"Regulate Marijuana Like Wine" Wins 62% in CA Poll
A voter survey commissioned by California's Regulate Marijuana Like Wine (RMLW) initiative campaign suggests the initiative could win at the polls in November -- if it manages to make it onto the ballot.
[image:1 align:left]RMLW is one of handful of proposed 2012 California marijuana legalization initiatives, all of them ill-funded. For any of them to make the ballot, they have to come up with more than 500,000 valid voter signatures by April, a task that is considered almost impossibly to accomplish by volunteer efforts alone.
RMLW commissioned the poll in a bid to show potential funders it could win in November, and with these poll results, the campaign can now make that argument. California initiative watchers estimate that it would take between $1 and $2 million in paid signature-gathering to make the ballot.
The statewide poll of 800 likely voters conducted by Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz & Associates found support for the initiative at 62%, with 35% opposed and 3% undecided. No cross-tabs have been made available.
The poll found even higher levels of support for more general critiques of current drug laws and the level of attention California law enforcement pays to marijuana. Four out of five respondents (80%) agreed with the statement, "State and federal drug laws are outdated and have failed, therefore, we need to take a new approach that makes sense for today," while 71% agreed that law enforcement spends too much, time, money, and resources enforcing marijuana laws.
If RMLW were to pass, the California Legislative Analyst's Office has projected "savings of potentially several tens of millions of dollars annually to state and local governments of the costs of incarcerating and supervising certain marijuana offenders," as well as potentially generating "hundreds of millions of dollars in net additional tax revenues related to the production and sale of marijuana products."
"There is no policy that is more discriminatory or wastes more tax dollars," said RMLW treasurer Steve Collett, who hailed the poll results. "This initiative helps farmers, reduces prison overcrowding, relieves burdens on the courts, generates revenues for the state, and frees up police to work on real crimes."
The results also encouraged Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP) co-founder Jack Cole. "LEAP believes the citizens of California are far ahead of the federal government in assessing a policy that will reduce death, disease, crime, and corruption, when they register 62% support for the initiative Regulate Marijuana Like Wine," he said.
Proponents of the competing marijuana legalization initiatives are working to set up a joint meeting, a so-called "Cannadome" in the Bay Area for mid-February. Whether these new poll results will make any difference in forging unity then remains to be seen.
Comments
What does this mean for the
What does this mean for the funding? The RMLW gang were touting major funders for the past week, but where are the George Soros, Peter Lewis and the George Zimmer's?
What?!?
62% is nearly unbelievable under ANY circumstances. Didn't Gallup have it at 50%?
In reply to What?!? by AFH (not verified)
Not unbelievable
The difference is in the wording, the gallup one was for all of America and asked about legalizing weed as opposed to asking california only about regulating it like alcohol. Not surprising it gets more support. Hopefully all the other initiatives support RMLW, it's written better, and has a better chance than the others IMO.
Big numbers!
These numbers are huge for a poll of its kind. To obtain 62% is pretty remarkable considering they have not even had an education campaign to sell RMLW. Notwithstanding almost 2/3 of the "likely voters" in California support marijuana regulation like wine? I think come November LikeWine will really do well.
Damn, it would be a shame not to have a referendum after this
kind of encouragement. I'm glad to hear that backers of the competing initiatives are trying to get united.
Back in 2010 people were saying 2012 might be better because of the higher youth turnout in Presidential election years. And the turnout among young people was disappointingly normal in 2010 in California. I read that the referendum would have been really close if as many younger people voted as do in Presidential election years. Waiting another 2 years, until another off year election, might not be a good idea!
62%
well one thing bothers me here the survey only contacted 800 voters I really think we need a larger sampling of the states population. I definitly want to sign up to help this get on the ballot. this is what we have been needing in this state for some time now.
Lets make this simple
Why is there not unity? It is because initiatives like RMLW in particular are all about how their peeps can profit from the initiative. Beware of the wolves in sheep clothing. I would never vote for it just on principle alone. Just say," it will be legalized and you can grow your own weed" and yes, it will be regulated like alcohol with similar laws to ease the bible thumpers and bigots. For me, the biggest stumbling block is the refusal of employment based on a positive THC test. Actually, why do we have this crap anyway? Until this is fixed, nothing matters. Don't have all the smoke and mirrors. Voters are not as stupid as Kampia, Kubby, and the rest of their gang thinks.
Add new comment