the raid:
Sgt. Dean: "We did not hit the wrong house, we hit the house that the search warrant directed us to hit."
Anya: "But was that information that led up to that right?"
Sgt. Dean: "My bosses are going through this whole investigative process to make sure that we were as thorough as possible."
Anya: "What was the level of threat that you assessed prior to coming into the home?"
Sgt. Dean: "That there were weapons in the house, or that the drugs were stored in that manor."
Anya: "In this house, you found no drugs?"
Sgt. Dean: "We are not publicly speaking on that issue at this point."
Anya: "Do you think this will hurt your credibility?"
Sgt. Dean: "The last thing we want to do is enter an innocent person's home - it doesn't get us anywhere, and it doesn't hamper the drug trade."
Let's just stop there for a second. That is why they don’t want to raid the innocent? Because "it doesn't get us anywhere, and it doesn't hamper the drug trade"!? Sgt. Dean either won't acknowledge, or doesn’t even believe, that law-abiding citizens have a right not to be treated this way. No duty could be more central to police work than the protection of innocent people and property, yet that fundamental concept takes a back seat, if any at all, to the concern that police weren't able to put anyone in prison that day. And it gets worse:
Anya: "Will you be going back to clean-up the damage to the house?"
Sgt. Dean: "We just have to enter lawfully with our search warrant, that is our only obligation."
Anya: "And you can leave it in any state that you left it?"
Sgt. Dean: "Yes. We had probable cause that led us to believe there was drug activity."
Regardless of what the policy is, does that even sound right when it comes out of your mouth? What sort of public servant goes on TV and says they can trash innocent people's homes with no recourse? If nothing else, I'd be afraid that talking about it this way might lead to these draconian police powers being taken away. Such candor reflects perfectly the paramilitary mentality through which such violent and utterly unnecessary police behavior is born and repeated endlessly.
These remarks should be Exhibit A at a hearing before the state legislature. If police don't feel at all responsible for the damage they cause when they are wrong, what incentive do they have to make sure they're right? This is just another painfully predictable result of raiding homes based on the testimony of some desperate informant with everything to gain and nothing to lose by making up names and addresses at random. That appears to be exactly what happened here, and if it's not, well, don’t hold your breath for an alternate explanation.
Maybe I don't say this enough, but I respect cops. I was a criminal justice major. I've studied under them, dined with them, toured D.C. in a squad car and answered calls with them. I've witnessed heroic policing at frighteningly close range and I'll be the first to concede that a good cop is worth anything we can afford to pay.
But the great thing about good cops is that they make you feel safe, and that's the opposite of what happened here. These officers are telling the public that they can destroy your home when you've broken no law, that they don’t have to fix it, and that they needn't even explain the circumstances that brought them crashing violently into your peaceful life. Why would anyone anywhere ever want cops like that?
Gun FREEDOM
As a Jewess in the US, I was somewhat surprised that the 5 Justices of the Supreme Court who upheld the 2nd Amendment were all Roman Catholic! Wow. Looks like American Protestantry and Jewry has let us down, by contrast.
-Wendy Weinbaum
Use of SWAT for Drug Raids has to be Challenged
The latest incident of a SWAT raid performed on the wrong house should serve as an opportunity to abolish their use for these non-emergency situations. Unfortunately, the discussion at one the TV stations' website that reporting the story, this idea of questioning the use of SWAT was barely mentioned. Until someone with standing in the community is the victim of one of these raids and uses a lot of time and energy to fight for the issue, these SWAT raids are going to continue.
Go to wnyt.com and post a comment on this story. The woman who's home was raided had no criminal record, but she doesn't seem the type to make a federal case out of it. That's unfortunate since I think the Troy police will get away with this botched raid and there won't be any policy changes to avoid the next drug raid on the wrong house.
I think we all love those good cops
If anything was to go wrong we'd be so very fortunate to have one of those good cops investigating our case. The problems seems to be the unrestricted freedom given to all policemen. Not only does such absolute power present a hard to resist temptation for even good men, but over a period of many years the police institution will attract more and more of the particular brand op people that inspired this quotation:
No drug, not even alcohol, causes the fundamental ills of society.
If we're looking for the sources of our troubles,
we shouldn't test people for drugs, we should test them for stupidity,
ignorance, greed and love of power.
- P. J. O'Rourke
... and worse perhaps, fewer good people will be attracted to the trade because of the increased roghness and lack of principles in the trade. Accountability is not a bad thing. It's the natural canvas on which the mutual respect among people is painted.
Can anyone explain
to me,how this is not an example of domestic terrorism? I love my country, but I'm beginning to despise my present government. The 4th amend. was written to remove the British writ of assistance.Now we have probable(snitch) cause. I see little difference between the two forms of tyrrany.
What good cops?
There are no good cops as long as they cover for each other right or wrong. Cops will start getting respect back when they start earning it.
Remember the case in the news yesterday about the drug team that stormed a McDonald's after a suspect that supposedly had just made a purchase from an informant inside. When interviewed the head of the operation basically said that they like to do these things in public to minimize risk to their officers. Another example of the cowardice of modern law enforcement. Never mind that they place the people they are sworn to protect in mortal danger, we don't want those people who are paid to take those risks to be placed in danger. Funny thing about that is that the US Dept. of Labor statistics just don't show law enforcement to be a very dangerous job. Most construction trades have a higher mortality rate.
Post new comment