Canadian Hemp Company Files NAFTA Action Against US DEA 1/18/02

Drug War Chronicle, recent top items

more...

recent blog posts "In the Trenches" activist feed

SUBSCRIBE TODAY!!!

In an act of political jujitsu, Canada's largest hemp seed producer is taking advantage of a little-used provision of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to sue the US government over the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) proposed administrative rule that would ban hemp foods containing traces of THC after February 6.

On Monday, Kenex Ltd. of Chatham, Ontario, filed a $20 million-plus lawsuit charging that the impending ban would destroy its rapidly growing business in the US. Kenex also argued that US government efforts had already caused the company to forego introduction of one new product line last year and that it was losing US customers because of uncertainty over its ability to import already contracted shipments.

Under NAFTA rules, member countries must treat companies from other member countries equitably and through a legitimate regulatory process. The Kenex filing, a copy of which was obtained by DRCNet, accuses the DEA and the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP, the drug czar's office) of "harassment of the legal and legitimate trade" in industrial hemp and attempting to "effectively amend" existing law through the regulatory process.

As the Kenex filing notes, the well-settled US federal statutory definition of marijuana excludes "the mature stalks of such plant, fiber produced from such stalks, oil or cake made from the seed of such plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such mature stalks (except the resin extracted therefrom), fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of such plant which is incapable of germination."

In other words, hemp, hemp seed, and hemp oil are not marijuana under US law. But Kenex argues that that the DEA and ONDCP, through DEA's rule-making procedure, are attempting to treat the trace amounts of THC in hemp as a controlled substance and have thus created "a de facto ban on the hemp food products produced, marketed, and distributed, by the investor and its investment in the United States."

"There are two principles at question here," said Kenex attorney Todd Weiler. "NAFTA spells out that member countries must treat companies fairly and equitably, and it also demands that under its 'national treatment' and Most Favored Nation provisions that companies in member countries be treated the same as their competitors in other member countries," he told DRCNet. "But it really comes down to fairness, that's what this case is all about."

Weiler cited the importation of poppy seeds, which contain trace elements of opiates, but which are allowed under US law. "Poppy seed producers make a product that competes with hemp seed," said Weiler, "but the DEA is not embargoing poppy seed bagels. They are not treating hemp seed producers like poppy seed producers."

The NAFTA expert expressed confidence that Kenex would prevail in its suit, but told DRCNet the aim was not so much monetary damages as forcing US authorities to come up with a reasonable policy. "The idea is to get them to come to their senses and adopt a reasonable policy, such as those of the Canadians, the Europeans, and the Australians," he said.

The Kenex lawsuit runs parallel to Canadian government concerns about US hemp rules. Canadian trade officials recently sent a letter to the DEA warning that the proposed ban would hurt a legitimate, regulated Canadian industry, the Toronto Globe and Mail reported on Monday. The letter also noted that the ban would violate World Trade Organization rules requiring countries to run risk-assessment tests before banning products.

"The Canadian government is on our side," said Weiler, adding that he was referring to general concerns about the DEA's hemp rules, not the Kenex case in particular. "The Ministry of Foreign Affairs heard about the hemp rulemaking and wrote to DEA asking to see on what basis they were making the changes. Under NAFTA, the DEA must give this stuff to the Canadian government," said Weiler. "But they must not have an international attorney. DEA wrote back tersely, saying the information was confidential."

The Canadian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Trade had not returned DRCNet calls for comment by press time.

The NAFTA challenge to DEA's hemp food ban through administrative fiat is only the latest front in this increasingly noticed battle. Last week, the Hemp Industries Association and seven hemp food producers, including Kenex, sued in federal court in San Francisco to block the ban on hemp food containing traces of THC (http://www.drcnet.org/wol/219.html#hempsuit). HIA is also awaiting a ruling on a temporary injunction blocking DEA from implementing the rule changes. And VoteHemp (http://www.votehemp.com), an advocacy group linked to the industry, along with Students for Sensible Drug Policy and the Mintwood Media Collective, put public pressure on the agency with a 74-city hemp food taste-test protest last month.

All of the pressure is starting to pay off, at least in terms of media attention. The story made big-time last Sunday, with a reasonably accurate and balanced front-page story on Sunday, January 13, followed by the Wall Street Journal and the Los Angeles Times on Tuesday.

-- END --
Link to Drug War Facts
Please make a generous donation to support Drug War Chronicle in 2007!          

PERMISSION to reprint or redistribute any or all of the contents of Drug War Chronicle (formerly The Week Online with DRCNet is hereby granted. We ask that any use of these materials include proper credit and, where appropriate, a link to one or more of our web sites. If your publication customarily pays for publication, DRCNet requests checks payable to the organization. If your publication does not pay for materials, you are free to use the materials gratis. In all cases, we request notification for our records, including physical copies where material has appeared in print. Contact: StoptheDrugWar.org: the Drug Reform Coordination Network, P.O. Box 18402, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 293-8340 (voice), (202) 293-8344 (fax), e-mail [email protected]. Thank you.

Articles of a purely educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of the DRCNet Foundation, unless otherwise noted.

Issue #220, 1/18/02 Editorial: Poisonous Fruits | Canadian Hemp Company Files NAFTA Action Against US DEA | HEA Drug Provision Repeal Moves Forward on Second Front | Souder Zinged in Roll Call Piece, Accused of Ducking Debate With HEA Drug Provision Foes | DRCNet Interview: Colorado Sheriff Bill Masters | Andean Update: On Again Off Again Peace Talks in Colombia on Again, Bolivian Army Kills Two in Coca Market Raid | California Senate Kills Ecstasy Bill, Assembly Bill Loses Mandatory Minimum Provision | New Jersey Racial Profiling Case Reaches Conclusion, Police Officials, Politicians Left Untouched | Jailed Swiss Cannabis Activist in Ninth Week of Hunger Strike | Not So Fast on Reform Legislation in Brazil | National Guard Drug War Budgets Cut This Year, Congressional Hawks Plead for More | Job Listings: Bay Area Needle Exchange Research, DC Libertarian Party | Alerts: HEA Drug Provision, Bolivia, DEA Hemp Ban, Ecstasy, Mandatory Minimums, Medical Marijuana | The Reformer's Calendar
Mail this article to a friend
Send us feedback on this article
This issue -- main page
This issue -- single-file printer version
Drug War Chronicle -- main page
Chronicle archives
Subscribe now!
Out from the Shadows HEA Drug Provision Drug War Chronicle Perry Fund DRCNet en Espa�ol Speakeasy Blogs About Us Home
Why Legalization? NJ Racial Profiling Archive Subscribe Donate DRCNet em Portugu�s Latest News Drug Library Search
special friends links: SSDP - Flex Your Rights - IAL - Drug War Facts

StoptheDrugWar.org: the Drug Reform Coordination Network (DRCNet)
1623 Connecticut Ave., NW, 3rd Floor, Washington DC 20009 Phone (202) 293-8340 Fax (202) 293-8344 [email protected]