Newsbrief:
Supreme
Court
Lets
Stand
Ruling
Allowing
Drug
Dog
Searches
Outside
People's
Homes
4/8/05
https://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle-old/381/drugdogs.shtml
On Monday, the US Supreme
Court declined to hear an appeal of a Houston case in which police used
a drug dog to sniff outside a man's garage. The non-ruling comes
on the heels of the court's January decision ratifying the use of drug
dogs in traffic stops. In that ruling, dissenting justices David
Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg warned that it could lead to more intrusive
drug dog searches, and police in Houston are apparently prepared to test
the limits of the law.
|
|
military drug dog in training exercise
|
|
But they won't have to.
Instead, the Supreme Court let stand a federal appeals court ruling against
David Gregory Smith. In that case, police sicced a drug dog on Smith's
garage and when the drug dog alerted, police used the alert as the basis
for a search of Smith's home. As a result, he was arrested and ultimately
convicted of drug possession. Smith argued that the drug dog sniff
was an improper police search that violated his Fourth Amendment rights
against arbitrary searches.
"The use of a drug-sniffing
dog at the entrance of a private home to detect the contents of the dwelling
strips the citizenry of the most basic boundary of personal privacy by
gathering invisible information coming from the interior of the home,"
Smith argued in his appeal.
While the US Supreme Court
has upheld the use of drug dogs, confusion lingers over the permissible
extent of their use. Smith argued that the correct precedent in his
case was not the January highway drug dog case but a 2001 case involving
the use of thermal imaging, in which the court held that a warrant was
necessary. "No distinction exists between a thermal-imaging device
and drug-sniffing dog in that they are both sense-enhancing and permit
information regarding the interior of a home be gathered which could not
otherwise be obtained without physical intrusion into a constitutionally
protected area," Smith argued.
But by refusing to accept
Smith's case, the Supreme Court both affirmed his conviction (and 37-year
sentence for methamphetamine possession) and left unsettled the limits
to drug dog searches.
-- END --
Issue #381
-- 4/8/05
Medical
Marijuana
Bills
Moving
in
the
States
|
Hemp
Legislation
on
the
Move
in
the
States
|
NORML
2005:
Activists
Meet
and
Plot
in
America's
Marijuana
Mecca
|
Pushing
the
Envelope
in
Oaksterdam
|
How
Did
Your
US
Representative
Vote
on
Medical
Marijuana
Last
Year?
|
Please
Help
Students
Losing
Financial
Aid
for
College
Because
of
Drug
Convictions
Get
Their
Aid
Back
--
Alerts
Online
for
the
House,
Senate,
and
Arizona
and
Rhode
Island
Legislatures
|
Newsbrief:
With
Prohibition
Failing,
China
Calls
for
"Peoples'
War"
on
Drugs
|
Newsbrief:
This
Week's
Corrupt
Cops
Stories
|
Newsbrief:
Supreme
Court
Lets
Stand
Ruling
Allowing
Drug
Dog
Searches
Outside
People's
Homes
|
Newsbrief:
State
Courts
in
Indiana,
Oregon
Restrict
Police
Garbage
Searches
|
Newsbrief:
Iowa
League
of
Women
Voters
Criticizes
Drug
Policy,
Calls
for
Sentencing
Reform
|
Newsbrief:
NORML
Issues
Sobering
Report
on
Prohibitionist
"Drugged
Driving"
Offensive
|
Media
Scan:
American
Enterprise
Institute
on
US
Drug
Policy,
New
York
Times
on
Hurwitz
Case,
Christopher
Hallam
on
Afghanistan,
NYPD
Narcotics
Against
Legalization
|
This
Week
in
History
|
The
Reformer's
Calendar
|
This issue -- main page
This issue -- single-file printer version
Drug War Chronicle -- main page
Chronicle archives
|
PERMISSION to reprint or
redistribute any or all of the contents of Drug War Chronicle (formerly The Week Online with DRCNet is hereby
granted. We ask that any use of these materials include proper credit and,
where appropriate, a link to one or more of our web sites. If your
publication customarily pays for publication, DRCNet requests checks
payable to the organization. If your publication does not pay for
materials, you are free to use the materials gratis. In all cases, we
request notification for our records, including physical copies where
material has appeared in print. Contact: StoptheDrugWar.org: the Drug Reform Coordination Network,
P.O. Box 18402, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 293-8340 (voice), (202)
293-8344 (fax), e-mail [email protected]. Thank
you.
Articles of a purely
educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of the DRCNet
Foundation, unless otherwise noted.
|