Peruvian cocaleros (coca growers) and their sympathizers, who only last week hailed a meeting with President Alejandro Toledo and a resulting set of proposed agreements as a "partial victory," have seen their elation turn to ashes this week. Leaders of the Confederation of Peruvian Coca Growers (Confederacion Nacional de Productores Agropecuarios de las Cuencas Cocaleras del Perú, or CONCPACCP) had led thousands of cocaleros on a two-week march to Lima to protest forced eradication policies, corruption and debility in alternative development programs, and the arrest of imprisoned leader Nelson Palomino, thought they had won a victory after Toledo took an offering of coca leaf from them and pronounced it "sacred," but the accords they thought they had negotiated with the government did not appear in the Supreme Decree published by the government the following day. The discovery came only as the thousands of cocaleros were already on their way back to the coca fields of the Apurimac, the Ene and the Upper Huallaga river valleys.
Now the cocaleros are
rejecting the agreement, and the government is calling them "deal
breakers." But while the deal was supposed to address the demands of the
cocaleros, the decree published Friday instead called for forced
eradication of new coca crops.Peruvian cocaleros (coca
growers) and their sympathizers, who only last week hailed a meeting with
President Alejandro Toledo and a resulting set of proposed agreements as a
"partial victory," have seen their elation turn to ashes this week.
Leaders of the Confederation of Peruvian Coca Growers (Confederacion
Nacional de Productores Agropecuarios de las Cuencas Cocaleras del Perú,
or CONCPACCP) had led thousands of cocaleros on a two-week march to Lima
to protest forced eradication policies, corruption and debility in
alternative development programs, and the arrest of imprisoned leader
Nelson Palomino, thought they had won a victory after Toledo took an
offering of coca leaf from them and pronounced it "sacred," but the
accords they thought they had negotiated with the government did not
appear in the Supreme Decree published by the government the following
day. The discovery came only as the thousands of cocaleros were already on
their way back to the coca fields of the Apurimac, the Ene and the Upper
Huallaga river valleys.
Now the cocaleros are
rejecting the agreement, and the government is calling them "deal
breakers." But while the deal was supposed to address the demands of the
cocaleros, the decree published Friday instead called for forced
eradication of new coca crops.
Baldomero
Cáceres "The cocaleros are furious and
feel tricked and lied to once again by DEVIDA [Peruvian anti-drug agency]
and Prime Minister Solari," said former DEVIDA adviser turned critic Hugo
Cabieses. "The Supreme Decree published last week is not the product of an
agreement, as Solari and [DEVIDA director Nils] Ericsson portrayed it, but
a manipulative and authoritarian imposition," he told DRCNet. "We all
thought the Supreme Decree would have the agreements reached with the
cocalero leaders, but that is not the case."
But in an attitude akin to
that of feudal peasants petitioning the king to overrule his cruel
ministers, the cocaleros still retain faith in their "Cholo [Indian]
Toledo," Cabieses said. "They believe that President Toledo will address
their Platform of Struggle because 'he has been poor and he is in the
presidency thanks to us.'" Still, that faith is tempered with a bit of
political hardball, said Cabieses. "They are asking for a direct dialogue
with Toledo, and they are giving him 30 days before they renew their
protests."
Some aren't waiting that long.
On Tuesday, confederation leader Marisella Guillen held a Lima press
conference to criticize the Supreme Decree as "benefiting only the
non-governmental organizations [who administer alternative development
programs]" and to announce that supporters will introduce two bills in the
Peruvian parliament to address cocalero demands. And according to
Cabieses, coca growers in other regions are already rejecting the decree
and preparing to mobilize again. In Monzon, Cabieses reported, cocaleros
are preparing a new "march of sacrifice" to Lima, while in Quillabamba,
angry cocaleros Wednesday rejected the confederation's leadership for
having been taken in by the government.
For its part, DEVIDA rejected
any questioning of the decree and issued a statement calling Guillen's
press conference "an attempt to break the agreement that both parties had
arrived at." The DEVIDA statement did not address the discrepancy between
the agreements reached through negotiations and the text of the published
decree.
"Solari and DEVIDA are
regrettably trying to divide the masses by trying to negotiate separate
regional agreements -- for 'technical reasons,' they say -- and are trying
to de-legitimize their proposals by saying they are being manipulated by
politicians, terrorists and narcos," said Cabieses.
Hugo Cabieses, cocalero Morales has led Bolivian coca
growers to substantial political power, and the conflict between the peasants
of the Chapare and President Sanchez de Lozada over US-backed eradication
policies, along with other simmering social issues, has shaken the government.
Indeed, Andean governments are caught between two
irreconcilable forces: substantial numbers of their own citizens who
depend on coca, and an administration in Washington that demands its
eradication. Perhaps President Toledo was listening this week as US drug
czar John Walters issued dire warnings to Andean leaders thinking of
heeding the demands of their own people.
"Naturally, we are concerned
amount political events in the Andes," said Walters Wednesday at a press
conference presenting a Spanish version of the US anti-drug strategy. "If
the drug traffickers and growers take power some place, that country will
be converted into an international pariah where there will be neither
national nor foreign investment, nor the creation of legal jobs," Walters
warned.
See http://www.narconews.com/Issue29/article747.html
for a recent interview with Hugo Cabieses by Karine
Muller.
"It was a
cruel and premeditated trick," said Peruvian academic and cocalero adviser
Baldomero Cáceres (http://www.cocachasqui.org). "This
decree represents the interests of the political elite before the
Americans, not the national interest," he told DRCNet. "The Law of Coca,
the origin of the problems for the cocaleros and of the corruption in the
country, still stands. Its repeal is a key demand not only of the
cocaleros, but the academic community."
"If President Toledo does not open the
doors and have a dialogue with the coca growers without deceptions, he
will continue falling in the polls, the struggles of the cocaleros will
continue, they will generate their own political leadership, and their
movement will grow ever stronger," warned Cabieses. "The spirit of Bolivian
cocalero leader Evo Morales and his Movement to Socialism will run through
the coca valleys of Peru."
leader Nancy Obregón,
and US drug reformer
Eric Sterling in Mérida