Among the features available on DRCNet's new web site are interactive possibilities for you to be a part of the web team. First and foremost are Reader Blogs, a section of the new "Stop the Drug War Speakeasy" blogosphere project. Visit http://stopthedrugwar.org/speakeasy/reader to check it out and start posting! (If you tried already and had trouble, please try again -- we have worked out some of the initial technical issues, though probably not yet all.) We will be devoting an increasing amount of attention over time to the Reader Blogs -- this is just the beginning!
You can now let us know about important or interesting news items of relevance by submitting them directly to our new Latest News section -- visit http://stopthedrugwar.org/node/add/content-recent_news to send your suggested news links to our moderators.
DRCNet continues to publish listings of events large and small that relate to the cause, but now we feature them in a listing that appears on most of the pages on our site and which links to a full calendar. If you are involved with or know of a relevant event, you can post it directly -- not just a short description as we have done previously, but the full announcement -- at our add event page at http://stopthedrugwar.org/node/add/event online.
Drug War Chronicle articles now have comments sections at the bottom of them, another way you can join in the discussion.
Coming soon: syndication feeds you can post on your web site, a substantial drug policy links database, and geographically-targeted content for your personalized web site view. To get that geographically-targeted content, though, you'll need to be logged to our new user accounts (same e-mail address you gave us previously, if you're a subscriber) and provide us with your location if you haven't already. Visit http://stopthedrugwar.org/user to log in or register or update your information. (Please let us know if you experience any error messages or problems with the user accounts -- we have gotten some of the issues fixed but we want to get it as close to perfect as we can.)
Comments
ANTHILL PSYCHOLOGY vs. EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY
There's a lot of psychiatric meds being sold these days, in case you hadn't noticed. And there's a lot of cui bono questions around all those prescriptions.
Cui bonoâwho benefits? There's all kinds of evidence showing that drug companies make massive profits from psychiatric medications, even while unbiased clinical tests show that many of them are of little or no benefit to most people. There's a whole mental health industry that needs chronic nut cases in order to keep its stockholders and salaried employees happy. There's research that's sent normal people with fake symptoms into that system and discovered that it's very difficult for people to get out of the mental health system once they're in it, no matter how normal they are.
But that's not what I want to talk about right now. I want to talk about the assumptions behind our current mental health system, assumptions prior to even the profit motive: what is the mental health profession trying to accomplish? What is their basic vision? What are the results of that basic vision? Are their other possible âmission statementsâ for a mental health movement, that might produce very different results from those we are dealing with due to the current model?
I would submit that most members of the psychological/psychiatric world see their mission as âhelping people fit in to society.â That's why so many children are on ritalin, and why so many adults are on everything from anti-anxiety medications to anti-psychotics. Society needs to function smoothly, and it is up to individuals to adjust to society by any means available.
Is something wrong with this picture? No, from the mainstream perspective. Early psychologists had a revolutionary, we-can-change-the-world attitude, but since Freud wrote âCivilization and its Discontentsâ the mainstream has seen its task as helping people adjust to an imperfect world. Well, hey, it is an imperfect world and we need to get used to it, but not THAT used to it. The world-as-it-is is not some absolute that we cannot change. We are not ants in an anthill, but mainstream psychology tends to see society in that way, and treat individuals accordingly.
In the 1950's, some psychologists, chief among them Abraham Maslow, made the observation that, once basic human needs of food, shelter, and emotional security are met, a different set of priorities kicks inâa need for what Maslow called âself-actualization.â
Dr. C. George Boree summarized Maslow's idea in the following words:
â(Self-actualized people are)â reality-centered, which means they (can) differentiate what is fake and dishonest from what is real and genuine. They (are) problem-centered, meaning they (treat) lifeâs difficulties as problems demanding solutions, not as personal troubles to be railed at or surrendered to. And they (have) a different perception of means and ends. They (feel) that the ends donât necessarily justify the means, that the means could be ends themselves, and that the means -- the journey â (is) often more important than the ends.
â(Self-actualizers) also (have) a different way of relating to others. First, they (enjoy) solitude, and (are) comfortable being alone. And they (enjoy) deeper personal relations with a few close friends and family members, rather than more shallow relationships with many people.
âThey (enjoy) autonomy, a relative independence from physical and social needs. And they (resist) enculturation, that is, they (are) not susceptible to social pressure to be "well adjusted" or to "fit in" -- they (are), in fact, nonconformists in the best sense. â
(note to readersâI changed the tense of these sentences from past to present)
"Reality-centered," eh? Well, we all know about where the reality-based community is at, don't we?
Right down the list, Maslow's vision of higher consciousness clashes with anthill psychology's need for smoothly fitting cogs in the societal mill.
Paying attention to the difference between what is fake and what is genuine? No, no, don't you dare pay any attention to the man behind the curtain.
Treating life's difficulties as problems to be overcome rather than caved in to? You're asking people to make waves, dude.
The journey is more important than the goal? What are you, some kind of hippie?
You enjoy solitude? Without even a TV or radio on? That's scarey! I wouldn't wanna hafta listen to what's goin' on in my head! Keep me distracted, please!
Deep personal relations with a few friends? You're askin' to get hurt, buddy.
Independence from physical and social needs? How ya gonna be a good consumer? I mean, isn't life about buying things and showing off your ability to buy them?
Maslow's line of thinking was not picked up by university psychology departmentsâthere was no drug research money in it--and now his âthird stream psychologyâ is the province of a dying breed of twinkly old men and women who still work wonders for the lucky few who find them. They send their patients out with solutions, not prescriptions. All the drugs that facilitated third stream psychologyâMDMA, psilocybin, LSD and similar mind-manifesters, have been expressly forbidden by the US government, with greater penalties attached to their use and distribution than for many violent crimes. Can't be disrupting the anthill, now.
It's not just about wanting to feed the drug companies. The third streamâcall it evolutionary psychologyâhas been purged from America's consciousness because it is evolutionary, and sometimes messy. Beings who are on their way beyond being ants do not fit into ant colony life very well. Having it be OK to get a little crazy at times (an essential part of the evolutionary process) is not conducive to orderly life in the anthill.
But anthill psychology assumes a steady-state society, and that is where it falls down. We are running out of the resources that have fueled our current trajectory, and need to change course so we don't hit the climate change/peak oil wall that is looming up fast. We need to evolve past being ants. So don't reach for that pill bottle, folks. If you haven't changed your mind lately, are you sure you still have one?
music Greg Brown, "One Cool Remove"
In reply to ANTHILL PSYCHOLOGY vs. EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY by Anonymous (not verified)
didn't realize this was going to come out as "anonymous"
it's from my blog, "Deep Green Perspective," which you can find at http://brothermartin.blogsource.com/
keep the faith
martin hÂ
In reply to didn't realize this was going to come out as "anonymous" by Anonymous (not verified)
not being anonymous
Martin and other friends:
To post with your name or user ID, please use our login page.
Let us know if you experience any bugs or anything confusing. We are still doing fine-tuning of this function.
Also consider making substantive posts like this to Reader Blogs -- more people will read your work that way!Â
David Borden, Executive Director
StoptheDrugWar.org: the Drug Reform Coordination Network
Washington, DC
http://stopthedrugwar.org
webdesigningcompny.net
Its a web desiging company. It deals in web site design, website redesign, flash, 3D animation, logos, Banner Adds etc
Add new comment