Skip to main content

Latest

Chronicle
Chronicle

Semanal: Blogueando en el Bar Clandestino

“Jonathan Caulkins vs. El debate aburrido sobre la lucha contra la droga”, “Si la salvia no es tóxica no adictiva, ¿cuál es el argumento para prohibirla?”, “Cómo consumir drogas sin arruinar nuestras vidas”, “Miembros del jurado contraatacan guerra contra la marihuana medicinal”, “Fume un porro, haga que despidan a su jefe”, “Si la lucha contra la droga tiene sentido para ti, nada más tendrá”.
Chronicle
Chronicle
Chronicle
Chronicle
Chronicle
Chronicle

Marihuana medicinal: Víctima de TEPT demanda a centro de terapia del dolor de Virginia Occidental por dispensarlo porque fuma marihuana en busca de alivio

Con demasiada frecuencia los consumidores de marihuana se topan con problemas con los practicantes de medicina que los consideran nada más que toxicómanos. Ahora, una víctima de Trastorno por Estrés Postraumático de Virginia Occidental demanda al médico y a la clínica que lo dispensaron porque consumía marihuana para aliviar sus síntomas.
Chronicle
Chronicle
Chronicle
Chronicle
Chronicle

Reportaje: Fondo de becas en honor a John W. Perry, héroe del 11 de septiembre, auxilia a más estudiantes que pierden ayuda financiera a causa de condenaciones por delitos de drogas

La disposición antidroga de la Ley de Enseñanza Superior [<em>Higher Education Act</em> (HEA, por su sigla en inglés)] impide que estudiantes con condenaciones por delitos de drogas obtengan ayuda financiera por períodos específicos. El Fondo John W. Perry fue creado para ayudar a algunos de esos estudiantes y crear conciencia de la injusticia del dispositivo. Este año, está ayudando a dos estudiantes a permanecer estudiando.
Chronicle

Reportaje: Pelea a causa de iniciativa por Ley de Recuperación del Infractor No Violento de California empieza a calentarse

En noviembre, los residentes californianos votarán en una tremenda iniciativa complicada de “tratamiento en vez de cárcel” conocida como Ley de Rehabilitación del Infractor No Violento [<em>Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act</em> (NORA, por su sigla en inglés)], la cual aparecerá en la votación como Propuesta 5 [<em>Proposition 5</em>]. Ahora las líneas de batalla se están formando.
Chronicle

Reportaje: Comisión de Penas de EE.UU. examinará alternativas a encarcelación

Después de un simposio de verano que reunió a expertos en cuestiones de justicia penal y condenación, la Comisión de Penas de EE.UU. ha anunciado que va a convertir las alternativas a la encarcelación en una de sus prioridades para el próximo año. Con un récord de más de 200.000 personas en prisión federal – siendo que más de la mitad es de infractores de la legislación antidroga -, es una buena noticia.
In The Trenches

Marijuana Decriminalization Campaign Uncovers Criminal Acts by Opposition

Dear friends:

You might think that the people who are paid to uphold the law would also follow the law themselves. In Massachusetts, you'd be wrong.

The Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy (CSMP) — which is running the campaign to pass a marijuana decriminalization ballot initiative in Massachusetts this Election Day — has uncovered at least 15 violations of Massachusetts campaign finance and election laws committed by the Massachusetts District Attorneys Association and other opponents of the initiative. You can read media coverage of yesterday's press conference calling for charges to be filed here.

If you support forcing marijuana policy reform opponents to follow the law, please help out the campaign today.

CSMP has filed official complaints with the Office of Campaign and Political Finance and the Office of the Attorney General, charging that opponents of the initiative participated in 14 counts of raising funds illegally, as well as one count of publishing false statements relating to the initiative, which are clear violations of the law. The campaign is calling on the Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance to punish them to the fullest extent of the law. Each violation carries a penalty of up to a year in jail and a $1,000 fine.

Specifically:

  • Under Massachusetts law, it is illegal to solicit, receive, or spend funds to support or oppose a ballot initiative without first forming a political committee. CSMP has from its inception followed all of these rules, but the district attorneys solicited, received, and spent donations before they were legally allowed to — blatantly ignoring state law in a cynical attempt to conceal their campaign activity for as long as they could, undermining the very laws they have sworn to uphold.
  • Additionally, the district attorneys used public funds to post and house a statement urging voters to reject the decriminalization initiative on its Web site ... clear, indisputable violation of Massachusetts election law, which prohibits public officials from using public resources to advocate for or against a ballot initiative.
  • What's more, this illegal statement — itself an abuse of public office and taxpayer resources — is riddled with bald-faced lies ... like the claim that the initiative would permit any person to carry and use marijuana at any time. In reality, the measure simply changes the type of penalty for possession of less than an ounce and specifically reiterates that public use remains illegal.

It's past time for prohibitionist officials to be held to the same standards and laws as everyone else. If you support these aggressive tactics to hold our opponents accountable for their lies, deception, and lawbreaking, would you please consider donating $10 or more to the campaign today?

Thank you,
Kampia signature (e-mail sized)

Rob Kampia
Executive Director
Marijuana Policy Project
Washington, D.C.

P.S. If convicted, the initiative opponents would risk more than fines and jail time. They'd also face loss of their driver's licenses, suspension of their licenses to practice law or medicine; and placement in a permanent database of offenders that employers, landlords, and schools can search and use to preclude offenders from getting jobs, housing, and school loans ... the same penalties that marijuana offenders currently face in Massachusetts and which the ballot initiative would remove.