Feature: More Than A Quarter Million Marijuana Smokers in Drug Treatment Each Year -- Are We Wasting Valuable Treatment Resources?

Even as the demand for drug treatment slots continues to grow, an increasing number of people who enter drug treatment are being treated for marijuana as their primary drug of abuse, leading some observers to question whether scarce drug treatment resources are being wasted on people who don't need drug treatment. In its most recent set of drug treatment statistics released last week, the 2007 Treatment Episode Data Sets (TEDS), the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) reported that some 288,000 people underwent treatment for marijuana that year, or 15.8% of all drug treatment episodes.

marijuana -- sometimes but not usually a reason for treatment
The number is actually down slightly from its 2005 peak of 301,000 people in treatment for marijuana, but in line with trends for the past decade. Since 1997, the number of people getting treatment for marijuana each year has increased by roughly 50%, or about 100,000 people.

Former drug czar John Walters was fond of using the increase in the number of people being treated for marijuana to argue that it showed the increasing seriousness of marijuana use as a drug problem, but a closer look at the SAMHSA paints a different picture.

Of the people getting treatment for marijuana in 2007, 37.7% had not even smoked in the past month, raising questions about whether they even met the standard (but still arguable) definitions of marijuana abuse or dependence. When you add in the number who had smoked 1-3 times in the past month, the number rose to 53%. Other data set numbers raise similar questions. Only 14.8% of people in treatment for marijuana were self-referrals, as opposed to 56.9% getting treatment because they were ordered to by a court and another 28% in treatment because of referrals from family, schools, employers, or substance treatment or medical providers.

By way of contrast, the self-referral percentages for other drugs are much higher. Among alcohol users in treatment, 29% were self-referrals, for heroin, 58%; cocaine, 36%. Only methamphetamine users had a similar self-referral rate, with 20%.

People in treatment for marijuana are also younger than people in treatment for other drugs. For marijuana, 40% were under 19 at the time of admission, compared to 9% for stimulants, 11% for alcohol, 5% for opiates, and 3% for cocaine. A whopping 75% of people in treatment for marijuana were under age 30, compared to no more than 40% for any other of the major drugs.

The American Psychological Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) defines substance abuse as "a maladaptive pattern of substance use leading to clinically significant impairment or distress, as manifested by one or more of the following occurring within a twelve-month period:

(1) Recurrent substance use resulting in a failure to fulfill major role obligations at work, school, or home (e.g. repeated absences or poor work performance related to substance use, substance related absences, suspension, or expulsions from school; neglect of children or household).

(2) Recurrent substance use in situations in which it is physically hazardous (e.g. driving an automobile or operating a machine when impaired by substance use).

(3) Recurrent substance related legal problems (e.g. arrest for substance related disorderly conduct).

(4) Continued substance use despite having persistent or recurrent social or interpersonal problems caused or exacerbated by effects of substance (e.g. arguments with spouse about consequences of intoxication, physical fights).

While it would appear questionable that all those people being treated for marijuana fit those criteria, a SAMHSA researcher said this is indeed the case. Deborah Trunzo, DASIS team leader for SAMHSA's Office of Applied Statistics, said that DSM diagnosis is not reported by all states, but in those states that did report: "Almost three quarters of marijuana admissions for whom DSM diagnosis was reported in 2007 had a DSM diagnosis of marijuana abuse or dependence. The remaining quarter had a DSM diagnosis of abuse or dependence on another substance or a psychiatric disorder. The data from 2006 were similar."

The no use in the past month figures for marijuana are not that shocking either, said Dr. Peter Delaney, Assistant Surgeon General and director of the Office of Applied Studies at SAMHSA. "You may have noticed that 29% of all admissions report no use of their primary substance in the 30 days prior to admission ranging from a low of 16% for heroin to a high of 50% for hallucinogens," Delaney pointed out. "There are a number of explanations for this including individuals coming into treatment may have been on a wait list and may not be currently using their primary drug of choice while preparing to enter treatment -- individuals enter treatment from the jail, other treatment settings, or are referred from court even though they have been abstinent for some time."

There are other explanations, too, Delaney said. "Some people may not be using marijuana presently but report it as the 'favorite' drug, others who are referred for marijuana problems may actually be reporting that alcohol is the problem but the referral trumps the report and finally, as one of the state representatives noted when asked about this phenomenon, many individuals entering treatment do not tell the truth about their use, and providers often see increases in reporting of use at discharge because treatment works."

Not surprisingly, drug reformers, academics and treatment professionals had significantly different takes on the SAMSHA marijuana treatment numbers and what they mean.

"There really is marijuana dependence, and there is an effective treatment for it, but, as the SAMSHA data reveal, it has little to do with what's going on in treatment programs around the US," said Dr. Mitch Earleywine, associate professor of psychology at the State University of New York -- Albany and author of "Understanding Marijuana: A New Look at the Scientific Evidence."

The problem is with the way marijuana fits into the hallmark symptoms of dependence, which are tolerance and withdrawal, Earleywine said. "It is hard to document marijuana tolerance, but the Marinol (THC) studies show tolerance so everyone assumes there must be marijuana tolerance. Also, novice users are less good at knowing how much of a hit they can hold, so experienced users often look more sensitive to marijuana because they're really just more efficient about how they smoke," he said.

Marijuana withdrawal is so subtle it took 2,000 years to document, Earleywine added. "The symptoms are irritability, moodiness, disturbed sleep, craving for marijuana, and -- get this -- loss of appetite," he noted. "When withdrawal occurs, it appears to dissipate within about three weeks, at most." For Earleywine, marijuana withdrawal is about as serious as withdrawal from caffeine.

"The SAMSHA data's suggestion that folks in treatment haven't used marijuana in a month makes it pretty clear that they aren't really dependent at the time of treatment," Earleywine said. "That fact doesn't mean they couldn't benefit from some therapy, but it confirms that an inpatient stay is ridiculous. And yes, someone addicted to crack or meth is missing the chance if some marijuana user is in the program instead."

Noting that only about 15% of people in treatment for marijuana sought treatment themselves and more than half are there because of the courts, Earleywine suggested that most of the rest don't need to be there, either. "Usually, those remainder folks are in there because some family member found a joint and demanded treatment. As you can imagine, clinical work with these guys can be a complete waste of time."

He cited a case in point. "I remember one case that involved a woman in her early twenties in a wheelchair who lived with her parents," he related. "Her folks found her stash and sent her to a ritzy place filled with Betty Ford types. The poor woman had no negative consequences at all. The first week she kept stating this fact but it was interpreted as 'denial,' so she had to spend the next two weeks pretending she really had a problem so the staff would tell her parents that she was making progress."

Earleywine was similarly critical of the DSM-IV criteria for dependency that included repeated legal problems related to smoking pot. "Obviously, these are a confounding of drug laws and enforcement practices. If abuse statistics rise, it can have little to do with the drug or the rates of misuse and everything to do with how much the cops feel like busting people."

"These figures show that there are an awful lot of people in treatment for supposed marijuana abuse or dependency who, by everything we can glean from the numbers, don't look very much like addicts," said Bruce Mirken, communications director for the Marijuana Policy Project. "They are disproportionately employed compared to people in treatment for other drugs, especially when you consider how young the population in treatment for marijuana is. Their lives have not been rendered unlivable by a drug problem, but because of an arrest, they are given a choice between treatment and jail when they actually need neither," he said.

"What is really striking is the extraordinarily high percentage of people referred by the criminal justice system versus the amazingly low percentage of self-referrals. These are not people who walked into the clinic saying 'I need help,'" Mirken said.

"These are people being coerced into treatment mandated by the courts," said Paul Armentano, Deputy Director for the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML). "Nationally, more than half have been referred to treatment by the criminal justice system. These are people who have been arrested, they're likely not regular users, they quit using while going through the court system, but are mandated to take treatment to avoid going to jail. You don't see this pattern when it comes to other drugs, where people are much more likely to seek treatment themselves."

"These figures reflect the obsessions and myopia of the Bush administration," said Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance. "Part of it reflects the ideology of abstinence -- that once you're in the system you have to stay clean. But it means that people who are recreational marijuana users are unnecessarily put into treatment, wasting their time, money, and energy, and wasting valuable treatment resources. Most people understand that marijuana treatment programs are mostly silly, but everyone has to participate in the charade because possession or use of marijuana remains a criminal offense."

Patricia Greer, president of the executive committee of the Association for Addiction Professionals, was reluctant to downplay marijuana abuse or dependency, but did hint that perhaps some people in treatment did not need to be there. "If you are a chronic user, you could probably use treatment," she said, "but if you're a recreational user just smoking on the weekend, why not treat it like a DWI with a little counseling?" she suggested.

Greer was also hesitant to differentiate between problems with different drugs. "Empirically, they may look different, but in terms of psychological dependence, they are very much alike," she said. "The question is whether your life is unmanageable, are you experiencing employment, school, or relationship consequences. If so, you have a problem. Marijuana may not look that serious, but if it's serious to the people around you, then, yes, it's serious."

There is a small percentage of the marijuana using population who can fairly be identified as dependent, said Armentano. "The Institute of Medicine study said that among those who smoked marijuana, about 9% may exhibit some symptoms of dependency at some point in their lives. Other reviews have placed that number much lower," he noted. "Still, there are a small number who probably are, and those are the people who are voluntarily checking themselves in for treatment."

But there is dependency and then there is dependency, Armentano argued. "People become dependent on all sorts of things, but it's important to delineate marijuana from many other substances when we're talking about physical dependence," he argued. "If alcohol addicts try to quit cold turkey, they can die from withdrawal, and alcohol is not alone in that. But if we're talking about marijuana, we're not talking about serious withdrawal symptoms; we're talking about a little irritability and maybe a couple of nights of trouble falling asleep."

"The majority of our people are being treated for alcohol dependence," said Christine Jones, clinical supervisor for the Pennington County City/County Alcohol and Drug Program in Rapid City, South Dakota. "People with chronic alcoholism remain our biggest problem. For a few years, we had an awful lot of meth, but now it's OxyContin and prescription opiate abuse."

When asked specifically about marijuana, Jones said it is common as a secondary drug of abuse, but her facility was mainly treating alcoholism and meth and opiate dependence. "We have a few who are primary marijuana abusers, but the numbers are way higher for alcohol," she said. "Most of our clients are court ordered."

That led Jones to ask whether the treatment community was doing its job properly. "The question is how well does the substance abuse field do at gate-keeping so that it is addressing clinical needs rather than judicial concerns," said Jones. She said that treatment providers should be assessing clients through procedures such as the American Society for Addiction Medicine's patient placement criteria, which uses a six-dimensional matrix to assess treatment needs. "It is the responsibility of the drug and alcohol field to ensure that the level of treatment they are obtaining is appropriate for what their needs are," she said.

"If you have a marijuana smoker, and he is using occasionally and holding a job and maintaining his responsibilities, it's a misuse of money to send him to a treatment center," said Jones. "Use isn't an automatic indicator that someone needs treatment, but if someone is having repeated problems with marijuana and lots of other problems in his life, you might want to take a look at how the problems and the marijuana use are related," she said.

But drug reformers remained unconvinced, and had suggestions for what to do. "We need to change our marijuana laws," said Mirken. "There is probably a small percentage of people who have a genuine problem with marijuana, and treatment should be available for them, but not coerced treatment for marijuana possession, which is leading to a completely dysfunctional situation. In most states, there are waiting lists for treatment slots. You have to ask how many treatment slots are being occupied by court-ordered marijuana treatment when there are folks with serious problems with cocaine and heroin sitting on waiting lists and not getting help. If that's the case, it's an outrage."

"The single most important thing we can do is make treatment available for people who want it before they get arrested," said Nadelmann. "To the extent that people are being diverted to treatment in the criminal justice system, we have to insist on the primacy of treatment principles over criminal justice principles. When the criminal justice system is involved in drug treatment, that means coerced abstinence, and that's a fundamental problem. Abstinence may work for some people, but it is a mistake to apply that to entire populations of people with drug issues caught up in the criminal justice system," he said.

"There's a superb treatment for marijuana dependence developed by Roger Roffman at the University of Washington and his colleagues," said Earleywine. "It consists of about 12 sessions of outpatient meetings that focus on identifying why you want to quit, what situations usually lead to use, how to change your thoughts about use, how to prevent relapse, how to handle various life stressors, and great ways to plan alternative fun activities. Extremely few programs around the country use this approach. Most of the drug treatment centers around the country have inpatient stays and 12-step meetings with the occasional watered-down group version of some of the topics from the established treatment."

"It's absurd to mandate people attend treatment who don't need it, it's a waste of taxpayer and private dollars," said Armentano. "There are hundreds of thousands of people seeking treatment for real drug problems who can't get it because treatment slots are limited. To think that we are sending hundreds of thousands of marijuana users to treatment who don't need it at a time when treatment resources are so limited is just ridiculous. This is a policy that is purposefully endangering the health of those who most desire or need drug treatment."

Permission to Reprint: This article is licensed under a modified Creative Commons Attribution license.
Looking for the easiest way to join the anti-drug war movement? You've found it!

Follow the Money

The important thing is, the mental health clinic is makin' money while doling out "social justice" and "behavioral supervision.

Solution is Simple... stop the illegal arrests and detentions!

Just add the rehabbers to the list of 'drug-war whores'... who profit mightily from the criminal enterprise known as the drug war.

How stupid are these people anyway when they reference 'Drug and Alcohol' addiction?
Haven't they learned yet that alcohol is a drug.... amerika's national drug in fact... it's like saying where fighting drugs and drugs.

Sounds like these prohibitionist wankers are in deep denial and in desperate need of rehab themselves... nothing a reality check can't fix.

Another Big Tobackgo program

Coupled with the 800,000 arrests, this is part of the systemic vindictive drive to disrupt work and family lives, terrorize, humiliate and degrade cannabis users in order to make tobacco use appear less harmful by contrast and any alternative to hot burning overdose nicotine cigarettes too risky to attempt. Follow the money: legislators and government officials are paid by Big Tobackgo (it's the taxes, stupid) to protect its profit empire. Also, though the actual amount given to election campaigns does not seem large, never forget that every candidate receiving tobacco money has implicitly authorized the companies to send young, well-dressed, well-trained articulate lobbyists to nudge him or her in the "right" direction. The slander that cannabis is a "drug" and that arrestees need "treatment" is a pro-tobackgo tactic.


Of course there's thousands in for "Marijuana Rehab" When the courts give someone busted with a joint 2 choices - Jail or Rehab, is it no surprise what people choose?

Just more numbers for the DEA to Peacock around , and it's disgusting, Those Rehab spaces being filled with recreational Cannabis users should be going to people who have severe Drug Problems, people who are in the grips of Heroin, Cocaine, Meth & Alcohol addictions, and to the lesser talked about Prescription Drug addicts - Percocet, Oxycondon, Vicodin, etc.. Those things will kill you, no one has ever overdosed on Marijuana.

If the Government wants to truly help people, they should stop being a Sheep to the DEA, stop incarcerating Marijuana users for simple possession, and take care of people who have bigger Addiction problems than that of someone smoking some Pot chillin' out with their friends on a Saturday night once every couple of months.

And what of all those Politicians who smoked Marijuana but just never got caught? Where would they be now if they had gotten swallowed up by an unjust system? Would we have President Barack Obama if he had ended up in Jail or Rehab because he smoked a Natural Plant? How can he, holding the Highest Position in America, condemn those for something he has done himself?

this is powerful reporting on a critical subject

it really deserves widespread distribution.

How do they treat it? If

How do they treat it?

If treatment availability is so limited, then clearly the treatment industry isn't hurting for customers, which means their pecuniary influence can't be behind this.

Here it is treatment or jail.

Here in south Arkansas, we have one hell of a scam running. The "officials", determine who has a problem. If you are deemed to have a drug problem, you will go off to treatment or jail. Of course if you get caught smoking a joint, you must have a problem, off to treatment you go, and you will be charged a fine of about $2000. Of course if you can convince the good folks, that you have found "the lord", you might get a break, but don't count on it. I know of a young "slow" man, he suffered a brain injury, he got caught with a joint, now he is making payments to the court, out of his princely SSI check of $698. That's faith based government here in Arkansas, ain't it wonderful? And evidently we prefer having criminals protecting our youth.

how are they on drunk driving in south Arkansas?

or does it depend on who you know?

double standard

Well, you would get busted if you were a damned Yankee, for sure! The Good Ole' Boy network still flourishes, there! It is, just, the practice of justice as usual, in the rest of the country! Have people not figured out that the "peons" don't deserve the same "justice" that the "elites" do?

Difference between a Yankee and a damned Yankee? The Yankee just comes to visit. The, damned, Yankee won't go home!

Pot Rehab: A Scam Begging for a Congressional Investigation

It seems the more one learns about the drug rehab biz, the stranger it gets.  See Sharp Press has some excellent books exposing the rehab industry, including how to deal with coerced drug treatment methods imposed by various types of sadists (See Resisting 12-Step Coercion: How to Fight Forced Participation in AA, NA, or 12-Step Treatment, by Stanton Peele, Charles Bufe, and Archie Brodsky, and Alcoholics Anonymous: Cult or Cure?, by Charles Bufe. Intro. by Stanton Peele).

Although the current stats may be slightly different, not long ago the failure rate for rehab was 87-percent.  Another interesting number was the fact that something like 93-percent of all rehab clinics used the 12-step method.  A New York court determined 12-step to be essentially a religion, which it is.  A lingering problem is that many people diverted into drug rehab in lieu of incarceration don’t have $30K or even $4K to spend at a resort-based, secular drug treatment clinic.  Because 12-step programs are essentially free, the poor get a megadose of religion instead.  Somewhere in the middle of this drug rehab mess is likely to be found a violation of church-state separation.

My reaction to these numbers was that a cabal of religious fanatics was merely using drug rehab as an excuse to give marijuana and other drug users a Bible enema.  The failure rate of 87-percent looked as if it included pot smokers who resumed smoking when they no longer had Big Brother looking over their shoulders into their pee cups.  While the state regards marijuana relapse to represent a failure, the marijuana users undoubtedly consider it a huge bonus.  These differing standards for success will continue to perplex and plague drug warriors as they argue that they’re making a positive difference in the lives of their victims.

One big dilemma is that the people who run drug enforcement and drug rehab operations believe their own hype.  Little can be done about this problem.  At this point, getting the drug warriors to recognize the truth about pot and pot smokers would most likely require an army of cult deprogrammers.  The drug warriors effectively need their own rehab to eliminate their ignorance on drug issues.

It is essential that no one buckle to the drug rehab Taliban.  With marijuana prohibition in place, rehab is reduced to little more than a piece of the judicial industrial complex.  Rehabbers demand and depend on people’s forced compliance to the idea that their brainwashing techniques have been successful in order to make marijuana rehab look good to the world at large.  Judges hear these rehab “success” stories all the time from defendants at drug sentencing hearings, the same defendants who will say anything it takes to get out from beneath the judicial wheel.  Without this manipulated and coerced compliance, the drug rehab scam has no real power.


The insurance fraud that is

The insurance fraud that is going on here is huge. No wonder healthcare cost are out of sight. The APA is nothing more than a labor union that looks out for the financial well being of the mental health industry. Anyone who walks into a mental healthcare providers place of business will be stigmatized with some type of label. It is all about Money!

Ca. Marijuana Law

I'm wondering how the enevitable passing of Prop 19 is going to work.  So many lies and deceptions seem to get pushed through by the folks in favor of it.  They've convinced many voters (easy to do in Ca.), that drug cartels will simply go out of business and this will be a boon to police agencies throughout the state.  No police org. in Ca. agrees and rightly so.  The drug war will go on, in fact it will intensify due to Prop. 19.  Ca. will tax the snot out of Marijuana part of their well founded plan to make billions annually.  Who will be buying it?  At Ca. Govt. prices?  When new law passes you can grow your own, or continue to buy via the drug cartels system (which isn't going anywhere).

A question I have is where will anyone smoke it?  You think anywhere?  Think again...New Ca. laws will pass quickly so Ca. can get more revenue of course.  You won't be able to smoke it outside, general health risk to children and people in general.  You know that 2nd hand smoke thing.  You can't blow your smoke wherever, you could be endangering others.  Friend of mine was allergic to it.  I didn't know that was possible, but he ate some brownies at work one day, and the ambulance had to come and take him to Stanford, he coded on the way there.  So smoking outside will be prohibited.

And what will happen if you do?  New laws will fine and incarcerate those who refuse to obey.  Sound familiar.  And what's up with this rehab business having anything to do with Marijuana.  We should demand immediate stoppage to anyone getting any treatment and anyone making $$ of Marijuana Rehab.  The proponents of the bill insist there's nothing to it.  You can't get addicted, so stop the waste of taxpayer money.  Ca. is already thinking for those who test positive behind the wheel, and if they have any alcohol in their system, then the new drunk driving level will be .04% vs, current .08%.  Since weed doesn't dissopate in our system you may have a major smoke out today, and a month from now get pulled over and still test positive.  I guess that will be just too bad.  Another Bad Law coming to Ca.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <blockquote> <p> <address> <pre> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <br> <b>

More information about formatting options

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Drug War Issues

Criminal JusticeAsset Forfeiture, Collateral Sanctions (College Aid, Drug Taxes, Housing, Welfare), Court Rulings, Drug Courts, Due Process, Felony Disenfranchisement, Incarceration, Policing (2011 Drug War Killings, 2012 Drug War Killings, 2013 Drug War Killings, 2014 Drug War Killings, 2015 Drug War Killings, 2016 Drug War Killings, 2017 Drug War Killings, Arrests, Eradication, Informants, Interdiction, Lowest Priority Policies, Police Corruption, Police Raids, Profiling, Search and Seizure, SWAT/Paramilitarization, Task Forces, Undercover Work), Probation or Parole, Prosecution, Reentry/Rehabilitation, Sentencing (Alternatives to Incarceration, Clemency and Pardon, Crack/Powder Cocaine Disparity, Death Penalty, Decriminalization, Defelonization, Drug Free Zones, Mandatory Minimums, Rockefeller Drug Laws, Sentencing Guidelines)CultureArt, Celebrities, Counter-Culture, Music, Poetry/Literature, Television, TheaterDrug UseParaphernalia, Vaping, ViolenceIntersecting IssuesCollateral Sanctions (College Aid, Drug Taxes, Housing, Welfare), Violence, Border, Budgets/Taxes/Economics, Business, Civil Rights, Driving, Economics, Education (College Aid), Employment, Environment, Families, Free Speech, Gun Policy, Human Rights, Immigration, Militarization, Money Laundering, Pregnancy, Privacy (Search and Seizure, Drug Testing), Race, Religion, Science, Sports, Women's IssuesMarijuana PolicyGateway Theory, Hemp, Marijuana -- Personal Use, Marijuana Industry, Medical MarijuanaMedicineMedical Marijuana, Science of Drugs, Under-treatment of PainPublic HealthAddiction, Addiction Treatment (Science of Drugs), Drug Education, Drug Prevention, Drug-Related AIDS/HIV or Hepatitis C, Harm Reduction (Methadone & Other Opiate Maintenance, Needle Exchange, Overdose Prevention, Pill Testing, Safer Injection Sites)Source and Transit CountriesAndean Drug War, Coca, Hashish, Mexican Drug War, Opium ProductionSpecific DrugsAlcohol, Ayahuasca, Cocaine (Crack Cocaine), Ecstasy, Heroin, Ibogaine, ketamine, Khat, Kratom, Marijuana (Gateway Theory, Marijuana -- Personal Use, Medical Marijuana, Hashish), Methamphetamine, New Synthetic Drugs (Synthetic Cannabinoids, Synthetic Stimulants), Nicotine, Prescription Opiates (Fentanyl, Oxycontin), Psilocybin / Magic Mushrooms, Psychedelics (LSD, Mescaline, Peyote, Salvia Divinorum)YouthGrade School, Post-Secondary School, Raves, Secondary School