Vermont Decriminalizes Marijuana Possession
Vermont Gov. Peter Shumlin (D) signed into law Thursday a bill decriminalizing the possession of small amounts o marijuana. That makes Vermont the 17th state to decriminalize, including all of its neighboring New England states except New Hampshire.
[image:1 align:left]Introduced by Rep. Christopher Pearson (P-Burlington) and passed with tri-partisan support, House Bill 200 removes criminal penalties for possession of up to one ounce of marijuana and replaces them with a civil fine, similar to a traffic ticket. People under 21 will be required to undergo substance abuse screening. Under current state law, possession of up to two ounces of marijuana is a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail for a first offense and up to two years in jail for a subsequent offense.
"This change just makes common sense," Shumlin said as he signed the bill. "Our limited resources should be focused on reducing abuse and addiction of opiates like heroin and meth rather than cracking down on people for having very small amounts of marijuana."
Earlier this week, Shumlin signed a package of bills aimed at reducing problems associated with opiate use, including measures designed to reduce opiate overdose deaths.
"We applaud Gov. Shumlin, the state's top law enforcement officials, and the legislature for their leadership and support of this important legislation," said Matt Simon, a legislative analyst for the Marijuana Policy Project, which lobbied in support of the bill. "Decriminalizing marijuana possession will allow law enforcement officials to spend more time and attention addressing serious crimes and prevent people from being branded as criminals just for using a substance that most Americans agree should be legal."
But decriminalization is only a half-measure, Simon said.
"Removing criminal penalties for marijuana possession slows the bleeding, but it will not stop until marijuana prohibition is replaced with a more sensible policy," he explained. "Marijuana is objectively less harmful than alcohol, and it is time for the state to start exploring policies that treat it that way."
Comments
legalize marijuana
This is not progress
In reply to This is not progress by Legalize Heroin (not verified)
Note that Shumlin did not say
Note that Shumlin did not say "crack down" on the other drugs. He talked about reducing abuse and addiction to them. One can make efforts to reduce abuse and addiction through public health and educational measures, for example, without increasing punishments. I can't say for sure what Shumlin meant, but I suspect he is more on that wavelength.
In reply to Note that Shumlin did not say by borden (not verified)
A Fair Point
It's true Gov. Shumlin did not elaborate on how he planned to reduce "abuse" (non-medical use) and addiction. I suppose my mind went there because I've heard the line "Free the herb but lock up all the junkies" so many times by people who profess to be supporters of drug reform. Some people seem to think the war on drugs is nothing more than a war on marijuana. Sometimes I wish marijuana would just be legalized so we can get on to discussing reform of our other drug laws.
I don't live in Vermont or know much about Shumlin's politics. The fact that he signed the naloxone access and "Good Samaritan" measures are good signs. It would be nice to see some Governors come out in support of across the board decriminalization.
However consider the following, suppose because of this decrim measure cops stop going after pot smokers. But the police have the same incentives, overtime, quotas, ect. Now they know they can't bust the pot smokers anymore, so they focus on the other drug users more. Wouldn't this shift the focus to the users of other drugs regardless of what plans the Governor has to specifically reduce "abuse" and addiction? In other words the perverse incentives are built into the system to perpetuate the war on drugs, without marijuana as a target wouldn't there be increased pressure on other non-cannabis drugs regardless of the Governor's intentions? Unless Shumlin is going to shift significant resources away from law enforcement to treatment, education and prevention, I just don't see police saying, "well we can't bust pot smokers anymore, so we'll just go back to real police work (solving victim crimes like robbery, rape, murder, ect)" or will they just shift resources currently directed toward marijuana investigations to other drugs? We're only talking decrim here so the effect won't likely de dramatic (though certainly important for those who would otherwise go to jail) but down the line to full legalization I wonder if this won't be the case.
Why haven't you guys posted
Why haven't you guys posted an article about the ban of kratom taking place in Tennessee on July 1st?
Please make a post about this we need to get as many people involved as possible.
Here are the two bills:
Here is a link to Senate Bill 46: http://www.capitol.tn.gov/Bills/108/Bill/SB0048.pdf
House Bill 12: http://www.capitol.tn.gov/Bills/108/Bill/HB0012.pdf
In reply to Why haven't you guys posted by SaveKratom1 (not verified)
Thanks for the tip. I
Thanks for the tip. I forwarded the information to Phil.
Thank you. We need all the
Thank you. We need all the support we can get to get the kratom ban lifted before it even takes place.
Add new comment