Latest
Reducción de daños: Empiezan a fluir fondos para programas de cambio de jeringas en DC
Marihuana medicinal: Sigue pelea por cantidades permisibles en Estado de Washington
Policial: Las historias de policÃas corruptos de esta semana
Estudiantes: ¡Hagan sus prácticas en la DRCNet y ayuden a detener la guerra a las drogas!
Oferta: Nuevo libro singular e importante sobre la marihuana medicinal
Reportaje: Producción afgana de opio cae un poco con relación a niveles plusmarquistas
Reportaje: Fiscal general californiano dicta directrices para la marihuana medicinal â En su mayor parte buenas, pero hay algunos problemas, dicen militantes
Police Raid Wrong Address, Hit Innocent Man With the Butt of a Shotgun
Armed with a battering ram and shotguns, Buffalo police looking for heroin broke down the door and stormed the lower apartment of a West Side family of eight.
The problem is that the Wednesday evening raid should have occurred at an apartment upstairs.
And, thatâs only the tip of the iceberg, according to Schavon Pennyamon, who lives at the mistakenly raided apartment on Sherwood Street with her husband, Terrell, and six children.
Pennyamon alleges that after wrongly breaking into her apartment, police proceeded to strike her epileptic husband in the head with the butt end of a shotgun and point shotguns at her young children before admitting their mistake and then raiding the right apartment. [BuffaloNews.com]
And just listen to this pathetic excuse for an excuse:
"We wouldnât be comfortable discussing the internal investigation," [Chief of Detectives, Dennis J.] Richards said. "We can say comfortably that over 1,100 search warrants were executed last year and 580 to date this year and that, with such a high volume and such a fast-paced environment, it is understandable that mistakes could happen."
No, itâs not understandable! Itâs inevitable. It's deeply disturbing. But it is not understandable. If doing multiple aggressive drug raids each day leads to outcomes like this, then stop doing them. If you canât keep track of the addresses and your officers are clubbing the innocent, then please do something about it and donât tell us we should be more understanding.
What sort of defense is it to point out that his officers smash down 1,100 doors a year? That, rather obviously, is exactly the problem.
Prosecutor Getting Nervous in the Ryan Frederick Case
The special prosecutor in the case against Ryan Frederick, the Chesapeake man accused of killing a city detective, wants the murder trial moved out of the Hampton Roads area.
The commonwealth has urged the court for a change of venue from Chesapeake to a court elsewhere in the state. Frederick is to stand trial Jan. 20 in Chesapeake Circuit Court on charges of capital murder, use of a firearm in the commission of a felony and possession with the intent to distribute marijuana. [PilotOnline.com]
Itâs a devious move, necessitated by the fact that a lot of folks in and around Chesapeake, VA know that Ryan Frederick didnât do anything wrong. Police thought he was growing marijuana, but he wasnât. When they raided his house, he thought he was being robbed and fired on the intruders, killing an officer that he didnât realize was a cop. The marijuana growing operation they were looking for just wasnât there and Iâm still unclear on why theyâre pursuing distribution charges for the tiny amount of pot found in his home.
Letâs hope the judge has the sense to see through this sham of a trial and blocks these pathetic efforts to gain leverage for charges that should never have been filed to begin with.
Republicans Promise to Continue the Drug War
Continuing the Fight against Illegal Drugs
The human toll of drug addiction and abuse hits all segments of American society. It is an international problem as well, with most of the narcotics in this country coming from beyond our borders. We will continue the fight against producers, traffickers, and distributors of illegal substances through the collaboration of state, federal, and local law enforcement.
In 2008, Iâm beginning to doubt that anyone is going to win any votes with this kind of language. Given the risk of rubbing the libertarian crowd the wrong way, it wouldnât have surprised me to see this rhetoric left out altogether. Of course, that would have been a conspicuous omission, I suppose, and you can bet that weâd have more than a few words to say about that.
On the plus side, Pete noticed that the section called "Locking Up Criminals" omits drug crimes from the list of offenses for which the Republicans support mandatory minimum sentencing:
We support mandatory sentencing provisions for gang conspiracy crimes, violent or sexual offenses against children, rape, and assaults resulting in serious bodily injury.
Thatâs really a rather positive sign, indicating that we may be moving towards a bipartisan consensus that our drug laws have gone too far.
Iâm also tempted to theorize that Obamaâs decision to bring Biden onto the ticket may have been a contributing factor here. Months ago, Dick Morris editorialized in favor of attacking Obama on sentencing reform, arguing that by supporting revised crack sentencing guidelines, Obama wants to let thousands of crack dealers out of jail. Itâs cynical and ruthless ploy that becomes considerably harder to pull off with Biden on the ticket. Given his central role in pushing through the original sentencing disparity, and his recent evidence-based reversal, Biden has all the credibility to blow any "soft on crack" attacks back to the '80's where they belong. Iâm no fan of Bidenâs drug war record, but thereâs an interesting dynamic here, which I'll concede to those who've argued that Biden's awful history could end up providing cover for reform.
Which brings us to the obvious question: if the democrats donât support mandatory minimums for drug offenses, and the republicans donât support mandatory minimums for drug offenses, who does?
(This blog post was published by StoptheDrugWar.org's lobbying arm, the Drug Reform Coordination Network, which also shares the cost of maintaining this web site. DRCNet Foundation takes no positions on candidates for public office, in compliance with section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, and does not pay for reporting that could be interpreted or misinterpreted as doing so.)
BREAKING: People Smoke Pot at Outdoor Concerts
In August, Silverman attended a Ziggy Marley concert at the Del Mar Racetrack, just as she had the previous year, to see if pot smokers were as abundant as before. Sure enough, bongs, blunts and joints were ablaze.
Not only were the pot-puffing reggae fans not intimidated by security guards, they offered some to anti-marijuana crusader Silverman, 49. [San Diego Union-Tribune]
Actually, when the pot-smokers said "You want something, lady?" they werenât really offering her a hit, they just wanted to know why she was crawling around on all fours sniffing peopleâs belongings and blowing out their matches.
"There were very few attendees who were not smoking marijuana," Silverman said, recounting her reconnaissance mission recently to a stunned board of directors for the fairgrounds.
The board of directors was indeed stunned by Silvermanâs story, given that theyâd posted signs at every entrance reminding security not to let the notorious complainer and buzzkill, Lisa Silverman, into any more reggae concerts.
At a recent concert at the Cricket Wireless Amphitheatre in Chula Vista, hip-hop superstar Snoop Dogg concluded his set by urging listeners to "smoke some chronic," slang for high-grade marijuana.
"Almost immediately, you could see the plumes of smoke go up," Kelly said.
San Diego songwriter Steve Poltz said he remembers attending an outdoor concert featuring James Taylor when the mellow superstar caught a whiff of marijuana smoke.
"Ah, yes," Taylor mused. "The fine scent of herb being carried on the evening zephyr."
At which point someone shouted "Dork!" and Taylor was struck with a flying beer can, proving yet again why people shouldnât be allowed to use marijuana in public.
$20,000 Bond for One Ecstasy Pill
As I read through my Google News alerts each day, I usually just ignore the multitudes of petty drug arrests that made headlines for no reason. But this one jumped out at me:
Police: Winston-Salem man had ecstasy pillGastonia Police arrested a Winston-Salem man Saturday and charged him with having the party drug ecstasy.
Jasmon Delshon Mackey, 27, of the 2200 block of Bethabara Point in Winston-Salem, was arrested at the Kingsway convenience store at 1418 W. Garrison Blvd. He had one ecstasy pill, according to a police affidavit. [Gaston Gazette]
Who cares? Why is this in the newspaper? It shouldnât even be a crime, but if it is, one would hope youâd have to have more than, say, one pill in order to find your name in the f#%king newspaper.
The only thing newsworthy about this is the embarrassing fact that possession of one ecstasy pill is apparently a serious crime that can only be resolved by a whole team of criminal justice professionals.
Mackey was charged with felony possession of a Schedule I controlled substance. He was jailed on a $20,000 bond.
For having a pill whose side effects include happiness, empathy, and dancing.
Pagination
- First page
- Previous page
- …
- 803
- 804
- 805
- 806
- 807
- …
- Next page
- Last page