Republican Gov. Gary Johnson's comprehensive drug reform package is advancing
by fits and starts as the legislative clock ticks down in New Mexico.
Seven bills calling for decriminalization of less than an ounce of marijuana,
medical marijuana, sentencing and asset forfeiture reform, syringe accessibility,
and limited liability for those who administer anti-opioid drugs to overdose
victims have been introduced, but the package is unlikely to survive intact.-- END --
It now appears that not all parts of the package will pass, with the marijuana
decrim bill most in danger, and the governor's sentencing reforms may be
endangered by his libertarian reluctance to spend money for drug treatment
Democrats had repeatedly warned the governor that he must put up the cash
for treatment if he wanted to see his package have a chance of passing.
Last month, Sen. Manny Aragon (D-Albuquerque) took to the Senate floor to
tell Johnson to "put your money where your mouth is" and be "intellectually
honest about a monetary figure on what it costs to treat heroin addicts."
Johnson did offer a $9.8 million appropriation for treatment, and that was
good enough for Aragon, who cosponsored it along with more than a dozen other
Democrats in both legislative houses. But last week, Sen. Cisco McSorley
(D-Albuquerque), one of the package's key supporters, informed Johnson that
he would not sponsor the legislation, saying the funding level was inadequate.
"I cannot sponsor your bill," McSorley wrote to the governor. "Your
bill ensures the death of drug reform this year."
McSorley argued that the state should spend at least $40 million for treatment
and prevention programs, and he was notably unimpressed by the fact, pointed
out by Johnson, that his bill represented a 30% over previous funding levels.
"It doesn't matter if your numbers are a 33% increase; $9.8 million is just
too small," McSorley wrote. "It is inadequate because it is not recurring
and it is not built into the budget base."
McSorley isn't alone. House Speaker Ben Lujan (D-Santa Fe), and Senate
President Pro Tem Richard Romero (D-Albuquerque), told the Albuquerque Journal
the governor's proposal was not enough.
"If we're really serious about addressing the problem of drugs in New Mexico,
we need to step forward and show that we really support the prospect of treatment
and prevention by providing sufficient dollars to take care of it," Lujan
said. "Cisco and I have been talking, and certainly we felt that $40
million would be something that would address those needs that are out there."
Romero told the Journal he did not know what the appropriate funding level
was, but that he was going with his political ally. McSorley and one
other Democrat had joined with all 18 Senate Republicans to oust Aragon from
the President Pro Tem position earlier this session.
"I have to trust people like Cisco," he explained.
Supporters of the package remain cautiously optimistic, however. Former
Democratic Gov. Tony Anaya, who is lobbying Democrats in the legislature
and being paid by the Lindesmith Center-Drug Policy Foundation, saw the move
as just politics.
"This a political environment, and things ultimately get worked out," Anaya
told the Journal. "The biggest issue that I've run into on the treatment
is the funding source... That's just an issue the legislators and the governor
may have to try to work out."
Anaya's Republican lobbying companion, Mickey Barnett, was soothing.
"I'm just hopeful that when it finally comes time to vote that everybody
will just vote their conscience," Barnett said. "And I think Cisco's
for the bills, so I hope that when he actually votes, he won't vote no just
because he doesn't agree on the funding bill."
David Goldstein, a research associate with Lindesmith's New Mexico office,
told DRCNet he thought McSorley was just playing position politics.
"The governor might be open to raising the funding appropriation for treatment,"
said Goldstein, "but the $40 million is just not feasible. Even the
Democrats who genuinely want treatment wouldn't allocate that much money."
"It could be nothing more than bargaining," Goldstein said. "I don't
think it will sabotage the bill, it's just politics."
Meanwhile, the governor's medical marijuana bill is sailing along despite
still unresolved questions about how patients are supposed to obtain the
stuff. Identical bills in the House and Senate easily won approval
in their respective public affairs committees and now face votes in the judiciary
The bill was publicly backed by the American Civil Liberties Union, the New
Mexico Medical Society, the state Department of Public Safety and the governor's
taskforce. Lawmakers also heard powerful personal testimonials for
patients whose lives have been eased by medical marijuana. "In my judgement,
this is not a law enforcement issue before you today," Department of Public
Safety Secretary Nicholas Baker told the committees.
The marijuana decriminalization push is not faring nearly as well.
Gov. Johnson's legislative liason, Dave Miller, told the Santa Fe New Mexican
last week that decrim was "dead in the water," before later amending his
remarks to say, "The fight goes on. Decriminalization is alive, though
it may not be well."
The set of sentencing reform measures also appeared headed for a tough fight.
"Sentencing reforms are very controversial," Lindesmith's Goldstein told
DRCNet. "It's hard to say which will pass."
Goldstein and the lobbyists are optimistic about medical marijuana, asset
forfeiture reform (which has already won committee approval), and the bill
allowing pharmacists to sell clean needles to drug users. They also
expect the anti-opioid overdose measure to pass.
Things will have to happen fast if they happen at all; the session ends next
month. However things come out in the legislature, though, the Lindesmith
Center will be maintaining a presence.
"We're not going anywhere just yet," Goldstein told DRCNet. "We'll
be dealing with implementing the bills that do get passed."
(The governor's package is available online at http://governor.state.nm.us/drug_policy/reform_proposal.htm
-- and see http://www.drcnet.org/wol/170.html#strangedays
for earlier DRCNet coverage of the New Mexico effort.)
Issue #174, 2/23/01
New Report Rakes Clinton on Imprisonment | The Coca-Go-Round: Peruvian Production Starts to Increase as Spraying Destroys Colombian Fields | Washington State Hardliners Pitch Kindler, Gentler Drug War in Bid to Preempt Deeper Reforms | New Mexico: Update on Gov. Johnson's Drug Reform Package | Feds vs. Bongs: Heads Up for Head Shops | Newsbrief: American Pilots in Firefight With Colombian Rebels | Marijuana Has Less Adverse Effect on Driving Than Alcohol, Tiredness, UK Study Says | Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative Legal Briefs Online | An Invitation to Help Repeal the Rockefeller Drug Laws | | Erratum: Three Strikes Clarification | The Reformer's Calendar | Editorial: The Peace Process
Mail this article to a friend
Send us feedback on this article
This issue -- main page
This issue -- single-file printer version
Drug War Chronicle -- main page
PERMISSION to reprint or
redistribute any or all of the contents of Drug War Chronicle (formerly The Week Online with DRCNet is hereby
granted. We ask that any use of these materials include proper credit and,
where appropriate, a link to one or more of our web sites. If your
publication customarily pays for publication, DRCNet requests checks
payable to the organization. If your publication does not pay for
materials, you are free to use the materials gratis. In all cases, we
request notification for our records, including physical copies where
material has appeared in print. Contact: StoptheDrugWar.org: the Drug Reform Coordination Network,
P.O. Box 18402, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 293-8340 (voice), (202)
293-8344 (fax), e-mail [email protected]. Thank
Articles of a purely
educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of the DRCNet
Foundation, unless otherwise noted.