Skip to main content

Law Enforcement: This Week's Corrupt Cops Stories

Submitted by Phillip Smith on (Issue #519)
Drug War Issues

The Detroit drug squad is under investigation, a Pennsylvania police chief is accused of stealing money from drug busts, and a Wisconsin prison has a problem with pill-stealing guards. Let's get to it:

In Detroit, the Detroit Police Department has invited the FBI to join its investigation of the department's Narcotics Unit. The move comes as the department digs into the unit's "conspiracy crews," teams of narcotics officers who work on long-term investigations of big-time drug dealers. Some members of one of the crews are suspected of stealing as much as a half million dollars. The accused officers have been reassigned to other duties pending the results of the investigation. A minimum of four officers are alleged to be involved, and perhaps more.

In Lykens, Pennsylvania, the police chief was arrested Monday for stealing money seized in drug busts. Chief W.R. Wade, who was suspended with pay two months ago, is charged with two counts of theft for stealing the money, as well as another count of unsworn falsification, for lying about a previous arrest on his job application. He is now suspended without pay. Wade went down after he announced the arrests of 21 people on drug charges, but in the end only arrested seven and failed to provide any evidence. Investigators found $3,800 in missing seized cash from one case and $200 from another in his home.

In Portage, Wisconsin, a prison guard was arrested January 7 for stealing narcotic drugs intended for sick prisoners. David Yatalese, 53, a guard at the Columbia Correctional Institution, is charged with theft, possession of a controlled substance and possession at or near a prison, a felony. According to prison officials, an internal CCI investigation tracked missing oxycodone, methadone and hydrocodone back to Yatalese after another prison worker noticed prisoners' prescriptions coming up in need of renewal too quickly. Yatalese is the third guard caught stealing prisoners' drugs in the previous 20 months. One is awaiting trial, and the other got two years probation and drug treatment. Prison officials said they have a "serious problem" and are working on solutions.

Permission to Reprint: This content is licensed under a modified Creative Commons Attribution license. Content of a purely educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of DRCNet Foundation, unless otherwise noted.

Comments

Anonymous (not verified)

We have a couple of Alleged cops here who steal drugs and money. Kevin Early, Stephon Blackwell .

Fri, 01/18/2008 - 11:31am Permalink
mlang52 (not verified)

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I live close to Anderson. I wonder if any of those in the vacinity practice the same. Allegedly, they do, according to their relatives! How many lives have been ruined by cops like this!?!? A felony bust means no job! Then, they will have to steal, just to eat!

Fri, 01/18/2008 - 12:39pm Permalink
Anonymous (not verified)

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

The Alleged Crooked Cops Kevin Early and Stephone Blackwell are a ring of 5 cops in Anderson who are stealing drugs and money and putting the drugs back on the street. You citizens, we are doing what has never been done before to my knowledge, we have organized a group who will be in front of city hall,with the date to be announced soon,and we will have the F.B.I. here from Indianapolis and several news groups also from Indianapolis and an estimated 2,000 - 5,000 people who are fed up with the corruption,and the people will be carrying no less than 100 - 200 signs asking for all people who know anything even if it may seem not that inportant to come forward with what they know so we can put these criminals behind bars so your community will be safer.UNITE TOGETHER AND YOU WILL BE SURPRISED HOW EASY WE CAN DO IT. BAD COPS , BAD COPS WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO WHEN WE COME FOR YOU. YOU GOOD COPS YOUR OUR FRIENDS AND WE LOVE YOU , KNOCK DOWN THE BLUE WALL OF SILENCE,REMEMBER THEY MAKE ALL COPS LOOK BAD AND MAKE PEOPLE BELIEVE ALL COPS ARE BAD, WHICH IS NOT TRUE, AND COST ALL TAX PAYERS LIKE YOU AND ME LOTS OF EXTRA MONEY IN TAXES FROM ALL THE LAWSUITS AGAINST THEM THAT ARE LOST. TOGETHER WE STAND AND SEPERATE WE FALL. GOD BLESS YOU ALL, GOD WILL RETURN SOON.PRINT AND PASS TO YOUR FRIENDS,FAMILY AND GET READY TO SEE A BIG CHANGE IN YOUR COMMUNITY.MAKE EXTRA SIGNS TO BRING AND THE DATE WILL BE PUBLISHED IN THE HERALD BULLITIN IN THE NEAR FUTURE AND COME TO PEACEFULLY ASSEMBLE, NO RIOTING, OR YELLING AND BRING ALL OF YOUR VIDEO CAMERA,S TO RECORD BECAUSE AFTER THIS IS OVER WE ARE MAKING A TRUE MOVIE OF HOW WE TOOK BACK OUR CITY AND EVERYONE WILL GET AN EQUAL PART OF THE PROCEEDS FROM IT , EXCEPT THE BAD COPS AND OTHER BAD PUBLIC OFFICIALS. GOD RULES WATCH AND SEE. A MIRACLE IS ABOUT TO HAPPEN.

Fri, 02/01/2008 - 3:41pm Permalink
Anonymous (not verified)

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

It's great to find that their are citizens in the US who will do the right and just thing...expose corruption within public servants. Law inforcers are required to protect and serve the public sector. I am interested in how to initiate the same action within the rural central Pennsylvania county which I reside and have been illegally manipulated by corrupt law enforcement as well as elected/appointed legal sector.

The mentality of persons in the area is stuck on stupid. Exposure to the illegalities has been needed for decades within this county and I'm so ready to pioneer the public to take action against the corruption.

If you read this, respond asap ! Any directives on how to organize a similar community movement againt corrupt powers that be would be graciously welcome. Good luck to you and all that participate. I will be liiking to hear about it int the media.

Sat, 04/12/2008 - 9:25pm Permalink
Anonymous (not verified)

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I hope those corrupt cops go to prison and get slaughtered. Nothing worse in life than a corrupt cop. I live in Vegas and they are beyond corrupt here. They are dog sh#t, I'll never respect law enforcment here again. FBI please investigate all the police shootings here in Vegas. This city is full of killers and the cops are at the top of the food chain.

Mon, 02/09/2009 - 8:29am Permalink
Anonymous (not verified)

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Is this still going on? I have a lot of information to contribute as I was married to a corrupt IMPD officer. He was with the Marion Co. Sheriff's Department and now is with IMPD. He stole, does drugs, slept with women while on duty and drives a car paid for with your tax dollars while he stalks me. Do you want to pay him a retirement also? Someone please contact me as this behavior needs to stop.

Mon, 08/24/2009 - 8:55pm Permalink
GOD IS GREAT (not verified)

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

The mayor KRIS OCKOMON and his brothers are part of the drug ring  that has been distributing drugs along with many other high ranking officials in Anderson Indiana.They have destroyed this town , many people who work for the city are involved  in buy buying drugs from these killers and they have killed many people including other cops who have gotten in their way ,The thugs put a needle of drugs in their arms to shut them up. I met one of their victims partners who was a cop in Indianapolis . Now their scared because they know they are all looking at life in prison and the death penalty for their involvement. They thought since they had someone in the  FBI OFFICE in Indianapolis in their pocket they could get away with it. Anderson In. has become very dry because most of all drugs came from crooked public officials. MOST of you that were involved bragged your drugs came from the crooked cops and the Ockomons, I believe you lost your bragging rights . It is time to rebuild this city and yes many job openings will be available soon. The INDIANA STATE POLICE WILL TAKE YOUR REPORTS ON INFORMATION YOU MAY HAVE REGARDING ALL CORRUPTION FROM THIS TOWN . LOCK EM UP....  ALL OF THEM. GOD HAS BLESSED ANDERSON INDIANA..      THANK YOU GOD     

Mon, 07/25/2011 - 12:02pm Permalink
Anonymous (not verified)

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

i would trade relegaliztion of drugs over illegal abortions in a heartbeat, drugs affects the rights of selfcontrol over ALL of our bodies, abortion just women.

Mon, 01/21/2008 - 4:59pm Permalink
Anonymous (not verified)

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I agree with you; the reinstatement of civil liberties and reinstatement of the US Constitution is THE most important issue on the table right now. I will not "sell out" my rights as an individual and US citizen in exchange for "going green," socialized medicine or any other perks one could throw in to silence me.

However, overthrowing Roe vs. Wade is just as bad. Taking a woman's right to choose is the EXACT SAME ISSUE as stripping YOU of YOUR right to choose what you put into (or take out of) your body. It is NO DIFFERENT and offensive on the very same level.

Luckily, Ron Paul leaves this up to "State's Rights." His plan is to allow the people enact the policies and elect the officials who will best represent them and their needs according to state instead of forcing a "one size fits all" federal policy on ALL people.

This is not ideal to me but it *is* acceptable for the time being. It CERTAINLY relinquishes more government power to the people.

Tue, 01/22/2008 - 11:26am Permalink
Anonymous (not verified)

Corrupt cops .There all over the country. In California this is common but there is little interest in investigating them . Its swept onder the rug or covered up.

Sun, 01/20/2008 - 4:36pm Permalink
Anonymous (not verified)

these "currupt cops" are criminals just like the criminal that are busted with large loads of drugs, they should of never been cops in the first place. in any profession their are always a few that don't belong, even the criminals have few that don't belong called "snitches" or informats, although i think they are worthy to cops for valuable info.

Mon, 01/21/2008 - 3:27am Permalink
Anonymous (not verified)

I am not too terribly surprised to see how uneducated most of the readers of this story are, as judged by their responses. Most seem to feel like they were picked on at some point by a cop. I wonder how many of them were guilty as charged, and are only upset because they were caught?

Cops sometimes do become crooks. I will not argue that at all. But, when you consider that they are usually judged more harshly, both in the courts and in public opinion, it seems to me that they are punished more than the normal person. What other profession or career is ended upon conviction? What other profession or career has the chance to financially ruin an entire family due to the stupidity of the wage-earner?

Vote Ron Paul and throw your vote away! We have no viable candidate, but he is the least qualified among the sorry group of losers we are offered

Mon, 01/21/2008 - 5:02pm Permalink
Anonymous (not verified)

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Why are you so willing to accept (and perpetuate) a two-party system in this country? I thought we were past this; don't you know that the power is in our hands?

So many people have bought the lie for so long that we have no power to enact change--that you'd BETTER vote for either a Democrat or a Republican--otherwise you're wasting your vote. The problem is: for as long as the people buy that lie is as long as there will be no other option. And the longer we remain in a two-party system, the longer those two parties work together to scratch each other's backs...Like the RIAA price-fixing scandal in 2001.

Dems and Reps will "oppose" each other publicly like mortal enemies, but at the end of the day, when the curtains are closed, they count the money on the same table together...that is, until there's a new sheriff in town.

To me, it is NOT a "wasted vote" to opt for another party. No, we may not get the "new guy" in office on the first try. Yes, it may take awhile to gather public confidence (or earn federal support) in moving towards a new trend, but every vote cast for someone in the "other" box is gaining ground. It's a vote "NO" for the two schoolyard bullies who run the place.

Choosing the nicer-looking bully to fleece you on the playground is still submitting to a bully.

Tue, 01/22/2008 - 11:41am Permalink
Anonymous (not verified)

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Let us not forget .... the president is merely a figurehead. There is no such thing as democracy in this country. But we can change that...if we all OPEN OUR EYES TOGETHER!!!!!!!

What ever happened to honesty?? Truth?? Let's get rid of all this corruption in the world...

The world is dripping with evil... let us fight the evil. Let's not be complacent anymore; let's question authority and revolt against corruption!!!

Tue, 01/29/2008 - 11:35pm Permalink
Anonymous (not verified)

Besides the fact to pronounce a War on your own country in the name of drugs. To take away your freedom of the right of choice. When you fight all through your youth to become an adult. Just to be treated like a child is not what growing up is all about. In all wars when you are captured by the enemy you are concidered a Prisoner of War (POW}. Since this is a War all people busted for drug offenses should be POW's not criminals. Let our none violent POW's go. After all the years that have gone by since the Marajuana proabition why are the people still stupid with lies of the federal government. All blame that is put on Bush and his regime is no different than any other Government that wants to rule the world. If you need to blame anyone's you best start at the top. Wth the Bilderberg Group. Stop being stupid America! Read your food labels, boycott the poisonous and mind control agents they are putting in your food products. Remember you are the voice of America.

Thu, 01/24/2008 - 1:29pm Permalink
Anonymous (not verified)

Changes to our current drug policies are not likely until the people making those arguements put down the bong long enough to piece together a moderately intelligible sentence. Sorry, but "normal" people think we sound like stoned children. Yelling "Fight the Power" is getting us nowhere.

Fri, 02/22/2008 - 4:04pm Permalink
Anonymous (not verified)

2008 PROPOSED BALLOT INITIATIVES
Contact Person / Organization Wisconsin Equal Justice/ Prison Reform Campaign
W 7942 Squires Rd
Ojibwa, Wisconsin 54862
(715) 266-3125

Status Proposed initiative to be on the November 2008 ballot.

Short Ballot Title Initiative Abolishing Wisconsin Judicial Commission, Limiting Judicial Immunity And Creating Commission To Review Complaints Of Judicial Misconduct And Providing Sanctions.

Long Ballot Title An initiative abolishing the Wisconsin Judicial Commission and limiting judicial immunity in most instances, creating a 15 member commission to review complaints of judicial misconduct and granting the commission the power and authority to impose sanctions and setting forth the duties of the commission; establishing criteria for commission membership and selection; establishing criteria for the location of commission offices; establishing compensation of commissioners; authorizing the commission to hire special prosecutors, advisors, investigators and staff; establishing procedures for criminal complaints; establishing statutes of limitations; and repealing SCR Chapter 60 of the Wisconsin Code of Conduct; creating True Accountability For All.

Section 2501. PREABLE AND PURPOSE. We, the People of the State of Wisconsin, find that the doctrine of judicial immunity has been greatly abused; that no effective remedy to redress judicial misconduct exists; that the right for the writ of habeas corpus in many cases is effectively suspended; that the Wisconsin Judicial commission has offered a less then one percent chance of remedy for judicial misconduct to the people of Wisconsin and many have, and continue to suffer from the results of a judiciary which is not held accountable, therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist in fact. We the People of Wisconsin, in whom all political power is inherent; and for whom government is instituted for our equal protection and benefit; and who have the right to alter, reform or abolish the same whenever we deem it necessary; as declared by United States Constitution; we therefore establish by Initiative the Act for our immediate protection and for the benefit of our posterity so as to insure judicial accountability.
Section 2502. AUTHORITIES. In accordance with the 1789 Constitution for the United States of America, including the 1791 Bill of Rights; and in accordance and harmony with the Declaration of Independence; We the People of Wisconsin hereby act to establish and insure judicial accountability with the provisions herein which shall be known hereafter as "The Wisconsin Judicial Accountability Act of 2008 A.D.," referred to hereafter as the "Act".
Section 2503. REPEAL OF ACT CREATING WISCONSIN JUDICIAL COMMISSSION. The Act creating the Wisconsin Judicial Commission, relating to removal, discipline and retirement of judicial officers, repealed in it's entirety, as a matter of right and necessity to abolish an entity of government which does not serve the people, nor provide for their equal protection or benefit. Further, all records held by the Wisconsin Judicial Commission, upon passage of the Act, shall be preserved and delivered to the custody of the Wisconsin Judicial Accountability Commission within thirty (30) days after it is seated; and thereafter said records shall be maintained by the Clerk of the Wisconsin Judicial Accountability Commission.
Section 2504. DECLARATION OF EMERGENCY. Judicial accountability being nearly nonexistent in the State of Wisconsin, which has subjected many citizens of Wisconsin to be deprived of life, liberty and property, without due process of law; and otherwise deprived of their Rights; therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist. The Act upon certification of its passage and approval by the voters and electors of Wisconsin shall immediately by in full force and effect.
Section 2505. DEFINITIONS. All words used herein the Act shall be read, considered and accorded value based upon Webster's Dictionary, 1828 Edition; or Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1914 Edition except as defined in the following subsections:
(a). "Wisconsin Judicial Accountability Commission" shall be the Wisconsin Judicial Accountability Commission created by the Act and referred to hereinafter as the WJAC.
(b). "Blocking" shall mean any act that impedes the lawful conclusion of a case, to include unreasonable delay or the willful rendering of a judgment or order that violates the Constitution for Wisconsin or the United States of America (1789), or denies due process of law to a party in a judicial or administrative hearing action; and
(c). "Judicial officer" shall include, but is not limited to any: Justice, Judge, Magistrate, Judge Pro Tem or Senior Judge; Prosecutor or Deputy Prosecutor; Commissioner, Administrative Hearing Officer, Administrative Law Judge; and/or any person acting in a judicial capacity, exercising judicial authority or claiming a shield of judicial immunity.
(d). "Commissioner" shall mean a member of the Wisconsin Judicial Accountability Commission;
(e). "Seat" shall mean a primary situs and/or facility where the Wisconsin Judicial Accountability Commission is located and conducts its hearings, administrative functions and other necessary business of the WJAC;
(f). "Strike" shall mean an adverse decision against a judicial officer, resulting: (1), from a civil proceeding in which the judicial officer has been found liable for act(s) or omission(s) while acting in a judicial capacity; or, (2) from a criminal conviction, including any plea bargain, no contest plea, deferred or withheld judgments of any offense committed while acting in a judicial capacity;
(g). "Business" shall mean any official business conducted by the WJAC;
(h). "Chair" shall mean the Chairman or Chairwoman of the WJAC;
(i). "Commissioner Pool" shall mean the pool of names of all available citizens whom have submitted their names to Secretary of State for the random drawing of Commissioner candidates .
(j). "Shall" means an obligatory command imparting a compulsory or mandatory performance and shall not be construed in a discretionary or permissive sense;
(k). "Person" primarily means any human being; and may include a corporation, partnership, trust or other artificial entity, if said artificial entity has the standing to act with or be acted upon by the WJAC;
(l). "Compulsion" shall mean any act which compels, orders or forces any person's performance of any act or omission;
(m). "Wisconsin Judicial Accountability Rules" shall mean Rules and Procedures promulgated by the Wisconsin Judicial Accountability Commission for the public administration of business before the WJAC and may be referred to as WJAR;
(n). "Good Behavior" shall mean the acts or omissions of a judicial officer which are not the behavior specifically mentioned in Sections of the Act as conduct which would deprive the judicial officer of immunity;
(o). "Investigator" shall mean an individual or individuals retained by the WJAC for the purpose of court watching, researching, interviewing of witnesses, or any other task or duty assigned to further the goals of the Wisconsin Judicial Accountability Act of 2008 A.D.
Section 2506. IMMUNITY PROTECTIONS AND LIMITATIONS. While justice requires the protection of judicial officers from frivolous and harassing actions, no immunity shielding a judicial officer shall extend to any willful, intentional or deliberate act(s) or omission(s) which at the time of their commission or omission: violated the Constitutions or laws of Wisconsin or the United States of America; perpetrated fraud or perjury; created a conspiracy to deprive any person of life, liberty or property; violated due process of law; denied or deprived discovery in a case; disregarded a material fact or law; denied or deprived access to counsel; was a judicial act exercised without jurisdiction; blocked the lawful conclusion of a case; tampered with a jury; or failed to disclose conflicts of interest.
Section 2507. WISCONSIN JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY COMMISSION. The Act hereby creates a fifteen (15) member Wisconsin Judicial Accountability Commission (WJAC) vested with statewide jurisdiction to judge the merits of both laws and facts. The WJAC shall exist pursuant to the Wisconsin Constitution, as an agency of the people of Wisconsin, independent of legislative, executive or judicial branches of government, for the purpose of holding the judicial branch accountable to the Constitutions and laws, who thereafter can hold the legislative and executive branches accountable. The WJAC shall be vested with the power and duty to receive, review and investigate, complaints of alleged judicial misconduct, and petitions for relief, and to determine on an objective standard:
(1) whether a civil suit against a judicial officer would be frivolous and harassing, or fall with the exclusions of immunity and/or;
(2) whether a finding of probable cause exists of any criminal conduct alleged against the accused judicial officer, or;
(3) whether a petition for relief has merit and should be granted. The WJAC shall determine all matters before it by a simple majority vote by recorded ballot with a quorum of at least 9 WJAC Commissioners.
Section 2508. JURISDICTION. With the passage of the Act, the WJAC shall have jurisdiction, power and authority to rule on complaints involving any judicial officer acting within the exterior boundaries of the State of Wisconsin, without exception.
Section 2509. GENERAL DUTIES OF WJAC. The WJAC is charged with the following general duties:
(a). Restoring the public's confidence in the judicial officers throughout the State of Wisconsin;
(b). Providing public grievance procedure and forum for issues of judicial misconduct, lack of good behavior and/or judicial abuse or malfeasance of office, as is defined herein or by other laws, rules or codes for Wisconsin, including, but not limited to the Wisconsin Code of Judicial Conduct and/or Professional Conduct and the Wisconsin Ethics in Government Act;
(c). Conducting regular meetings/hearings regarding complaints received against judicial officers or petitions for relief;
(d). Any other duty provided herein or subsequently established by rule or law which are in accordance to the goals of the Act.
Section 2510. QUALIFICATIONS OF COMMISSIONERS. An WJAC Commissioner shall be at least twenty-one (21) years of age, and shall have been a citizen of Wisconsin for at least one (1) year, and shall have lived primarily within the exterior boundaries of Wisconsin for at least one year prior to having his or her name drawn by lot. In the interest of justice and to prevent potential conflicts of interest, people not eligible for WJAC service shall extend to and include all current and prior elected or appointed public officials who have held a state office within the last ten (10) years; any past or present member of the Wisconsin State Bar; or current law enforcement personnel.
Section 2511. WJAC COMMISSIONER POOL. The WJAC Commissioners shall be drawn from the WJAC Commissioner Pool of names which shall be maintained by the Secretary of State's office for the first two years of it's operation, and thereafter by an independent, non-government entity to avoid conflicts of interest. Any man or woman meeting the qualifications of an WJAC Commissioner, and not prevented from serving by the limitations within Section 2509 of the Act, shall be eligible to submit their name to the WJAC Commissioner Pool for consideration to the WJAC Commission, and shall give notice of any change of address. Upon request, any man or woman shall have their name removed from the WJAC Commissioner Pool. The Secretary of State shall develop forms and procedures to administer and maintain the WJAC Commissioner Pool and shall provide a copy of same to the Clerk of the WJAC, along with a copy of the WJAC Commissioner Pool names, which shall be updated quarterly.
Section 2512. SERVICE OF COMMISSIONERS. There is hereby established a body of fifteen (15) Commissioner positions within the WJAC. Excluding the initial establishment of the WJAC, each Commissioner shall serve in his/her position for one year; shall serve only once in a lifetime; and thereafter be ineligible for further service, except as an advisor, consultant, investigator or other assistant. Yearly service to the WJAC shall be considered to be a full-time position as and when needed.
Section 2513. SELECTION OF COMMISSIONERS. WJAC Commissioners shall serve without compulsion and shall be drawn from the WJAC Commissioner Pool in a manner that is publicly witnessed. The Secretary of State shall draw additional names and follow notification and acceptance procedures mentioned hereafter, whenever any Commissioner selection process fails to fill all fifteen (15) WJAC Commissioner positions.
Section 2514. COMMISSIONER'S OATH OF OFFICE. Before any WJAC Commissioner is seated on the WJAC, he/she shall take the following oath of office, which shall be administered by the Clerk of the WJAC:
" I ___________________________ [name of Commissioner] do solemnly swear/affirm, that I will support the original Constitution for the United States of America, and the Wisconsin Constitution, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of an Wisconsin Judicial Accountability Commissioner, to promote justice and accountability for the judiciary to the best of my ability."
Two original written forms of this oath shall be signed by each Commissioner an filed with both the Clerk of the WJAC, who shall retain an original in the WJAC records and transmit the other original to the Secretary of State or other designated entity.
Section 2515. INITIAL SELECTION OF THE WJAC COMMISSIONERS. On the 15th day of November, 2008 A.D., at 12:00 noon, following the enactment of the Act, the Secretary of State shall, on the south steps of the Wisconsin State Capital building (which event may be televised), draw thirty (30) names of potential WJAC Commissioners, numbering each Commissioner candidate drawn in sequential order. Names shall be drawn from the WJAC Commissioner Pool of names. The Secretary of State shall contact every man or woman drawn by certified mail no later than forty-eight (48) hours after the names have been drawn, notifying each Commissioner candidate that his/her name has been drawn for WJAC service explaining the duties, term of service, compensation for WJAC service, along with a return form provided to accept WJAC duty. All WJAC Commissioners shall serve without compulsion. Potential WJAC Commissioners wishing to serve, shall return the form giving notice of their acceptance of the position of WJAC service to the Secretary of State's office, no later than the 30th day of November, 2008 A.D. On the 6th day of December, 2008 A.D., all returned acceptance notices shall be assembled and the fifteen WJAC Commissioner positions shall be filled by the Commissioner candidates who have returned their acceptance forms, based on the sequential order of the names drawn on the 15th day of November, 2008 A.D. Each WJAC Commissioner selected shall be assigned a WJAC Commissioner number from one to fifteen, based on the sequential order of the names drawn, for each of the fifteen (15) positions on the WJAC. WJAC Commissioner numbers shall reflect the rotation schedule for Commissioners leaving the WJAC. The Secretary of State shall immediately notify those WJAC Commissioners selected, that they have been selected to be seated on the WJAC.
Section 2516. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE WJAC. On the 7th day of December, 2008 A.D., the Secretary of State shall summon the selected WJAC Commissioners to convene on the 17th day of December, 2008 A.D., at a conference location in Stevens Point, Wisconsin, where the Secretary of State or his designated representative shall administer the oaths of office to the WJAC Commissioners. Said Commissioners shall then elect a chair from among themselves. The chair shall read the Act to the assembled WJAC members. Initial duties of the WJAC shall include: hiring a Clerk of the WJAC and other administrative staff as necessary; establishing a committee to select a seat for the operation of the WJAC; developing rules and internal operations procedures; and developing any positions deemed necessary for the effective operation of the WJAC.
Section 2517. SELECTION OF THE WJAC SEAT. The initial WJAC shall select a seat (location) for it's business and administrative operations and which shall be at least one mile from any court building, State Bar Association office or other facility where judicial hearings or business is regularly conducted. The WJAC 'seat' shall be established within 30 days of the initial selection of the WJAC and shall include a suitable administrative office, an official address and/or mailing location for correspondence and mailings, and office furnishings including office equipment and multi-line telephones for 3 administrative assistants and 1 clerk. The WJAC 'seat' shall be centrally located within or around Stevens Point, Wisconsin. The WJAC may travel to any location in Wisconsin to conduct hearings or other WJAC duties, and may utilize any facility deemed appropriate to conduct public hearings and/or other WJAC duties.
Section 2518. ROTATION OF COMMISSIONERS. On the first business day of each month, beginning in January, 2010 A.D., Commissioners shall be rotated off the WJAC, according to their Commissioner position number and under the following schedule: January, positions 1 and 2; February, positions 3 and 4; March, positions 5 and 6; April, position 7; May, position 8; June, position 9; July, position 10; August, position 11; September, position 12; October, position 13; November, position 14; and in December, position 15.
Any vacant Commissioner position(s) shall be filled at the next regular monthly rotation. Commissioners filling unscheduled vacancies shall complete only the remaining term of the Commissioner position being filled; however, if serving less then four (4) months, said Commissioner may submit his/her name to the Secretary of State for placement on the WJAC Commissioner Pool, and be eligible for further service. On the first business day of each month at 12:00 noon, beginning in November of 2013 A.D., on the south steps of the Wisconsin State Capital building, the Secretary of State shall draw names from the WJAC Commissioner Pool, in a number that is at least double the number of WJAC Commissioners which will be rotated off two (2) months following the drawing, plus double the number of any unscheduled vacancies on the WJAC. Each Commissioner candidate drawn shall be numbered in the order in which they were drawn. The Secretary of State shall contact the people drawn by certified mail not later than forty-eight (48) hours after the names have been drawn; notifying each Commissioner candidate that his/her name has been drawn for WJAC service; explaining the duties, term of service, compensation for WJAC service, and shall provide a return form to accept WJAC duty. Those people drawn who wish to serve, shall return the form giving notice of their acceptance of an WJAC Commissioner position to the Secretary of State's office, not later then the 20th day of the month (or the next business day thereafter) said name was drawn. On the 25th day of the month (or the next business day thereafter), all returned acceptance notices shall be assembled, and the WJAC Commissioner positions which will be rotated off in the second month following the month drawn, along with any vacancies, shall be selected, based on the sequential order of the names drawn on the 1st business day of the month. The Secretary of State shall then immediately notify those WJAC Commissioners selected, of their selection to be seated on the WJAC and notify them to appear for WJAC duties on the first business day of the following month.
The Secretary of State shall provide the Clerk of the WJAC a written notice of the names and personal contact information of each WJAC Commissioner selected.
Section 2519. COMMISSIONER'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST. WJAC Commissioners, having a conflict of interest regarding a party to an action before the WJAC shall notify the WJAC and recuse themselves from that case. Any WJAC Commissioner who fails to give notice of a conflict of interest regarding a party before the WJAC shall be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including removal from the WJAC, as will be further provided for in the WJAC Internal Operations Rules.
Section 2520. COMPENSATION OF COMMISSIONERS. WJAC Commissioners shall receive a monthly salary of three-thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) in money, plus other necessary and authorized per diem expenses whenever the WJAC conducts business away from its seat.
Section 2521. PROFESSIONAL ASSISTANCE. The WJAC is authorized to employ, retain and consult with advisors, special prosecutor(s) and investigator(s) as needed.
Section 2522. CLERK AND ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANTS. The WJAC shall employ a clerk of the WJAC and other clerical administrative assistants, as needed.
Section 2523. CLERK'S OATH OF OFFICE. Before the Clerk of the WJAC assumes office, he/she shall take the following oath of office which shall be administered by the chair of the WJAC:
" I, _______________________ [name of Clerk] do solemnly swear/affirm, that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the Clerk of the Wisconsin Judicial Accountability Commission, to promote justice and accountability for the people of Wisconsin, to the best of my ability."
Two original written forms of this oath shall be signed by the Clerk and filed with both the Clerk of the WJAC, who shall retain an original in the WJAC records and transmit the other original to the Secretary of State.
Section 2524. DUTIES OF CLERK. The Clerk of the WJAC shall have the following duties:
(a). Maintain all records and case files of the WJAC and provide access to copies of the same by any party or Citizen of Wisconsin requesting access to WJAC documents per the Judicial Accountability Rules; (b). Immediately assign a docket number to each complaint of judicial misconduct brought before it; (c). Administer the budget of the WJAC and account for all expenditures. The Clerk of the WJAC may delegate these duties to a WJAC financial administrator; (d). Publish a summary of the WJAC's findings and dispositions at least monthly. Timely post the same in the seat of the WJAC and make the summary available to those who request it for a reasonable fee; (e). Issue and/or product all documents necessary for the operation of the WJAC; (f). Any other duties that may hereafter be prescribed the Judicial Accountability Rules or other Rules governing the administration of the WJAC; (g). Maintain the official correspondence and communications for the WJAC; (h). Issue subpoenas and summons for WJAC cases; (i). Maintain a record of judicial officers who have received a "strike" or "strikes" against them, including the number and cause of said "strike(s);" (j). Any other needful act(s).
Section 2525. SELF-SUPPORTING FISCAL INTENT OF ACT. It is the intent of the Act to create a WJAC which, as much as is possible, shall be self supporting from fees, deductions from judicial officers salaries, fines and/or forfeitures.
Section 2526. JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY TRUST FUND AND FUNDS TRANSFER.
(a). There is hereby created a Judicial Accountability Trust Fund which shall be to provide the operating revenue for the budget of the WJAC. The Judicial Accountability Trust Fund shall be administered by the Office of the State Controller.
(b). On the 17th day of December, 2008 A.D., the State Controller shall make five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) of the Judicial Accountability Trust Fund available to the WJAC for the startup and establishment of the WJAC. Startup funds for the WJAC shall be delivered to and held by the chair of the WJAC until a Clerk of the WJAC has been hired. Thereafter, all WJAC funds shall be managed by the Clerk of the WJAC and shall be deposited in a Business and Operations account for the regular business and other costs associated with the establishment and operation of the WJAC.
(c). On January 3, 2009 A.D., and the 1st business day of each month thereafter, the State Controller shall deliver to the Clerk of the WJAC the sum of one-hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) and the Clerk of the WJAC shall transfer said funds into the Business and Operations account. Funds may be transferred by direct transfer.
(d). The WJAC Clerk shall account for all monies received by the WJAC from fees, fines and/or forfeitures and shall make monthly deliveries of the same to the State Controller for transfer into the Judicial Accountability Trust Fund.
Section 2527. DEDUCTIONS FROM JUDICIAL OFFICERS' SALARIES. Immediately upon passage of the Act, and any and all times thereafter, the State Controller shall cause to be deducted three percent (3%) from the gross salaries of all State of Wisconsin Supreme Court Justices, Appeals Court Judges, District Court Judges, Magistrates, Judges Pro Tem and Senior Judges who have not filed a Statement of Waiver to Claims of Immunity; said deductions shall be transferred immediately into the Judicial Accountability Trust Fund. Further, the State Controller shall instruct all county Treasurers and/or other fiscal agent(s) for each county who are responsible for payment of county Prosecutors salaries to deduct three percent (3%) from the gross salaries of all county Prosecutors and Deputy Prosecutors who have not filed a Statement of Waiver of Claims to Immunity, and to transmit said deductions to the State Controller who shall transfer said deductions into the Judicial Accountability Trust Fund. The WJAC Clerk shall keep a record of all judicial officers who have not filed a Statement of Waiver of Claims to Immunity and shall provide a copy of said record to the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Section 2528. WAIVER OF IMMUNITY. Judicial Officers may waive claims to immunity by signing and filing a Statement of Waiver of Claims to Immunity with the Clerk of the WJAC, and in which case no deduction shall be made from his/her salary. By filing the Statement of Waiver of Claims to Immunity, the judicial officer shall declare publicly that he/she agrees not to claim immunity in the even a civil or criminal complaint is filed against them. The Clerk of the WJAC shall keep a record of all judicial officers who have waived their immunity and shall transmit a copy of said waivers to the Clerk of the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Section 2529. FILING FEES. A filing fee of $50.00 shall be submitted with each complaint filed to the WJAC; or, a declaration in lieu of payment may be filed by a complainant who is indigent or objects to payment of such filing fee, stating their reason(s) for the same. Filing fees and other revenue collected shall be transferred monthly into the Judicial Accountability Trust Fund.
Section 2530. ANNUAL BUDGET – REVIEW. The WJAC shall have a beginning minimum annual operational budget of one million, eight hundred thousand dollars ($1,800,000), which shall be funded from the general fund in the first year of its operation and transferred into the Judicial Accountability Trust Fund immediately after passage of the Act. Six years after the passage of the Act, the legislature shall review the budget, revenues and cost of operations of the WJAC and may thereafter amend the minimum annual operational budget amount to an amount which reflects the actual operational costs incurred in the WJAC's fifth year of operation. A similar review and amendment shall occur every five years thereafter.
Section 2531. SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING DUTY – NOTICE TO LEGISLATURE. The State Controller shall notify the Legislature to replenish the Judicial Accountability Trust Fund whenever there is less than the annual operational budget amount in said Trust Fund. The Legislature shall provide any additional funding necessary for operational expenses of the WJAC.
Section 2532. RETURN OF EXCESS FUNDS. Should the Judicial Accountability Trust Fund in any subsequent year exceed the minimum annual operational budget amount at the beginning of a new budget year, the State Controller shall return the excess funds to the state general fund.
Section 2533. PROMULGATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF PROCEDURAL RULES. In the interest of justice and in preserving due process of law, the WJAC shall promulgate Wisconsin Judicial Accountability Rules (WJAR) which shall govern WJAC procedures for filing complaints and petitions; investigating, reviewing, considering and determining the merits of complaints or petitions; authorizing, issuing and/or serving subpoenas to compel the appearance of witnesses or documents as needed; transferring cases to trial court for further civil or criminal actions; reviewing, granting or denying of petitions for: temporary immunity from arrest, forfeiture or confiscation of property, deprivation of Rights of privileges, or habeas corpus. The WJAC shall also establish it's own internal operations and procedures rules. The Rules (WJAR) shall be simple, flexible, accommodating and in accordance with the provisions of the Act and its' intended purpose: to provide an opportunity for remedy to any person who believes they can prove they were wrongly harmed by judicial misconduct and to prevent further harm from occurring. Complaints shall sufficiently articulate the judicial officer's complained of act(s) or omission(s) and the remedies sought by the Complainant. The Wisconsin Judicial Accountability Rules shall be promulgated in similarity to the Wisconsin Administrative Procedures Act , and shall include investigative request/order procedure (alcohol/drug screen, etc.). Printed copies shall be made available to the public within 60 days of the Act. Copies shall continuously be available at no cost, at locations including but not limited to: the Office(s) of the WJAC; all county Courthouses; the Office of the Wisconsin Supreme Court; Wisconsin State law libraries; state prisons, county jails and other detainment facilities; all State Agency offices which conduct administrative hearings of contested cases; State of Wisconsin Offices of the Governor, the Secretary of State, the Attorney General; and the State Legislative Services office.
Section 2534. INTERNAL OPERATIONS OF THE WJAC. The WJAC shall establish Internal Operations Rules governing the internal administration of the WJAC, its employees and contractors. Such Internal Operations Rules may include, but not be limited to, the Code of Judicial Conduct; procedures for processing complaints, petitions and cases, provisions for internal discipline and the removal, recusal, death or resignation of WJAC Commissioners; and other operational matters as deemed necessary and/or appropriate.
Section 2535. COMPLAINT PROCEDURES. Any person may file a civil and/or criminal complaint with the WJAC alleging judicial misconduct, pursuant to the procedures and limitations of the Act and/or the Wisconsin Judicial Accountability Rules. The WJAC shall serve a copy of the filed complaint upon the complained of judicial officer and notice to the complainant of such service within five (5) days of receiving the complaint. A complaint served upon any judicial officer shall not on it's own act as a recusal/disqualification order and this may be sought separately, acted upon voluntarily by the judicial officer, or ordered by the WJAC as they deem appropriate and necessary to the complaint filed. A judicial officer shall have twenty days to serve and file an answer to the complaint. The complainant shall thereafter have fifteen days to file an optional reply to the judicial officer's answer. The WJAC shall determine the causes properly before it with its reasoned findings in a written decision within one hundred twenty (120) calendar days after the last complaint, answer or reply is filed, and serve upon all parties its decision to grant or deny immunity as a defense in any civil action that may thereafter be pursued against the judicial officer, and/or whether or not probable cause is found of criminal activity by any judicial officer, as alleged. Prosecution of any civil case, in which the WJAC's decision has denied a judicial officer an immunity defense, shall be the responsibility of the complainant, in any court of Wisconsin.
There shall be an additional three (3) days allowed for the mailing of any answer or reply. Upon timely request, the WJAC may provide for reasonable extensions of time, for good cause. Copies of all records and proceedings of the WJAC shall be available and open to the public. The WJAC shall have the power to subpoena and examine persons under oath and request further information from any party.
All complaint allegations shall be liberally construed in the favor of the complainant as a preliminary hearing to determine the merits of the case before the WJAC, which shall be further subject to being proven in a separate tribunal. A simple majority of the WJAC votes shall determine any matter. The WJAC shall be empowered to accept and submit stipulations in order to effect a timely, cost effective remedy in any matter at any time before the WJAC renders its final decision.
Section 2536. FRIVOLOUS OR HARASSING FILINGS. Any Complainant found by the WJAC to have filed a frivolous or harassing action against any judicial officers may be subject to an order or decision against the complainant by the WJAC which may include a fine up to one thousand dollars ($1,000). Any judicial officer who is exonerated by an WJAC investigation may request the complainant reimburse the judicial officer's expenses that were actually incurred in their defense, not to exceed one-thousand dollars ($1,000). This section shall not be a bar to any suit filed by a judicial officer against a complainant for harassment.
Section 2537. CORRECTIVE ACTION – REMOVAL – LOSS OF BENEFITS. The WJAC is hereby vested with power and authority to assess "strikes" against any judicial officer as defined in subsection 2505(f) of the Act. The WJAC shall issue an Order removing any judicial officer, immediately and permanently, from office, when said judicial officer has received three strikes against him/her. Whenever the WJAC becomes aware that a judicial officer has had an adverse civil or criminal decision against them, the WJAC shall review the decision to determine if it constitutes a "strike" and whether there have been three "strikes" against that judicial officer. "Strikes" shall be assessed by a simple majority vote of the WJAC.
Thereafter, that judicial officer shall be ineligible to serve/hold in any State judicial office, including that of pro tem or senior judge. Retirement benefits for any removed judicial officer shall not exceed one-half of the benefits that such person would have otherwise been entitled. One-half of any judicial officer's retirement benefits shall be forfeited to the Judicial Accountability Trust Fund, with an equal payment made to the Clerk of the WJAC not later then ten (10) business days after the judicial officer is sent a retirement benefit payment. Early retirement shall not avert a third-strike penalty. The WJAC shall provide reports of WJAC activity to the Office of the Governor and Supreme Court yearly to include the names of judicial officers whom have received one or more strikes against them. The Clerk of the WJAC shall maintain a record of judicial officers who have received a "strike" or "strikes" against them, including the number and cause of said "strike(s)." The WJAC shall notify the Office of the Governor and Supreme Court within five (5) days after any judicial officer has been ordered removed from office and may submit names of individuals the WJAC deems qualified to replace the removed judicial officer.
Section 2538. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT PROCEDURES. In addition to any other provision of the Act, a complaint for criminal conduct of a judicial officer may be brought directly to the WJAC upon all the following prerequisites: (1) a criminal complaint has been lodged with the appropriate prosecutorial entity or court, for the alleged misconduct; (2) the prosecutor declines to prosecute, or one hundred twenty (120) days has passed following the lodging of such complaint and prosecutions has not commenced; and (3) an indictment, if sought, has not been specifically declined on the merits by a regular Grand Jury.
Section 2539. CRIMINAL CAUSES. Should the WJAC find probable cause of criminal conduct on the part of any judicial officer against whom a complaint is docketed, it shall have the power to forward the complaint to a special trial court, except where double jeopardy protections apply. Further, the WJAC shall select a special prosecutor and a judge from a county other than that of the defendant judicial officer. The special trial court shall have the power to call special trial jurors to be empanelled from the county in which the offense occurred; or, if a change of venue is approved by the trial judge, jurors shall be empanelled from the county where the case is to be tried. The special trial jurors, plus alternates, shall be chosen, without peremptory challenges, and with voir dire limited to challenges for a personal relationship with any party in the case. Special trial jurors shall be selected from the same pool of jury candidates as any regular jury, and the trial jurors shall be instructed that they have power to judge both law and fact. Further, no person shall be compelled to serve as a special trial juror. Jurors shall be compensated pursuant to Wisconsin Code , plus any reasonable per diem costs and/or transportation costs. The special prosecutor shall prosecute the cause to a conclusion, having all the powers of any other prosecutor within this State. Upon conviction, the special trial jury shall have exclusive power of sentencing, limited to incarcerations, fines and/or community service. Each trial juror shall determine the sentence they would impose, but no sentence imposed by any special trial juror shall exceed the statutory maximum allowed for the crime(s) for which the judicial officer was convicted. The actual sentence imposed on the defendant judicial officer shall be derived by an average of the sentences imposed by each juror.
Section 2540. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. Except as provided in this section, complaints for judicial misconduct shall have six (6) years from the date of conclusion of the case in which the alleged judicial misconduct occurred, to file a complaint with the WJAC. No complaint shall be considered by the WJAC unless the complainant shall have first attempted to remedy the conduct complained of in the forum where it occurred. Should a complainant opt to proceed to a higher court, the six-month period shall begin to run upon disposition of the proceeding by that court. Attempts to remedy judicial misconduct shall include but not be limited to motions or petitions for relief, appeals and habeas corpus petitions.
In a six-year period, which shall begin to run immediately upon the initial seating of the WJAC, a complainant may file a complaint for judicial misconduct which occurred prior to the enactment of the Act, however, no complaint for judicial misconduct shall be brought for act(s) or omission(s) that were not illegal or contrary to the mandates of the Constitution(s) at the time they occurred.
A party filing a document in a court previous to the enactment of the Act, which states with particular reason(s) why they will not be seeking further relief and/or why they have no confidence in any further proceedings to obtain any just remedy, shall be deemed as an attempt to obtain remedy for the purposes of this section.
Within 180 days from receiving notice of the WJAC's final decision, a Complainant who filed a civil case with the WJAC must either begin or continue prosecution of his or her civil case. Failure to comply with these statutes of limitations, shall be grounds for dismissal of a case, unless: a petition is filed for an extension of time; and good cause is shown why the statute of limitations should be extended, and the WJAC, after consideration, votes to extend it.
Section 2541. PUBLIC INDEMNIFICATION. No judicial officer complained of, or sued civilly by a complainant pursuant to the Act shall be defended at public expense; or from any publicly funded indemnity or insurance fund; or by any elected or appointed public counsel in any proceeding before the WJAC; nor shall any judicial officer be reimbursed from public funds for any losses sustained under the Act.
Section 2542. JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE ACT. Every judicial officer after passage of the Act, shall provide a notice which shall appear at the end of every judicial 'Order, Decision, Judgment or Sentence', which clearly states that "any party who believes a judicial officer has committed an act of judicial misconduct may file a complaint pursuant to the Judicial Accountability Act of 2008 A.D.," Said notice shall also include the phone number and address of the WJAC office.
Section 2543. QUALIFIED IMMUNITY OF WJAC ACTIONS. Persons carrying out duties under this Act, and/or at the direction of the WJAC, shall receive immunity from all liability, civilly or criminally, nor be held in contempt by any court authority, except for intentional violations of clearly established law.
Section 2544. OTHER REDRESS. The provisions of the Act are in addition to other redress that may exist and are not mutually exclusive, except where double jeopardy protections apply.
Section 2545. TEMPORARY IMMUNITY. The WJAC shall be vested with power and authority, in the interest of justice, to grant or deny temporary immunity from arrest, prosecution, forfeiture or confiscation of property or the deprivation of Rights and/or privileges to any complainant or defendant, except in cases of: conviction for violent felony involving actual injury to another person; or a felony act of fraud, theft or property damage, exceeding three-thousand dollars ($3,000). Any complainant who files a complaint with the WJAC may petition for such relief. Temporary immunity may be granted to a complainant after the WJAC reviews the case and determines by simple majority vote that there is probable cause to believe the complainant's conviction, forfeiture, confiscation or deprivation of Rights or privileges resulted from judicial misconduct or abuse of authority as documented in complainant's complaint. Defendant judicial officers may also petition for and be granted such relief after the WJAC reviews the case and determines by simple majority vote that the complaint does not involve a violent felony involving actual injury to another person; or a felony act of fraud, theft or property damage, exceeding three-thousand dollars ($3,000) and substantial irreparable harm to the judicial officer would results if the relief were not granted. Such temporary immunity may be granted while the case before the WJAC is pending and during any subsequent civil or criminal case related directly thereto.
The WJAC is empowered to grant or deny temporary immunity from arrest to any fugitive who is scheduled to appear before the WJAC. Said immunity shall consist of a period of at least 24 hours prior to the scheduled appearance and ending not less then 24 hours upon conclusion of the WJAC hearing.
Section 2546. EXECUTION AND ENFORCEMENT. An Order for investigation compliance, discipline or removal from office concerning any judicial officer, duly executed by the WJAC and served, shall be enforced immediately and with the assistance of local law enforcement if necessary. The Sheriff of the county where said judicial officer presides, shall assign an officer to execute the Order, according to the specific terms therein, and which may include escorting the individual (judicial officer) from the court or other official property. Any judicial officer refusing the leave the property accordingly shall be promptly arrested for disturbing the peace and may be charged also with impersonating a judicial officer if deemed appropriate and under the terms of the order of the WJAC.
Section 2547. JURISDICTION TO CONSIDER FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. The WJAC shall have original jurisdiction, concurrent with the Wisconsin Supreme and District Courts, to consider petitions for writs of habeas corpus, and may grant and/or order relief under the provisions Wisconsin Habeas Corpus And Institutional Litigation Procedures Act).
Section 2548. CHALLENGES TO THE ACT. To prevent conflicts of interest with challenges to the Act, no judicial officer brought under the jurisdiction of the WJAC by a complaint filed therewith, shall have jurisdiction to sit in judgment of any challenge to the Act. Any adjudication, by a judicial officer who is a party to an action pending before the WJAC or a subsequent and pending civil or criminal proceeding authorized to proceed by the WJAC, which seeks to modify or annul any portion of the Act shall be null and void for all purposes and shall be considered grounds for bringing a complaint of a judicial act committed without jurisdiction, by any adversely affected party.
Section 2549. PREEMINENCE. Preeminence shall be given to the Act, as an Initiative of the people, in any case of conflict with Wisconsin statute, case law, or doctrine(s). Any Wisconsin law found inconsistent with or contrary to the Act shall be and is hereby deemed void, to the extent that said law is inconsistent with or contrary to the Act. The Act shall be subject to amendment or repeal only by an Initiative passed by the people of Wisconsin, except as otherwise provided herein.
Section 2550. SEVERANCE. Should any part of the Act be determined unconstitutional, the remainder shall remain in full force and effect as though no challenge thereto existed.
Jurors and Witnesses -- Fees and Mileage -- Application for Subpoenas. Witnesses before examining magistrates and in criminal cases in the probate and justice courts, and jurors and witnesses in a coroner's inquest, are entitled to ten dollars ($10.00) per day for each day actually engaged in the trial of a case, except that jurors who are serving on a civil or criminal case, which is proceeding pursuant to a decision of the Wisconsin Judicial Accountability Commission created under this chapter shall receive fifty dollars ($50.00) for each one-half (1/2) day, or portion thereof; or seventy dollars ($70.00) for each full-day (or more than ½ day) of required jury service ; any juror traveling more than thirty (30) miles from his residence shall be compensated an additional twenty-five (25) cents per mile, one way, which must be paid out of the county treasury; provided, however, that when the state or the defendant requires the attendance of more than three (3) witnesses in its or his behalf, before such witnesses shall be subpoenaed at the county expense, or their fees and mileages be a charge against the county, the county attorney or defendant must make affidavit setting forth that they are witnesses whose evidence is material for the state or the defense, and the facts showing such materiality, and that it or he can not safely go to trial without them. In such case or cases, the court or judge thereof, at the time the application is made therefor, shall order a subpoena to issue to such of said witnesses as the court or judge thereof may deem material for the state or defendant, and the costs incurred by the process, and the fees and mileage of such witnesses, shall be paid in the same manner that the costs and fees of other witnesses are paid.

Wed, 03/12/2008 - 3:23pm Permalink
Anonymous (not verified)

Known Corrupted Cops
Officer Bacigalupi #30878
Officer Sery #36878
All officers that worked or collaborated with Bacigalupi #30878.
Officer John Hughes #45063
However, I would bet there are so many more.

Tue, 01/27/2009 - 12:41am Permalink
Steven Lewis (not verified)

Jim Cashy and Brian Condon from the Nevada County Sheriff's Dept. Go to peoples homes that Bill Schaufler selects and illegally arrests them and while the people are in jail Bill Schaufler and his family breaks into the home of the person that was illegally arrested and steals all of their valuables, sells them and splits the money with the corrupt sheriff's. I have proof of this being done to me, but I can't get anyone to respond against the actions of the sheriff's and Bill Schaufler.

Sat, 08/15/2009 - 3:44pm Permalink
G-KAT (not verified)

Now I know not all Police are corrupt ! but try living in a town where 99.9 percent of the cops are corrupt. That town is FOUNTAIN COLORADO I have a few things to say to the Fountian P.D. before moving on you are ALL COWARDS and PA PBs and since you dont understand what PA PB means! I,ll tell you - you are ALL PUNK ASS - PUSSY BITCHS the only thing that makes you tough is your GUNS and BADGES and someday I hope soon the right GOVT people will find out and shut your DEPT down and let the El Paso county Sheriffs dept patrol that town. People wakeup ALL Police depts have video cams in there cars for there safety so they say! well I think everyone should ARM yourself,s with video cams for the same reasons that way if you get pulled over you can video tape the whole thing and keep you and your famley safe from the COPS and yes it is leagal to do this no matter what the cop may say if HE or SHE gives you a hard time about this or makes a harsh comment about this! then that means HE or SHE has something to hide.

Sat, 07/17/2010 - 6:15am Permalink
G-KAT (not verified)

Now I know not all Police are corrupt ! but try living in a town where 99.9 percent of the cops are corrupt. That town is FOUNTAIN COLORADO I have a few things to say to the Fountian P.D. before moving on you are ALL COWARDS and PA PBs and since you dont understand what PA PB means! I,ll tell you - you are ALL PUNK ASS - PUSSY BITCHS the only thing that makes you tough is your GUNS and BADGES and someday I hope soon the right GOVT people will find out and shut your DEPT down and let the El Paso county Sheriffs dept patrol that town. People wakeup ALL Police depts have video cams in there cars for there safety so they say! well I think everyone should ARM yourself,s with video cams for the same reasons that way if you get pulled over you can video tape the whole thing and keep you and your famley safe from the COPS and yes it is leagal to do this no matter what the cop may say if HE or SHE gives you a hard time about this or makes a harsh comment about this! then that means HE or SHE has something to hide.

Sat, 07/17/2010 - 6:16am Permalink
BILL PASSMORE (not verified)

ADD TRENT CHAMBERLINE  TO THE ALLEGED LIST OF COPS WHO ARE INVOLVED IN COMMITING CRIMES AGAINST CITIZENS. ALLEGED TO HAVE STOLEN AN ATV FOUR WHEELER AND DRUGS FROM ONE PERSON AND WATCHING FOR KNOWN DRUG DEALERS TO COME THRU TOWN WHERE OVER ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS WAS TAKEN FROM ANOTHER  DRUG DEALER AND DRUGS FROM THE SAME DEALER OTHER TIMES ........... THESE ARE TWO SEPERATE ALLEGATIONS FROM DIFFERENT PEOPLE ALSO  OTHER PEOPLE WHO KNOW HIM PERSONALLY BACK THE CLAIMS UP THAT HE IS AS CORRUPT AS THEY GET. FUNNY THESE CORRUPT COPS FIGHT WITH EACH OTHER  WHEN ONE ROBS SOMEONE IN ANOTHER COPS TERRITORY

Thu, 10/31/2013 - 12:58pm Permalink

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.