Skip to main content

Spin Spin Spin

Submitted by David Borden on
The prohibitionists have been framing the questions for too long. It is time to go on the attack. There are cogent arguments that can be easily put forth. For example, if they say that they want to maintain prohibition to keep drugs away from children, the reply could be; The current system makes it easier for kids to get drugs. Why do you support a system that does that? If they say that drugs are connected to crime, the response is Yes, the fact that drugs are illegal does fund gangs. Why do you support a system that funds gangs? You get the drift. Reframe the question, make them squirm. Show them that this is an unreasonable restriction on all of us, and that it leads to bad outcomes, which are often the opposite of what people say they want. Any other examples?

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Permission to Reprint: This content is licensed under a modified Creative Commons Attribution license. Content of a purely educational nature in Drug War Chronicle appear courtesy of DRCNet Foundation, unless otherwise noted.