Skip to main content

Vermont Marijuana Decriminalization Bill Stalled

Submitted by Phillip Smith on (Issue #722)
Drug War Issues

Although it has the support of the governor and the public, a Vermont bill to decriminalize the possession of small amounts of marijuana is stalled, held hostage by a hostile House speaker, the Barre-Montpelier Times-Argus reported Saturday.

Vermont Speaker of the House Shap Smith is blocking a decriminalization bill. (State of Vermont)
Under the bill, House Bill 427, possession of less than an ounce by people 21 and over would be punishable by no more than a $150 fine. People aged 18-20 would be subject to the fine on a first offense and a drug awareness course or community service on the second offense. Minors would be subject to drug awareness or community service for a first offense and could be fined up to $300 for failure to comply. Current law mandates up to six months in jail and a fine of up to $500 for simple possession.

Speaker of the House Shap Smith is blocking the bill. Tom Cheney, an aide of Smith's, told the Times-Argus the bill will not make it to a floor vote this session. Cheney said Smith had concerns that some in the state’s law enforcement community may not support the legislation.

That wouldn't include Commissioner of Public Safety Keith Flynn, who has said he supports decriminalization and that the state should make better use of its law enforcement resources. That also wouldn't include Gov. Peter Shumlin (D), who has said he supports decriminalization because it would free up law enforcement resources.

Flynn and Shumlin are joined by a majority of the state's voters in supporting decriminalization according to a poll last week. Commissioned by the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP), which is pushing the legislation, the Public Policy Polling survey found that 63% supported decriminalization as envisioned in HB 427, with only 29% opposed. The poll also found that 52% said if their legislator voted for decriminalization, they would be more likely to vote for him or her, while only 25% would be less likely.

"It's time for legislative leadership to bring this sensible proposal to a vote, so that Vermont can focus its limited criminal justice resources on crime with actual victims," said Karen O'Keefe, MPP director of state policies.

Somebody needs to get the Speaker of the House on the same page as his colleagues, his governor, and the people of Vermont.

Permission to Reprint: This content is licensed under a modified Creative Commons Attribution license. Content of a purely educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of DRCNet Foundation, unless otherwise noted.


Justin Auldphart (not verified)

Well call me stupid but what does the fact that "that some in the state’s law enforcement community may not support the legislation" have to do with anything?

Mon, 02/20/2012 - 8:00pm Permalink
TrebleBass (not verified)

In reply to by Justin Auldphart (not verified)

and if some may not support the legislation wouldn't that mean that some must support it? why not allow in the name of "some" (the other "some")? plus, since when is law enforcement in charge of making the laws?

Tue, 02/21/2012 - 3:08am Permalink
kickback (not verified)

Shap must have future political ambitions . He hopes the anti- cannabis crowd will propel him to victory . What he fails to see and understand , is that the majority of the public now supports Cannabis legalization . Only sadist`s , law enforcement and banker`s support Cannabis prohibition . This ain`t rocket science .

Wed, 02/22/2012 - 1:45am Permalink
guest1 (not verified)

Look at that smile - it says "I'm taking money from Big Pharma"  yippee!!

Thu, 02/23/2012 - 11:37am Permalink

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.