What do They Know?
Tensions over Amendment 44 in Colorado have reached a fever pitch as self-appointed marijuana experts continue to emerge with absurb predictions.
From TheDenverChannel.com:
A rally at the state Capitol on Friday morning turned into a shouting match between the groups for and against a proposed amendment that would legalize small amounts of marijuana in Colorado.
Gov. Bill Owens and the state's top law enforcement officers planned a press event on the west steps of the Capitol to urge voters to turn down Amendment 44, which would legalize adult possession of one ounce of marijuana.
Supporters of pot legalization tried to shout them down.
If Governor Owens is gonna say stuff like this, I can’t say I blame them:
"In addition to human costs, legalizing marijuana is sure to have an economic impact on every Colorado citizen. These costs include increased costs for substance abuse treatment and other social programs as well as lost revenue due to decreased worker productivity.”
Once again, legalizing marijuana won’t increase treatment costs. It will reduce them dramatically. Most people in marijuana treatment are enrolled against their will following an arrest, which won’t happen anymore if Amendment 44 passes.
As for decreased worker productivity, show me some data and we’ll talk. If the government had the guts to actually study this, they’d find that marijuana users who haven’t been hung out to dry by the criminal justice system are just as productive and successful as non-users; probably far more so than heavy drinkers. The data would then be buried and brought up only by us.
Next they gave the microphone to Park County Sheriff Fred Wegener:
Wegener, who is the president of the County Sheriffs of Colorado, said, "We are also concerned that legalizing marijuana will cause a spike in impaired driving fatalities and injuries caused by more motorists driving impaired on marijuana. The reality also exists that it is more difficult for law enforcement to detect impairment caused by marijuana and other drugs as compared to alcohol."
Clearly something’s got to be done about these mischievous stoners who are too sober to fail a sobriety test.
This is getting ridiculous. Is it so crazy that we want to try something different? We’re asking to step back from a policy that’s done nothing but piss people off for 70 years and these guys start giving prophesies of a great plague. What do they know?
marajuana impaired drivers undetectable
If someones driving is requires police stopping them, then what does it matter why? Get them off the road. Charge them with whatever reason they were stopped.
Judging a persons driving by their breath or urine is crazy and unnecessary. Reckless driving is a crime already.
Rick Wolfe
Exactly
Detectability increases proportionate to impairment. There's no such thing as undetectable impairment. That's what we call sobriety.
Post new comment