California Good Samaritan Drug Overdose Bill Signed Into Law

In Theory it seems great but in practice it must rely on multiple things one cannot just assume - 1. Each state /.district / province has different immunity protections- do those persons who may witness an overdose know what protections are provided them by state ? I think the answer is NO . If I am a Califormia DRUG DEALER and my client that I sold heroine to just 30 minutes before goes into cardiac arrest and I report it- i will lose all of my drugs to confiscation andlikely this will punish me to make it up- Further , immunity DOES NOT APPLY to me- Drug Dealers are NOT IMMUNE- so this law cherry picks who is and who is not subject to arrest , incarceration and negative consequences. I will always lose whatever drugs and or paraphanalia I have on me. If I also happen to be an addict - i am unduly influenced more by my bodily cravings and likely not wanting to lose my drugs and or be detained. If I am detained and or arrested , my family and others like employers can then find out and m ability to even clean up and find work may be negatively effected- employers regularly do background checks- The GOOD SAMARITAN LAW is known only to drug users with prethought who look it up- i myself just looked it up or I would have been unaware and upon reading mine for california- would possibly not want to subject myself to the comsequences of reporting an overdose if i were in any of the top situations- The real issue here is not weather a Good Samaritan Law exists in my state but rather that the state has taken ownership over what I can put into my body and that the above motivations for not calling 9-11 or seeking out help for a person showing overdose symptoms would simply NOT EXIST IF : Drugs were legalized and I had ownership over my own person- Could I then without hesitation get help? YES I COULD AND WOULD Further - one must remember that Prisons are FOR PROFIT- based upon having PRISONERS - most of the United States Prosons for profit are non violent drug offences- Also the huge cost of illegal drugs would go down just like alcohol did, when made legal- The good Samaritan Law relys on college kids and others to have gone over the law with a fine tooth comb to find out who and what iscand or is not immune from reporting overdose- The ridiculous nanny state cannot even manage to build in provisions which actually work . They would rather protect prisons for profit and the pharmaceutical chemical monopoly ehich actually and statistically still kills around one million users of legally prescribed synthetic drugs per decade while enjoying cartel protections of the FDA - a proven farce - This is not really about an entity that cares as it is about the US drug buisness and pharmeceutical profits - What , ask yourself, do private pridons NEED to make a profit? PRISONERS How do you get more prisoners? You lobby to make more things illegal - food for thought

Hello my name is Anthony and in October 2021 I overdosed on fentanyl my children’s mother kick down the door and resuscitated me. Subsequently this led to the removal of our children under welfare and institutions code 300 and then following welfare and institutions code 301 (B) (1) failure to protect. I was also charged with endangering a child under Penal Code section 273 (b). The fentanyl overdose and resolution team comprised of Department of Homeland Security the drug enforcement agency in Fresno Police Department were only able to find trace elements of subatomic fentanyl particles. No fentanyl was found with the naked eye it took a laboratory technician to swab down my entire bathroom which was behind three different locked doors. Including: A childproof lock on my bedroom door, a conventional lock on the same door, and a conventional lock on my bathroom door. Nonetheless, the children were removed despite failure to meet the elements of welfare and institutions code 300. The officers later called and apologized profusely for making “a bad call”. The children’s mother was present and sober and she had just moved here from Texas and did not have emergency shelter as she did not have access to my wallet or my phone. They removed the children based on the foregoing. The children’s mother was not offered any reasonable services such as being put up in a hotel for a night, A parent partner, or any other alternative other than the removal of the children. If any help or general information can be provided it would be greatly appreciated .