Skip to main content

Motion for Remand : Denied

Submitted by David Borden on
? Our Motion for Remand was denied on May 16, 2007 as we expected . The Motion was based on the errors our second attorney made . Some of those errors are pointed out in reference material, see: OSB disciplinary. My father and I were instructed by the attorney, our testimony concerning my son’s Motion for new Attorney would not be needed . Only after we lost the trial, did we learn our testimony could not be allowed in the appeal....... because we did not testify . The Motion for Remand was our last hope to testify. The written transcripts to the Motion for new Attorney are incorrect . See reference material : Audio Record, notice the difference in the time reading. My father, my son and I were all present on Feb. 11 2002 and we were shocked by something our Attorney said . I purchased the tape recorded transcripts by Fran Hooten . This tape was correct and had no static, we heard Mr.Coggins repeat his statement over and over again . Mom who once worked in the Judge Advocate Generals office, said Judge Barron should have removed Mr.Coggins from the case, for defending the credibility of the confidential informant . Due to the fact that we will not be testifying in a court of law, I will begin testifying here and will include my story and experiences along the way. My site has just been renewed and I will be posting soon. I believe we can all learn something from my story, please feel free to check in once and a while . note Judge Barron Letter Lowell V. Keef Jr. http://scint-stinks.com

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Permission to Reprint: This content is licensed under a modified Creative Commons Attribution license. Content of a purely educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of DRCNet Foundation, unless otherwise noted.