Feature: Vancouver Conference Sends a Message to the UN

Vancouver, British Columbia, was the scene this week of an international conference on drug policy, affiliated with the United Nations, that didn't turn out the way the UN imagined it. Organized as part of the UN's Beyond 2008 global forum to review the accomplishments and failures of the UN General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS) on drugs, the Vancouver conference sent the UN a strong message: end drug prohibition.

Attended by harm reductionists, treatment providers, prevention specialists, anti-prohibitionists and others from the US and Canada, the Vancouver forum differed greatly in tone and content from the other regional forums held so far as part of a process overseen by the Vienna NGO Committee on Narcotic Drugs, which works with the UN Office on Drugs and Crime and the Commission on Narcotic Drugs to incorporate the views of non-governmental organizations and civil society into the crafting of the next UNGASS drug strategy. In other regional forums, drug treatment and prevention forces dominated the conversation, as in the North American forum held last month in St. Petersburg, Florida, where groups like the Drug Free America Foundation held sway.

But in Vancouver, pioneer of the four-pillars policy (prevention, treatment, harm reduction, and law enforcement), home of the continent's only safe injection site, and ground zero for Canada's cannabis culture, it was a different story. Organizers there made sure it wasn't just another prohibitionist gathering.

"We wanted to make sure that we included absolutely everybody," said Gillian Maxwell of Keeping the Door Open: Dialogues on Drug Use, a Vancouver-based community coalition that cosponsored the forum. "In St. Petersburg, it was clear that drug reform and harm reduction people were not invited, which is a little odd. If you think about it, what do the UN treaties have to do with people involved in rolling out 12-step abstinence programs?"

Former Vancouver Mayor Philip Owen, architect of the four-pillars strategy, set the tone for the event early on. The "old-school prohibition" crowd had its say, said Owen, but now it's time for a new approach. "There are still those, in the US and in our federal government, who say drug users are criminals and should get a job, pay taxes and salute the flag," he said. But mayors, who see the problems first-hand, are calling for change, he said, pointing to the US Conference of Mayors declaration last June, where they "agreed unanimously the war on drugs is not working. Mayors are close to the issue so they actually see the drug users as people who are ill and need treatment, and they have to deal with related crime, yet it's our federal government that controls narcotics," Owen said.

"Drug-policy reform won the day because most rational people on the front lines realize that the war on drugs has been a miserable failure," Owen added. "The war on drugs is coming to an end, hopefully in my lifetime," he concluded.

Jack Cole, head of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP), told the nearly 100 delegates that drug addiction should be treated as a health problem, not a law enforcement one. "We have to at least get legalization and regulation of drugs on the agenda," he said, with one eye on Vienna, where the Commission on Narcotic Drugs will meet next month to review the past decade's progress in meeting the 1998 UNGASS goals.

It was clear that the forum had reached a general opinion, if not a complete consensus, said Maxwell. "It seems the majority of the people in the room think it's impossible to prevent drug use, and, therefore, you get the war on drugs, which is a war on people," Maxwell said.

In addition to LEAP's Cole, the US contingent included representatives of reform groups including Students for Sensible Drug Policy, Common Sense for Drug Policy, and Dale Gieringer, head of California NORML, who presented the national NORML statement to the forum. In that statement, NORML said that the UN's goal of "eliminating or substantially reducing" the global supply of marijuana had failed and that "the only practicable way to realize the UN's goal of eliminating the problems illicit cannabis supply and demand is to eliminate its illicit status."

If ending the drug war was the majority position, not everyone was won over. At least two participants complained to the Georgia Strait that the conference was unbalanced.

Alcohol-Drug Education Service's Judi Lalonde told the Straight there was too much harm reduction and not enough prevention at the conference. "Representation from the groups for legalization are probably about 95%, to possibly 5% in the area of prevention," Lalonde claimed. "I'm quite disappointed with the whole process of the last few days." She preferred the St. Petersburg forum, which "allowed for a real dialogue from a balanced perspective," while Vancouver's "became a forum for lobbyists and activists."

Brian Whiteford, the delegate for DARE BC at the conference, also complained of "disproportionate representation" of pro-legalization advocates. But Whiteford also added that the forum did a "good job" of bringing people together to exchange perspectives.

The criticisms about balance aren't fair, Maxwell protested. "We invited people from all sides of the spectrum," she said. "They just didn't all come. We invited many Canadian national groups, but many didn't even reply. Yes, we had a larger proportion of reformers and harm reductionists, but that's because they weren't even invited to the other North American forum in St. Petersburg."

Maxwell pronounced the forum a success. "It was very interesting, and I was so impressed by everybody -- they were all so articulate and respectful," she summarized. "I was so impressed by the intellect and the caring that people brought to this. This was a good moment for democracy and a good moment for civil society."

At least one local newspaper disagreed. The conference provoked an angry editorial from the Province, a Vancouver tabloid daily. "Drug legalization is not the solution it's cracked up to be," the Province warned. "The pro-drug lobby masquerades as a champion of individual liberties. But behind that disguise lurks the ugly face of societal decay."

As Mahatma Gandhi once famously noted: First they ignore you, then they attack you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. The path to ending global drug prohibition is long and twisting, but events like the one in Vancouver this week are laying the groundwork -- and nobody is laughing about it now.

Permission to Reprint: This article is licensed under a modified Creative Commons Attribution license.
Looking for the easiest way to join the anti-drug war movement? You've found it!

site comment

Off topic but necessary: Please eliminate the pop up that is part of opening this website. It is annoying, unnecessary and completely redundant: A table of contents is already provided. No one bothers reading the pop up, as well as reflecting ill on the site, giving it a sense of grasping hucksterism.

Thank you for your consideration,

Marcy Stephens
Rye, New York.

site comment

marcy - turn on your browser's pop-up blocker.

susan stephens
palo alto, california

Some Were Annoyed

[email protected] Vancouver,B.C. Canada I was able to attend day 2 of the conference thanks to an invitation provided by DRC.The Vancouver,Province newspaper was the author of the quoted comment and their columnist Joey Thompson wrote a really negative piece that was as if she hadn't attended. She didn't but that didn't slow down her prohibitionist zeal.Thompson writes from her desk and I have no idea if she does any research but in this case I can say for certain that she wrote in the dark.I tried to explain the reasons for the conference but she wasn't interested.Today,(FRI>FEB8,'08)she wrote another article about the lack of available treatment in the city. She feels that we don't care about the lack of treatment and only want to give drugs to everyone for free.My efforts to persuade her to the contrary have been seriously unappreciated.She hears what she wants to and is deaf to anything else.The Province editorial writers are of the same ilk and never miss a chance to throw shit in the face of anyone on the harm reduction train. For some reason they don't see that the drug war sucks all the cash away from all aspects of drug policy that would otherwise mitigate the damage.You can lead a horse etc. The UN rep was very positive and assured all that voices were being heard worldwide and that change was coming. Lets hope it's for the positive and that one day treatment and harm reduction will be the order and not the exception when funds to aleiviate suffering from drug dependance are allocated.I think we all want the same thing. There's just no consensus on how to get there.I can't understand how the prohibitionists think their way will ever work.They had 60 years where their lies kept drugs in the ghettos and out of middle class hands.No-one believes the lies anymore and there's so much confusion over what's true and what's just hysteria that things are continually getting worse.Pot must be made legal and education will handle the rest.The drug war has got to go.

Closed mindness and self vanglory of prohibition causes pain..

Aggressors for prohibition are fuelded by personal opinions and thier ideas that everyone should live like them.As with the failures and not to mention inhumain policie's of the slavery of the african race decade's ago..this policy of drug prohibition must go.It is a socitial enforcement of mind slavery on and against against those who suffer from addiction or those who use occaisonaly. To say that all people be created equal is just,but to say all people created equal as long as you live your life the same way that they do is not. The laws of the constitution have been steped on by politicians since it was first written for the benifit of their own personal agenda.Sure they may mean well but the nature of the human mind was not designed to be controlled by a few votes on a new bill..it was designed to think freely...only the pioneer of this drug war the United States Government continues to bully the weak and strike fear into the helpless by lies and manipulation into thinking that WE the people can not and should not be allowed to think for our selve's but allow the government(that is so full of incompetant leaders) vote on how we and the rest of the world should think and run our live's,our famlie's,our village's,our countrie's, and many other things aswell.

Not to mention this new reccession we are in? Doe's anyone stop to relise that when you have a sound economy running that people who everyday getting throwed behind bars and on costly probation that it play's a part in the unbalanced world of economic's? Just like with building a house made of toothpics..if you keep taking out toothpics because you and another few people voted on them not being what you wanted them to be so you take a few out but dont fix them..it is going to colapse with time and starin..
Well you keep taking people out of the familie's lives and putting them in and out of prisoan,jail and probation their famlie's will collapse..It ruin's their work record which makes hard to find a job-their familie's colapse..so do you think they are going to have money to spend in the economy if they cant find a good job and barely pay their bill's and put food on the table?Do you think they are going to be able to afford their children's education or keep the economy stablised if they are sitting in prison over a few marijuania plants?Or any drug for that matter. You keep taking tooth pics out of the workforce and shifting the table(economy and familie's) then the house of toothpic's(society and economy) WILL COLLAPSE!!!!
And it will take many years to rebuild it,if it can even be rebuilt..into a humain place to raise our kid's in like it was in 1782. People shouldn't use drug's...but I am not god-and neither are you to those who support this failed war on drugs.So give people back their rights!..give people back their freedom!..GIVE PEOPLE BACK THEIR FAMLY MEMBERS!>>THEIR JOBS!>>THEIR RIGHT TO LIVE!!THEIR WILL AND HOPE TO THINK FOR THEMSELVES!...And most importantly that of which is no one else's and sure not yours!...Their life..

Love and peace to all,even if I dont like ya- Kevin Johnson_Ft.Wayne,IN.
[email protected]

I agree completely

But may something happen before a time comes that WE are the one on the pyre.

We shall hang these petty criminals for their War Crimes and Crimes on Humanity all over earth. They are indeed treasonists and have been since 1933.

We must fight them and their followers, TO ARMS! We must WIN and take back our rights and our country!

http://www.nesara.us

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <blockquote> <p> <address> <pre> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <br> <b>

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Drug War Issues

Criminal JusticeAsset Forfeiture, Collateral Sanctions (College Aid, Drug Taxes, Housing, Welfare), Court Rulings, Drug Courts, Due Process, Felony Disenfranchisement, Incarceration, Policing (2011 Drug War Killings, 2012 Drug War Killings, 2013 Drug War Killings, 2014 Drug War Killings, 2015 Drug War Killings, 2016 Drug War Killings, 2017 Drug War Killings, Arrests, Eradication, Informants, Interdiction, Lowest Priority Policies, Police Corruption, Police Raids, Profiling, Search and Seizure, SWAT/Paramilitarization, Task Forces, Undercover Work), Probation or Parole, Prosecution, Reentry/Rehabilitation, Sentencing (Alternatives to Incarceration, Clemency and Pardon, Crack/Powder Cocaine Disparity, Death Penalty, Decriminalization, Defelonization, Drug Free Zones, Mandatory Minimums, Rockefeller Drug Laws, Sentencing Guidelines)CultureArt, Celebrities, Counter-Culture, Music, Poetry/Literature, Television, TheaterDrug UseParaphernalia, ViolenceIntersecting IssuesCollateral Sanctions (College Aid, Drug Taxes, Housing, Welfare), Violence, Border, Budgets/Taxes/Economics, Business, Civil Rights, Driving, Economics, Education (College Aid), Employment, Environment, Families, Free Speech, Gun Policy, Human Rights, Immigration, Militarization, Money Laundering, Pregnancy, Privacy (Search and Seizure, Drug Testing), Race, Religion, Science, Sports, Women's IssuesMarijuana PolicyGateway Theory, Hemp, Marijuana -- Personal Use, Marijuana Industry, Medical MarijuanaMedicineMedical Marijuana, Science of Drugs, Under-treatment of PainPublic HealthAddiction, Addiction Treatment (Science of Drugs), Drug Education, Drug Prevention, Drug-Related AIDS/HIV or Hepatitis C, Harm Reduction (Methadone & Other Opiate Maintenance, Needle Exchange, Overdose Prevention, Pill Testing, Safer Injection Sites)Source and Transit CountriesAndean Drug War, Coca, Hashish, Mexican Drug War, Opium ProductionSpecific DrugsAlcohol, Ayahuasca, Cocaine (Crack Cocaine), Ecstasy, Heroin, Ibogaine, ketamine, Khat, Kratom, Marijuana (Gateway Theory, Marijuana -- Personal Use, Medical Marijuana, Hashish), Methamphetamine, New Synthetic Drugs (Synthetic Cannabinoids, Synthetic Stimulants), Nicotine, Prescription Opiates (Fentanyl, Oxycontin), Psilocybin / Magic Mushrooms, Psychedelics (LSD, Mescaline, Peyote, Salvia Divinorum)YouthGrade School, Post-Secondary School, Raves, Secondary School