2/23/01
Adam Engleby thought everything was cool. Yes, his shop, Hemp Cat in
Iowa City, sold, ahem, "smoking accessories," or bongs, pipes, and rolling
papers, but the Iowa City Police Department visited regularly, and they never
had any problem with Hemp Cat's back room. Heck, Engleby even had signs
in his store advertising the accessories as being for use with tobacco, he
wouldn't allow any talk about drugs in the shop, and he certainly didn't
allow minors into the back room. And after all, Iowa City is a progressive,
tolerant college town, and local police reflected the relaxed attitude.
The Iowa City Police Department's Sgt. Brotherton said as much to DRCNet.
"We don't see [the Hemp Cat] as a major problem," he said. "We weren't
paying much attention."
But what was an acceptable arrangement for the community wasn't good enough
for the feds. On February 11th, Engleby's home and business were raided
by teams of civilian-dressed law officers, headed by the Drug Enforcement
Administration.
"The DEA led the raids," Engelby told DRCNet. "The only badge I was
shown was a DEA badge. They had warrants for "drug paraphernalia" and
any sort of records, and they took everything. They took our rolling
papers, they took real tobacco pipes, and, of course, they seized all of
our computers -- four of them, two at the store and two at home. They
even took my wife's computer."
"The Iowa City PD never hassled us in six years of business," groaned Engleby,
"and no one ever came in and told us to stop, no one complained."
No one was arrested, Engleby said, and no charges have been filed, but Engleby
has now joined a growing number of "alternative store" (the industry cringes
at the term "head shop") owners and operators being rudely awakened to the
reality of federal drug paraphernalia laws.
Unlike many state and local paraphernalia statutes, which allow for a subjective,
contextual interpretation of whether a given object is indeed drug paraphernalia
-- sometimes a spoon is only a spoon -- federal law is black and white:
Possession of a bong is a federal offense, and so, of course, is sale or
manufacture of a bong, or conspiracy to do so. It can get you three
years in federal prison. And it doesn't matter if the bong has never
been used or if it is a jewel-encrusted work of art; a bong is a crime.
And to make things even rosier, since 1990 federal law has made drug paraphernalia
violators subject to Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO)
and money laundering charges, as well.
"It's simple," head shop defense attorney Robert Vaughan, the long-time publisher
of an industry newsletter, told DRCNet. "If you have a bong, you're
violating federal law. You can get a license to own a tommy gun, but
you can't get one to own a bong."
"Stores that have bongs are screwed," the Nashville-based lawyer said.
"They can't win. The Supreme Court upheld its so-called objective standard
in US vs. Pipes and Things in 1994, and now categories of items are per se
illegal."
That was news to Engleby and his customers. "The customers are really
disappointed, they're saying can they do that?," Engleby said. "Everyone
is shocked that DEA has that kind of power. One city council member
came in to express his support; he didn't think it was right."
Unfortunately for Jerry Clark and Kathy Fiedler of Des Moines, they were
already well aware of federal paraphernalia laws. Their shop, Daydreams,
was raided by the feds last year, and they are scarred by the experience.
"We were raided by US Postal Inspectors, the DEA, and local cops and sheriff's
deputies," Clark told DRCNet, "and we're barely hanging on now. It's
hurt us financially; we've lost over $250,000 in inventory and paid out lots
of money in legal fees."
"And they're using the RICO act on us, so we're facing 10 to 12 years," Clark
said bitterly. "They've seized my partner's properties under the asset
forfeiture laws. But all we can do is try to litigate our way out or
come to a negotiated settlement. We're trying to work out a better
deal than going to court."
"We weren't aware of the federal law," interjected Fiedler, "but let's face
it, we weren't the only ones. We did everything to the letter of the
law as we knew it, we did not sell to minors, we checked ID, if they didn't
have ID, tough luck."
Clark and Fiedler remain in business, but they are angry. "This is
a bullshit law," snorted Clark, "and you have to get mad at the people who
created this stupid law. But," he hesitated, "looking at the penalties
we face, we're not going to do anything to rock the boat."
"We don't feel like felons," added Fiedler, more hurt than angry. "These
people don't have any idea who's smoking -- they think it's the kids, but
our customers are lawyers, preachers, even people from the state Attorney
General's office. They're nice, average people, but instead of drinking
a six-pack, they'd prefer to smoke things."
"Morally, I see nothing wrong with what we're doing," she insisted.
That doesn't matter to the feds. Although the anti-head shop campaign
is irregular and occasional compared to the feds' halcyon days of Operation
Pipeline in the early 1990s, when they ran most major manufacturers out of
business, it is Engleby's and Clark's and Fiedler's misfortune to live in
an area where the United States Attorney happens to be one of the most experienced
and enthusiastic in dealing with federal drug paraphernalia violations.
So who ordered the raids? Hard to say. Repeated calls to the
DEA were referred to the US Attorneys' office in Des Moines, and they didn't
return calls. The Iowa City Police Department's laconic Lt. Wyss, who
coordinates the Johnson County Multi-Agency Task Force, did confirm that
his officers participated at the DEA's request.
When asked why his officers were devoting their time to busting bongs, Wyss
told DRCNet: "Because they violated the law, I suppose. The DEA
asked us and we were happy to help."
Attorney Vaughan, who is representing Clark and Fiedler, finds it all faintly
ridiculous were it not for the serious consequences.
"With Operation Pipeline they managed to knock out all the big boys," he
told DRCNet, "but all they've created is a whole multi-level cottage industry,
and lot's of these people don't even know about the federal law, they don't
have any historical memory of Pipeline, and enforcement is sporadic.
What a waste of time and resources and peoples' lives."
"It's as if the feds we're out arresting the guy smoking a joint on the corner,"
he said.
-- END --
Issue #174, 2/23/01
New Report Rakes Clinton on Imprisonment | The Coca-Go-Round: Peruvian Production Starts to Increase as Spraying Destroys Colombian Fields | Washington State Hardliners Pitch Kindler, Gentler Drug War in Bid to Preempt Deeper Reforms | New Mexico: Update on Gov. Johnson's Drug Reform Package | Feds vs. Bongs: Heads Up for Head Shops | Newsbrief: American Pilots in Firefight With Colombian Rebels | Marijuana Has Less Adverse Effect on Driving Than Alcohol, Tiredness, UK Study Says | Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative Legal Briefs Online | An Invitation to Help Repeal the Rockefeller Drug Laws | | Erratum: Three Strikes Clarification | The Reformer's Calendar | Editorial: The Peace Process
|
This issue -- main page
This issue -- single-file printer version
Drug War Chronicle -- main page
Chronicle archives
|
PERMISSION to reprint or
redistribute any or all of the contents of Drug War Chronicle (formerly The Week Online with DRCNet is hereby
granted. We ask that any use of these materials include proper credit and,
where appropriate, a link to one or more of our web sites. If your
publication customarily pays for publication, DRCNet requests checks
payable to the organization. If your publication does not pay for
materials, you are free to use the materials gratis. In all cases, we
request notification for our records, including physical copies where
material has appeared in print. Contact: StoptheDrugWar.org: the Drug Reform Coordination Network,
P.O. Box 18402, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 293-8340 (voice), (202)
293-8344 (fax), e-mail [email protected]. Thank
you.
Articles of a purely
educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of the DRCNet
Foundation, unless otherwise noted.
|