Marijuana Is Now Legal in Colorado! [FEATURE]
And then there were two. On Monday, December 10, 2012, Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper signed an executive order certifying last month's Amendment 64 victory and legalizing the use, possession, and limited cultivation of marijuana by adults 21 and over.
[image:1 align:left]Colorado now joins Washington as states where voters approved marijuana legalization last month and where the will of the voters has now become law. In both states, it is only the possession (and cultivation in Colorado) parts of the new laws that are now in effect. Officials in Denver and Olympia have a matter of some months to craft and enact regulatory schemes for commercial marijuana cultivation and distribution -- provided the federal government does not seek to block them from doing so.
While the federal government may seek to block implementation of regulations, it cannot make the two states recriminalize marijuana possession. And the states have no obligation to enforce federal marijuana laws.
In both states, however, it remains illegal to sell marijuana or cultivate it commercially pending the enactment of regulatory schemes. Still, pot possession is now legal in Washington and Colorado.
"Voters were loud and clear on Election Day," Hickenlooper wrote. "We will begin working immediately with the General Assembly and state agencies to implement Amendment 64."
In addition to the executive order certifying the election results, Hickenlooper also signed an executive order establishing a 24-person task force charged with coming up with a way to implement Amendment 64's taxation and regulation provisions. The task force consists of government officials and other stakeholders, including representatives of medical marijuana patients, producers, and non-medical consumers, and will make recommendations to the legislature on how to establish a commercial marijuana market.
"All stakeholders share an interest in creating efficient and effective regulations that provide for the responsible development of the new marijuana laws," the executive order said. "As such, there is a need to create a task force through which we can coordinate and create a regulatory structure that promotes the health and safety of the people of Colorado."
Issues that will be addressed include: the need to amend current state and local laws regarding the possession, sale, distribution or transfer of marijuana and marijuana products to conform them to Amendment 64's decriminalization provisions; the need for new regulations for such things as security requirements for marijuana establishments and for labeling requirements; education regarding long-term health effects of marijuana use and harmful effects of marijuana use by those under the age of 18; and the impact of Amendment 64 on employers and employees and the Colorado economy.
The task force will also work to reconcile Colorado and federal laws such that the new laws and regulations do not subject Colorado state and local governments and state and local government employees to prosecution by the federal government.
"Task force members are charged with finding practical and pragmatic solutions to the challenges of implementing Amendment 64 while at all times respecting the diverse perspectives that each member will bring to the work of the task force," the executive order emphasized. "The task force shall respect the will of the voters of Colorado and shall not engage in a debate of the merits of marijuana legalization or Amendment 64."
Marijuana legalization supporters cheered the issuance of the executive orders.
"This is a truly historic day. From this day forward, adults in Colorado will no longer be punished for the simple use and possession of marijuana. We applaud Gov. Hickenlooper for issuing this declaration in a timely fashion, so that adult possession arrests end across the state immediately," said Mason Tvert, one of the two official proponents for Amendment 64 and newly appointed communications director for the Marijuana Policy Project.
"We look forward to working with the governor's office and many other stakeholders on the implementation of Amendment 64," Tvert continued. "We are certain that this will be a successful endeavor, and Colorado will become a model for other states to follow."
Not everyone was as thrilled as Tvert. Both US Attorney for Colorado John Walsh and Colorado State Patrol James Wolfinbarger issued statements Monday warning respectively that marijuana is still illegal under federal law and that driving while impaired by marijuana is still a crime.
"The Department of Justice is reviewing the legalization initiatives recently passed in Colorado and Washington state," Walsh said in his statement. "The Department's responsibility to enforce the Controlled Substances Act remains unchanged. Neither states nor the executive branch can nullify a statute passed by Congress. In enacting the Controlled Substances Act, Congress determined that marijuana is a Schedule I controlled substance. Regardless of any changes in state law, including the change that will go into effect on December 10th in Colorado, growing, selling or possessing any amount of marijuana remains illegal under federal law. Members of the public are also advised to remember that it remains against federal law to bring any amount of marijuana onto federal property, including all federal buildings, national parks and forests, military installations, and courthouses."
"The Colorado State Patrol would like to remind motorists that if you chose to consume marijuana and make the decision to drive that you are taking a huge risk," Wolfinbarger said. "Drivers must realize that if you are stopped by law enforcement officials and it is determined that your ability to operate a motor vehicle has been affected to the slightest degree by drugs or alcohol or both, you may be arrested and subjected to prosecution under Colorado's DUI/DUID laws. It is imperative that everyone takes responsibility for public safety when driving on Colorado's highways."
While the implementation of regulations for marijuana commerce in Colorado and Washington is by no means assured, the legalization of pot possession in the two states is a done deal. And with it, a huge hole has been blown through the wall of marijuana prohibition. Since the election last month, public opinion polls have shown increasing support -- and in three out of four cases, majority support -- for marijuana legalization, as well as little patience for federal interference in states that have legalized.
Marijuana prohibition may not be dead yet, but voters in Colorado and Washington have delivered a mortal blow. The clock is ticking.
Comments
Boulder in the spring
Already planning a vacation in Boulder this spring, hiking, cycling, rafting, baking...
Drug tourism? Not really. I'm just gonna celebrate a long awaited return of personal liberty.
In reply to Boulder in the spring by Anonymouse (not verified)
Tourism
We welcome those who choose to spend their hard earned tourist dollars visiting colorful Colorado. Just remember where you came from and go back there. We do not need a higher population, we have enough fruits and nuts here already. Also, please be aware that law enforcement in surrounding states will be laying in wait for any cars leaving Colorado, so if you're planning a little drug running you'll probably get what you deserve. If you want legal cannabis, then work towards that cause in your state. That's what we did.....
We can all forget about Mexican weed by next year
It will be kind of pointless trafficking marijuana across the US-Mexico border with Washington and Colorado selling it. "Grow baby grow!!!"
The only places where Mexican
The only places where Mexican weed is still selling is in the strictest states, with not even medical tolerance. And if these people had nice fluffy, sticky American grown sensi buds easily available they would not being buying Mexican dirt. Mexican weed is already dead in places like CO and WA.
Your Duty in Colorado
Harm and Driving
They'll have a hard time coming up with the "harm" Pot is accused of creating. Pot doesn't kill people, people kill people(to paraphrase that other slogan). The thing about driving is bunk too. In 1970, both the Michigan and Oregon Departments of Transportation did studies on Pot influenced drivers and Booze influenced drivers vs. those that partook of nothing at all. They found out that the Pot influenced drivers were actually safer drivers than the straight drivers, and those on booze failed miserably. The thing about pot is it persists in your system, in your fatty tissues, so it is present(but not effective) for long periods of time. These findings were replicated by Car and Driver magazine in the '90's, and by another study that I don't remember offhand. These laws need to be reexamined as well.
In reply to Harm and Driving by BP Storm (not verified)
i think it all depends on how
i think it all depends on how much under the influence of pot one is, whether or not one might in fact be a safer driver, and i speak from experience. it should be obvious that if u're so stoned u're having a hard time remembering anything, such as 'where am i?' and 'where am i going?'... it's definitely not a good idea to drive. on the other hand, under a moderate influence i tend to agree that pot might actually promote safety. i think it made me more conscientious, more concerned with safety. i don't know if it would affect everyone similarly, though. probably depends on the individual.
In reply to i think it all depends on how by the virgin terry (not verified)
Bunk!!!!!
I've driven thousands of miles stoned. I never forgot where I was going, and I have a better driving record than most people, I dare say.
In reply to Bunk!!!!! by BP Storm (not verified)
driving
Medical MJ vs. Public Housing Assistance
Im in the middle of 2 laws where 1 needs to be modfided for those who use and need Marijuana for medical use. Please read and feel free to share! This story needs to get out for those PHA's who need to revise their personal administrative rules to accomodate those in need. A memorandum was released stating its a case-by-case choice whether or not medical marijuana would be acceptable. So, please take time to read my story so all out there are aware of these situations! "Don't ask, Don't tell" policy now an efficient way to decribe medical marijuana?
http://www.boulderweekly.com/article-10326-longmont-woman-caught-between-two-laws.html
Medical MJ vs. Public Housing Assistance
Im in the middle of 2 laws where 1 needs to be modified for those who use and need Marijuana for medical use. Please read and feel free to share! This story needs to get out for those PHA'swho need to revise their personal administrative rules to accommodate those in need. A memorandum was released stating its a case-by-case choice whether or not medical marijuana would be acceptable. So, please take time to read my story so all out there are aware of these situations!
My Story (please read)
"Don't ask, Don't tell" policy now would be an efficient way to describe medical marijuana?
In reply to Medical MJ vs. Public Housing Assistance by Ashley Weber (not verified)
http://www.boulderweekly.com/
http://www.boulderweekly.com/article-10326-longmont-woman-caught-between-two-laws.html
Add new comment